Verification by IEC

Certification by ET

 


Contract No. HY/2013/01

Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge

Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities ¡V Passenger Clearance Building

 

 

 

 

 

Final EM&A Review Report

(Covering the Period from 26 September 2014 to 31 January 2019)

 

24 March 2020

 

Revision 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Main Contractor                                                                                                          Environmental Team 

 

 

 

Contents

Executive Summary

1....... Introduction. 1

1.1                          Basic Project Information. 1

1.2                          Project Organisation. 1

1.3                          Construction Programme. 2

2....... EM&A Requirement 3

2.1                          Summary of EM&A Requirements. 3

2.2                          Monitoring Requirements. 7

2.3                          Action and Limit Levels. 7

2.4                          Event Action Plans. 9

2.5                          Mitigation Measures. 9

3....... Environmental Monitoring and Audit 10

3.1                          Air Quality Monitoring Results. 10

3.2                          Noise Monitoring Results. 14

3.3                          Water Quality Monitoring Results. 15

3.4                          Dolphins Monitoring Results. 19

3.5                          Implementation of Environmental Measures. 21

3.6                          Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status. 21

3.7                          Site Inspection. 21

4....... Summary of Exceedance, Complaint, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution. 22

4.1                          Summary of Exceedance of the Environmental Quality Performance Limit 22

4.2                          Summary of Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution. 22

5....... Review of the Validity of the EIA Predication.. 24

6....... Comments, Recommendations and Conclusion. 26

6.1                          Comments. 26

6.2                          Recommendations. 26

6.3                          Conclusions. 26

 

Figures

Figure 2.1      Location of Air Quality and Noise Monitoring Stations

Figure 2.2    Location of Water Quality Monitoring Stations

Figure 2.3    Impact Dolphins Monitoring Line Transect Layout Map

 

Appendices

Appendix A       Location of Works Areas

Appendix B       Project Organization for Environmental Works

Appendix C       Construction Programme

Appendix D       Event and Action Plan

Appendix E       Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation Measures (EMIS)

Appendix F       Monitoring Data and Graphical Plot (Air Quality, Noise and Water Quality)

Appendix G      Waste Flow Table

Appendix H       Statistics on Environmental Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions


Executive Summary

This Final Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Review Report is prepared for Contract HY/2013/01 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities (HKBCF) ¡V Passenger Clearance Building (hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contract¡¨) (includes the construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities ¡V Automatic Vehicle Clearance Support System within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area) for the Highways Department of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). The Contract was awarded to Leighton ¡V Chun Wo Joint Venture (construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 was awarded to ATAL Technologies Limited within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area) (hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contractor¡¨) and Atkins China Limited was appointed as the Environmental Team (ET) by the Contractor.

The Contract is part of Hong Kong ¡V Zhuhai ¡V Macao Bridge HKBCF which is a ¡§Designated Project¡¨, under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap 499) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Register No. AEIAR-145/2009) was prepared for the Project. The current Environmental Permit (EP) No. EP-353/2009/K for HKBCF was issued on 11 April 2016. These documents are available through the EIA Ordinance Register. Site preparation works of the Contract started on 26 September 2014 and the construction works of the Contract commenced on 6 October 2014. The construction works of the Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area commenced on 20 February 2018.

Atkins China Limited has been appointed by the Contractor to implement the Environmental Monitoring & Audit (EM&A) programme for the Contract in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual for HKBCF (Version1.0) and will be providing environmental team services to the Contract.

This is the Final EM&A Review Report for the Contract which summaries findings of the EM&A works during the reporting period from 26 September 2014 to 31 January 2019 (includes the construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area). According to the memo with reference number ( ) in E771/E1/100 issued by Environmental Protection Department (EPD), EPD had no comment on the proposal for termination of EM&A programme for Contract No. HY/2013/01. The construction phase EM&A programme for Contract No. HY/2013/01 was terminated since 1 February 2019.

Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress

The EM&A programme was undertaken in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual for HKBCF (Version 1.0). It should be noted that the air quality monitoring works for the Contract were covered by Contract No. HY/2011/03 ¡§Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road ¡V Section between Scenic Hill and HKBCF¡¨ from 26 September 2014 to 31 January 2019, Contract No. HY/2010/02 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge HKBCF ¡V Reclamation Works from 26 September 2014 to 31 August 2017, Contract No. HY/2013/01 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge HKBCF ¡V Passenger Clearance Building from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 and Contract No. HY/2013/04 HZMB HKBCF ¡V Infrastructure Works Stage II (Southern Portion) since 1 October 2018.

The noise monitoring works for the Contract were covered by Contract No. HY/2010/02 from 26 September 2014 to 31 August 2017, Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 and Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 20 August 2018.

The water quality monitoring and impact dolphin monitoring for the Contract were covered by Contract No. HY/2010/02 from 1 November 2016 to 31 August 2017, Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 and Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018.

The air quality, noise, water quality and dolphin monitoring works under Contract No. HY/2010/02 were suspended from 1 September 2017. The ET of Contract No. HY/2013/01 continued the same environmental monitoring works (except air quality monitoring work at AMS6) commencing from September 2017. The entire environmental monitoring responsibility under the EM&A programme for the HZMB HKBCF Project has been changed from Contract No. HY/2013/01 to Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018.

The responsibilities of the Contracts for implementation of air quality and noise monitoring at monitoring stations, water quality monitoring and impact dolphin monitoring during the reporting period are summarized in the following table:


Reporting Month

Air Quality Monitoring

Noise Monitoring

Water Quality Monitoring

Dolphin Monitoring

AMS6

AMS2

AMS3B

AMS3C

AMS7

AMS7A

AMS7B

NMS2

NMS3B

NMS3C

Sep-14

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Oct-14

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Nov-14

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Dec-14

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Jan-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Feb-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Mar-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Apr-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

May-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Jun-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Jul-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Aug-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Sep-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Oct-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Nov-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Dec-15

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Jan-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Feb-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Mar-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Apr-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

May-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Jun-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Jul-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Aug-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Sep-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Oct-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

Nov-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Dec-16

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Jan-17

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Feb-17

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Mar-17

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Apr-17

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

May-17

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Jun-17

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Jul-17

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Aug-17

HY/2011/03

 

 

 

HY/2010/02

 

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

 

HY/2010/02

HY/2010/02

Sep-17

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Oct-17

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Nov-17

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Dec-17

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Jan-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Feb-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Mar-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Apr-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

May-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Jun-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Jul-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Aug-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/04

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Sep-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/04

 

 

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/01

HY/2013/01

Oct-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/04

 

HY/2013/04

 

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

Nov-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/04

 

HY/2013/04

 

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

Dec-18

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/04

 

HY/2013/04

 

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

Jan-19

HY/2011/03

HY/2013/04

 

HY/2013/04

 

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

 

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04

HY/2013/04


During the reporting period, 214 environmental site inspections were carried out to monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the Contracts. All work site areas under the Contract No. HY/2013/01 have been handed over to the relevant responsible parties since 24 October 2018 and the site areas have been changed to closed area. No environmental site inspection was conducted for the Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 November 2018 to 31 January 2019.

Breaches of Action and Limit Levels:

Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS6 shall be referred to the monthly EM&A report prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03.

It is noted that no marine work and marine transportation were being done by the Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 October 2018 to 31 January 2019. Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedance of water quality monitoring are reported in the monthly EM&A Report prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04 from 1 October 2018 to 31 January 2019.

The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A Reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02 (from September 2016 to August 2017). The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances from September 2018 to November 2018 can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A report for October 2018 to November 2018 prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

A summary of environmental exceedances for the reporting period are listed below:

Environmental Monitoring

Parameters

Action Level (AL)

Limit Level (LL)

Air Quality

1-hr TSP

-

-

24-hr TSP

4

-

 

Noise

Leq (30 min)

-

-

 

Water Quality

 

Suspended solids level (SS)

103

8

Turbidity level

13

1

Dissolved oxygen level (DO)

449

105

Dolphin Monitoring

Quarterly Analysis(1)

-

4

Remark: (1) Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedances of dolphin monitoring from September 2016 to August 2017 and from September 2018 to November 2018 are not included in the table. The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A Reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02 (from September 2016 to August 2017). The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances from September 2018 to November 2018 can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A report for October 2018 to November 2018 prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

Implementation of Environmental Measures

Site inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the Project. Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities were monitored and reviewed.

Most of the recommended mitigation measures, as included in the EM&A programme, were implemented properly in the reporting period.

The recommended environmental mitigation measures effectively minimize the potential environmental impacts from the construction works of Contracts (includes the construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area). The EM&A programme effectively monitored the environmental impacts from the construction activities and ensure the proper implementation of mitigation measures. No particular recommendation was advised for the improvement of the programme.

Complaint Log

There were 11 complaints received in relation to the environmental impact during reporting period.

 

Notifications of Summons and Successful Prosecutions

There was no notification of summon or prosecution received during reporting period.


1          Introduction

1.1                Basic Project Information

1.1.1      This Final Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Review Report is prepared for Contract HY/2013/01 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities ¡V Passenger Clearance Building (hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contract¡¨) (includes the construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities ¡V Automatic Vehicle Clearance Support System within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area) for the Highways Department of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. The Contract was awarded to Leighton ¡V Chun Wo Joint Venture (construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 was awarded to ATAL Technologies Limited within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area) (hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contractor¡¨) and Atkins China Limited was appointed as the Environmental Team (ET) by the Contractor.

1.1.2      The Contract is part of Hong Kong ¡V Zhuhai ¡V Macao Bridge Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities (HKBCF) which is a ¡§Designated Project¡¨, under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap 499). An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Register No. AEIAR-145/2009) was prepared for the Project. The current Environmental Permit (EP) No. EP-353/2009/K for HKBCF was issued on 11 April 2016. These documents are available through the EIA Ordinance Register. Site preparation work of the Contract started on 26 September 2014 and the construction works of the Contract commenced on 6 October 2014. The construction works of the Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 work areas commenced on 20 February 2018. The works areas of the Contract are shown in Appendix A.

1.1.3      This is the Final EM&A Review Report for the Contract which summaries the findings of EM&A works during the reporting period from 26 September 2014 to 31 January 2019 (includes the construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area). According to the memo with reference number ( ) in E771/E1/100 issued by Environmental Protection Department (EPD), EPD had no comment on the proposal for termination of EM&A programme for Contract No. HY/2013/01. The construction phase EM&A programme for Contract No. HY/2013/01 was terminated since 1 February 2019.

1.2                Project Organisation

1.2.1      The project organization structure and lines of communication with respect to the on-site environmental management structure is shown in Appendix B. The key personnel contact names and numbers are summarized in Table 1.1. 

Table 1.1 Contact Information of Key Personnel

Party

Position

Name

Telephone

Fax

For Contract No. HY/2013/01

Engineer or Engineer¡¦s Representative
(AECOM Asia Co. Ltd.)

Chief Resident Engineer

Malcolm Sage

3958 7330

3468 2076

Environmental Project Office / Independent Environmental Checker
(Ramboll Hong Kong Limited)

Environmental Project Office Leader

Y. H. Hui

3465 2888

3465 2899

Independent Environmental Checker

Raymond Dai (until 31 Dec 2018)

3465 2888

3465 2899

Ray Yan (from 1 Jan 2019)

3465 2836

5181 8401

3465 2899

Contractor
(Leighton ¡V Chun Wo Joint Venture)

Project Manager

Owen Leung

9232 5750

3621 0180

Environmental Officer

Stephen Tsang

9686 0787

3621 0180

Environmental Team
(Atkins China Limited)

Environmental Team Leader

Keith Chau

2972 1721

2890 6343

24 hours complaint hotline

---

---

3958 7300

---

For Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area

Engineer or Engineer¡¦s Representative
(AECOM Asia Co. Ltd.)

Chief Registered Architect

Malcolm Sage

3958 7330

3468 2076

Environmental Project Office / Independent Environmental Checker (Ramboll Hong Kong Limited)

Environmental Project Office Leader

Y. H. Hui

3465 2888

3465 2899

Independent Environmental Checker

Raymond Dai (until 31 Dec 2018)

3465 2888

3465 2899

Ray Yan (from 1 Jan 2019)

3465 2836

5181 8401

3465 2899

Contractor
(ATAL Technologies Limited)

Site Agent

Mr. Eric Yim

2565 3355

3162 5217

Environmental Officer

Mr. W. Li

2565 3137

3162 5217

Environmental Team
(Atkins China Limited)

Environmental Team Leader

Keith Chau

2972 1721

2890 6343

24 hours complaint hotline

---

---

6509 0375

---

1.3                Construction Programme

1.3.1      A copy of the Contractor¡¦s construction programme is provided in Appendix C.

 

 


 

2          EM&A Requirement

2.1                Summary of EM&A Requirements

2.1.1      The EM&A programme was undertaken in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual for HKBCF (Version 1). The air quality, noise, water quality and impact dolphin monitoring works under Contract No. HY/2010/02 were suspended from 1 September 2017. The ET of Contract No. HY/2013/01 continued the same environmental monitoring works commencing on 1 September 2017. The entire environmental monitoring responsibility under the EM&A programme for the HZMB HKBCF Project has been changed from Contract No. HY/2013/01 to Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018. It should be noted that the air quality monitoring station (AMS 6) was covered by Contract No. HY/2011/03 Hong Kong-Zhuhai Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road ¡V Section between Scenic Hill and HKBCF during the reporting period.

2.1.2      The air quality monitoring at station AMS3C and noise monitoring at station NMS3C are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 20 August 2018. The air quality monitoring at station AMS2 and AMS7B and noise monitoring at station NMS2 are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/04 HZMB HKBCF ¡V Infrastructure Works Stage II (Southern Portion) since 1 October 2018.

2.1.3      In accordance with the Contract Specific EM&A Manual, impact 1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) monitoring was conducted for at least three times every 6 days, while impact 24-hour TSP monitoring was carried out for at least once every 6 days. Impact noise monitoring was conducted for at least once per week during the construction phase of the Contract.

2.1.4      A summary of air and noise monitoring locations are presented in Table 2.1. The location of air quality and noise monitoring stations are shown as in Figure 2.1.

Table 2.1  Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

Environmental Monitoring

ID

Location Description 

Air Quality

AMS 2 (1)

Tung Chung Development Pier

AMS3B (2) (3) (4)

AMS3C( 3) (4)

Site Boundary of Site Office Area at Work Area WA2

Ying Tung Estate Market Rooftop

AMS6(5)

Dragonair/CNAC (Group) Building

AMS7 (6) (7)

AMS7A (4) (6) (7)

AMS7B (4) (6) (7)

Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

Chu Kong Air-Sea Union transportation Co. Ltd.

3RS Site Office

Noise

NMS2 (8)

Seaview Crescent

NMS3B (9) (11)

NMS3C (10) (11)

Site Boundary of Site Office Area at Works Area WA2

Ying Tung Estate Refuse Collection Point

Remarks:

(1)    The air quality monitoring works at AMS2 were conducted by the ET of Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018. The air quality monitoring works for the Contract at AMS2 are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 Oct 2018.

(2)    For the monitoring location AMS3 (Ho Yu College), as proposed in the Updated EM&A Manual for HKBCF (Version 1), approval for carrying out impact monitoring could not be obtained from the principal of the school. Alternative monitoring location at AMS3B was proposed. The air quality monitoring works at AMS3B were conducted by the ET of Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 Sep 2017 to 19 Aug 2018.  

(3)    The air quality monitoring station at AMS3B was relocated and renamed as AMS3C. The air quality monitoring works at AMS3C are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 20 Aug 2019.

(4)    Same baseline and Action Level for air quality, as derived from the baseline monitoring data recorded at AMS3 - Ho Yu College/ AMS7 - Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel were adopted for these alternative air quality locations.

(5)    The air quality monitoring works at AMS6 were covered by Contract No. HY/2011/03 - Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road ¡V Section between Scenic Hill and HKBCF during the reporting period.

(6)    The original monitoring location was at Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel (AMS7). As the permission to carry out air quality monitoring at Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel was not granted after 31 January 2015, the monitoring location was relocated to Chu Kong Air-Sea Union Transportation Co. Ltd. (AMS7A) from 5 February 2015 to 30 December 2015. The alternative monitoring location at Chu Kong Air-Sea Union Transportation Co. Ltd. was approved by EPD on 5 February 2015. However, AMS7A was relocated back to its original location (AMS7-Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel) on 30 December 2015. The relocation of air quality monitoring location, AMS7A, back to AMS7 was approved by EPD on 21 December 2015. As the permission to carry out air quality monitoring at Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel was not granted after the end of January 2018, as such, a proposal for the monitoring location relocated to 3RS Site Office(AMS7B) was justified by the ET Leader for Contract No. HY/2013/01 on 22 January 2018; verified by the IEC on 24 January 2018; and submitted to EPD on 30 January 2018, and the AQM has been carrying out at AMS7B with EPD¡¦s consent since 6 February 2018.

(7)    The air quality monitoring works for the Contract at AMS7/AMS7A were covered by the Contract No. HY/2010/02 from 26 Sep 2014 to 31 Aug 2017. The air quality monitoring works at AMS7B were conduct by the ET of Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 6 Feb 2018 to 30 Sep 2018; and are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 Oct 2018.

(8)    The noise monitoring works at NMS2 were covered by Contract No. HY/2010/02 from 26 Sep 2014 to 31 Aug 2017; and were conducted by the ET of Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018; and are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 Oct 2018.   

(9)    The noise monitoring works NMS3B were covered by Contract No. HY/2010/02 from 26 Sep 2014 to 31 Aug 2017; and were conducted by the ET of Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 Sep 2017 to 19 Aug 2018.

(10) The noise monitoring works at NMS3C are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 20 Aug 2018.

(11) Limit Levels for schools will be applied for this alternative monitoring location.

 

2.1.5      The water quality monitoring works before 1 September 2017 were covered by Contract No. HY/2010/02 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge HKBCF ¡V Reclamation Works. The water quality works under Contract No. HY/2010/02 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge HKBCF ¡V Reclamation Works were suspended from 1 September 2017. Water quality monitoring works were covered by this Contract (Contract No. HY/2013/01) from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. Water quality monitoring works are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018. A total of twenty-one stations (nine Impact Stations (IS), seven Sensitive Receiver Stations (SR) and five Control/Far Field Stations (CS)) are covered by the current EM&A programme.

2.1.6      The water quality monitoring stations at CS(Mf)3 (Coordinate: 809989E, 821117N), IS10 (Coordinate: 812577E, 820670N) and SR5 (811489E, 820455N) have been occupied by the marine work of a designated project - Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System (3RS Project). The alternative water quality monitoring station at CS(Mf)3(N) (Coordinate: 808814E, 822355N), IS10(N) (Coordinate: 812942E, 820881N) and SR5(N) (812569E, 8201475N) were justified and verified by the ET Leader for Contract No. HY/2010/02 and the IEC respectively on 24 March 2017 and it was approved by EPD on 12 May 2017.

2.1.7      The impact water quality monitoring requirements are detailed in the corresponding monthly EM&A Reports prepared by Contract Nos. HY/2010/02, HY/2013/01 and HY/2013/04. Table 2.2 and Figure 2.2 show the locations of water quality monitoring stations.

Table 2.2         Impact Water Quality Monitoring Stations

Station

Description

East

North

IS5

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

811579

817106

IS(Mf)6

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

812101

817873

IS7

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

812244

818777

IS8

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

814251

818412

IS(Mf)9

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

813273

818850

IS10

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

812577

820670

IS10(N)*

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

812942

820881

IS(Mf)11

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

813562

820716

IS(Mf)16

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

814328

819497

IS17

Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site)

814539

820391

SR3(N) ^

Sensitive receivers (San Tau SSSI)

810689

816591

SR4(N)

Sensitive receivers (Tai Ho)

814705

817859

SR5

Sensitive receivers (Artificial Reef in NE Airport)

811489

820455

SR5(N)*

Sensitive receiver (Artificial Reef in NE Airport)

812569

821475

SR6

Sensitive receivers (Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park)

805837

821818

SR7

Sensitive receivers (Tai Mo Do)

814293

821431

SR10A(N) ^

Sensitive receivers (Ma Wan FCZ) 1

823644

823484

SR10B(N2) ^

Sensitive receivers (Ma Wan FCZ) 2

823689

823159

CS(Mf)3

Control Station

809989

821117

CS(Mf)3(N)*

Control Station

808814

822355

CS(Mf)5

Control Station

817990

821129

CS4

Control Station

810025

824004

CS6

Control Station

817028

823992

CSA

Control Station

818103

823064

Remarks:

* Alternative water quality monitoring stations at CS(Mf)3(N), SR5(N) and IS10(N) were justified and verified by the ET Leader for Contract No. HY/2010/02 and the IEC respectively on 24 March 2017 and it was approved by EPD on 12 May 2017.

^ Alternative water quality monitoring stations at SR3, SR10A and SR10B(N) were justified by the ET Leader on 8 November 2017 and verified by IEC on 13 November 2017; and submitted to EPD on 29 November 2017 and it was approved by EPD on 22 December 2017.

 

2.1.8      The dolphin monitoring works before 1 September 2017 are covered by Contract No. HY/2010/02. The dolphin monitoring works under Contract No. HY/2010/02 were suspended from 1 September 2017. The ET of Contract No. HY/2013/01 (From September 2017 to September 2018) and the ET of Contract No. HY/2013/04 (since 1 October 2018) are required to conduct dolphin monitoring at the twenty-four transects. The monitoring requirements are detailed in the corresponding monthly EM&A Reports prepared by Contract Nos. HY/2010/02, HY/2013/01 and HY/2013/04.  

2.1.9      The dolphin monitoring should adopt line-transect vessel survey method. The survey follows pre-set and fixed transect lines in the two areas defined by AFCD as: Northeast Lantau survey area; and Northwest Lantau survey area. The change of transect lines 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and new vessel-based transect line 24 for dolphin monitoring have been proposed due to the marine work of a designated project - Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System (3RS Project). It was justified and verified by the ET Leader for Contract No. HY/2010/02 and the IEC respectively on 24 March 2017 and it was approved by EPD on 12 May 2017.

2.1.10    The co-ordinates for the transect lines showing the transect lines and are shown in Table 2.3 and Figure 2.3 shows the layout map.

 

Table 2.3          Impact Dolphin Monitoring Line Transect Co-ordinates

Transect ID

HK Grid System

East

North

1*

804671

815456

804671

831404

2

805476

820800

805476

826654

3

806464

821150

806464

822911

4

807518

821500

807518

829230

5

808504

821850

808504

828602

6

809490

822150

809490

825352

7

810499

822000

810499

824613

8*

811508

821123

811508

824254

9*

812516

821303

812516

824254

10*

813525

820827

813525

824657

11#

814556

818853

814556

820992

12

815542

818807

815542

824882

13

816506

819480

816506

824859

14

817537

820220

817537

824613

15

818568

820735

818568

824433

16

819532

821420

819532

824209

17

820451

822125

820451

823671

18

821504

822371

821504

823761

19

822513

823268

822513

824321

20

823477

823402

823477

824613

21

805476

827081

805476

830562

22

806464

824033

806464

829598

23

814559

821739

814559

824768

24

805476

815900

805476

819100

Remarks:

(a)    * Due to the presence of deployed silt curtain systems at the site boundaries of the Contract, some of the transect lines shown in Figure 5.1 could not be fully surveyed during the regular survey. Transect 10 is reduced from 6.4km to approximately 3.6km in length due to the HKBCF construction site. Therefore, the total transect length for both NEL and NWL combined is reduced to approximately 108km.

(b)    # Coordinates for transect lines 1, 8, 9 and 11 have been updated in respect to the Proposal for Alteration of Transect Line for Dolphin Monitoring approved by EPD on 19 August 2015.

(c)     The change of transect lines 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 and new vessel-based transect line 24 for dolphin monitoring have been proposed due to the marine work of a designated project-Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System (3RS Project). It was justified and verified by the ET Leader for Contract No. HY/2010/02 and the IEC respectively on 24 March 2017 and it was approved by EPD on 12 May 2017.

(d)    Due to marine work of the Expansion of Hong Kong International Airport into a Three-Runway System (3RS Project), original transect lines of dolphin monitoring 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are enclosed by works boundary of 3RS Project. Alternative dolphin monitoring transect lines 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7 and 24 are adopted starting from 17 May 2017 to replace the original transect lines.

2.2                Monitoring Requirements

2.2.1      The monitoring requirements, monitoring equipment, monitoring parameters, frequency and duration, monitoring methodology, monitoring schedule, meteorological information are detailed in the corresponding monthly EM&A report prepared by Contract Nos, HY/2010/02, HY/2011/03, HY/2013/01 and HY/2013/04.

2.3                Action and Limit Levels

2.3.1      The Action and Limit Level for 1-hr TSP and 24-hr TSP are provided in Table 2.4 and Table 2.5, respectively.

Table 2.4            Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP

Monitoring Station

Action Level, µg/m3

Limit Level, µg/m3

AMS2 ¡V Tung Chung Development Pier

374

500

AMS3B ¡V Site Boundary of Site Office Area at Work Area WA2

AMS3C ¡V Ying Tung Estate Market Rooftop

368

AMS6 ¡V Dragonair/CNAC (Group) Building (HKIA)

360

AMS7 ¡V Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

AMS7A ¡V Chu Kong Air-Sea Union transportation Co. Ltd.

AMS7B ¡V 3RS Site Office

370

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Table 2.5          Action and Limit Levels for 24-hour TSP

Monitoring Station

Action Level, µg/m3

Limit Level, µg/m3

AMS2 ¡V Tung Chung Development Pier

176

500

AMS3B ¡V Site Boundary of Site Office Area at Work Area WA2

AMS3C ¡V Ying Tung Estate Market Rooftop

167

AMS6 ¡V Dragonair/CNAC (Group) Building (HKIA)

173

AMS7 ¡V Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

AMS7A ¡V Chu Kong Air-Sea Union transportation Co. Ltd.

AMS7B ¡V 3RS Site Office

183

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.3.2      The Action and Limit Levels for construction noise are defined in Table 2.6.

Table 2.6      Action and Limit Level for Construction Noise

Monitoring Station

Time Period

Action Level

Limit Level

NMS2 - Seaview Crescent

0700-1900 hours on normal weekdays

When one documented complaint is received.

75 dB(A)

NMS3B - Site Boundary of Site Office Area at Works Area WA2

NMS3C - Ying Tung Estate Refuse Collection Point

70/65 dB(A)*

Notes:     

If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the Noise Control Authority have to be followed.

* Reduce to 70 dB(A) for schools and 65 dB(A) during school examination period. The Limit Level for schools will be applied for NMS3B & NMS3C. Daytime noise Limit Level of 70 dB(A) applies to education institutions, while 65 dB(A) applies during the school examination period.

 

2.3.3      The Action and Limit Levels for water quality are provided in Table 2.7.

Table 2.7 Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality

Parameters

Action

Limit

DO in mg L-1

(Surface, Middle & Bottom)

Surface and Middle

5.0

Bottom

4.7

Surface and Middle

4 .2 (except 5 mg/L for FCZ)

Bottom

3.6

SS in mg L-1 (depth-averaged) at all monitoring stations and control stations

23.5 and 120% of upstream control station's SS at the same tide of the same day*

34.4 and 130% of upstream control station's SS at the same tide of the same day and 10mg/L for WSD Seawater intakes*

Turbidity in NTU

(depth-averaged)

27.5 and 120% of upstream control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day*

47.0 and 130% of upstream control station's turbidity at the same tide of the same day*

* Remarks:  Reference is made to EPD approval of adjustment of water quality assessment criteria issued and became
            effective on 18 February 2013.
 
Notes:     1. ¡§depth-averaged¡¨ is calculated by taking the arithmetic means of reading of all three depths.

2.For DO, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the limits.

3.For turbidity, SS, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limits.

4.All the figures given in the table are used for reference only and the EPD may amend the figures whenever it is considered as necessary.

5.The 1%-ile of baseline data for dissolved oxygen (surface and middle) and dissolved oxygen (bottom) are 4.2 mg/L and 3.6 mg/L respectively.

 

2.3.4      The Action and Limit Levels for Chinese White Dolphin Monitoring are provided in Table 2.8 and Table 2.9, respectively.

Table 2.8           Action and Limit Levels for Chinese White Dolphin Monitoring - Approach to Define Action Level (AL) and Limit Level (LL)

 

North Lantau Social Cluster

 

NEL

NWL

Action Level

(STG  < 70% of baseline) &

(ANI  < 70% of baseline)

(STG  < 70% of baseline) &

(ANI  < 70% of baseline)

Limit Level

[(STG  < 40% of baseline) & (ANI  < 40% of baseline)] AND

[ (STG  < 40% of baseline) & (ANI  < 40% of baseline)]

Table 2.9          Derived Value of Action Level (AL) and Limit Level (LL) for Chinese White Dolphin Monitoring

 

North Lantau Social Cluster

 

NEL

NWL

Action Level

(STG < 4.2) & (ANI < 15.5)

(STG < 6.9) & (ANI < 31.3)

Limit Level

[(STG < 2.4) & (ANI <8.9)] AND [ (STG < 3.9) & (ANI < 17.9)]

2.4                Event Action Plans

2.4.1      The Event and Action Plans for air quality, noise, water quality and impact dolphin monitoring are provided in Appendix D.

2.5                Mitigation Measures

2.5.1      Environmental mitigation measures for the contract were recommended in the approved EIA Report. Appendix E lists the recommended mitigation measures and the implementation status.


3          Environmental Monitoring and Audit

3.1                Air Quality Monitoring Results

3.1.1      Air quality monitoring works at AMS2 were conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. The air quality monitoring works at AMS2 are conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018.

3.1.2      The air quality monitoring works at AMS3B were conducted Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 September 2017 to 19 August 2018. The air quality monitoring station at AMS3B was relocated and renamed as AMS3C. The air quality monitoring works at AMS3C are conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 20 August 2018.

3.1.3      The air quality monitoring work at AMS6 was covered by Contract No. HY/2011/03 ¡§Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road ¡V Section between Scenic Hill and HKBCF¡¨ from 26 September 2014 to 31 January 2019.

3.1.4      The air quality monitoring work at AMS7/AMS7A were conducted by Contract No. HY/2010/02 from 26 September 2014 to 31 August 2017. The air quality monitoring works at AMS7 were conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 September 2017 to 31 January 2018. The air quality monitoring station at AMS7 was relocated and renamed as AMS7B. The air quality monitoring works at AMS7B were conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 February 2018 to 30 September 2018. The air quality monitoring works at AMS7B were conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018.

3.1.5      The monitoring results of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS6 are reported in the monthly EM&A report prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03 (from September 2014 to January 2019) during the reporting period.

3.1.6      The monitoring results of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS7/AMS7A are reported in the monthly EM&A report (from September 2014 to August 2017) prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02.

3.1.7      According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, the monitoring results for 1-hour and 24-hour of TSP from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 at AMS2, AMS3B/AMS3C and AMS7/AMS7B which are summarized in Table 3.1 and Table 3.2 respectively. The graphical plots of the monitoring results from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 are presented in Appendix F. No specific trend of the monitoring results or existence of persistent pollution source was noted.

3.1.8      The monitoring results for 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS2, AMS3C and AMS7B are reported in the monthly EM&A report that prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04 from October 2018 to January 2019.

Table 3.1    Summary of 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018

Monitoring Period

Monitoring Station

Average (£gg/m3)

Range (£gg/m3)

 

Action Level (£gg/m3)

Limit Level (£gg/m3)

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

AMS2

48

4 - 312

374

500

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

AMS3B/AMS3C(1)

32

1 - 137

368

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

AMS7/AMS7B

48

1 -335

370

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remark:

(1) The monitoring data for AMS3C recorded between 20 August 2018 and 30 September 2019 are reported in the monthly EM&A reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/01 thought the implementation of air quality monitoring work at AMS3C was undertaken by the Contract No. HY/2013/04.

 

Table 3.2          Summary of 24-hour TSP Monitoring Results from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018

Reporting Period

Monitoring Station

Average (£gg/m3)

Range (£gg/m3)

 

Action Level (£gg/m3)

Limit Level (£gg/m3)

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

AMS2

66

16 - 184

176

260

1 Sep 2017 to 19 Aug 2018

AMS3B/AMS3C(1)

66

13 - 183

167

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

AMS7/AMS7B

82

26 - 172

183

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remark:

(1) The monitoring data for AMS3C recorded between 20 Aug 2018 and 30 Sep 2019 are reported in the monthly EM&A reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/01 thought the implementation of air quality monitoring work at AMS3C was undertaken by the Contract No. HY/2013/04.

 

3.1.9      Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS6 shall be referred to the monthly EM&A Reports (from September 2014 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and no Limit Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level at AMS7/AMS7A from September 2014 to August 2017 were recorded by Contract No. HY/2010/02. One Action Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level at AMS7A from September 2014 to August 2017 were recorded by Contract No. HY/2010/02. As the exceedance was not referred by Contract No. HY/2010/02 to Contract No. HY/2013/01, the exceedance was not reported in the corresponding Monthly EM&A report prepared by this Contract.

3.1.10    According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and no Limit level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level were recorded from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. Three Action Level exceedances of 24-hr TSP Level at AMS3B and one Action Level of 24-hr TSP level were recorded at AMS2 from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. After investigation, all exceedances were not related to the Contract No. HY/2013/01. Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level are tabulated in Table 3.3.

Table 3.3           Summary of the Air Quality Action/Limit Level Exceedances

Parameter

Number of Exceedances

Action Level

Limit Level

1-hr TSP

0

0

24-hr TSP

4

0

 

3.1.11    Summary of 1-hr TSP and 24-hr TSP exceedances at AMS2, AMS3C and AMS7B from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A Report (from October 2018 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level were recorded for the abovementioned period.

3.1.12     A summary of the weather conditions during the reporting period is presented in Table 3.4.

Table 3.4     Summary of Weather Conditions during the Reporting Period

Month

Description

Sep-14

Warmer and drier than usual with rainfall well below average and influenced by tropical cyclone Kalmaegi.

Oct-14

Sunnier than usual with average rainfall.

Nov-14

Overall cloudier yet warmer than usual with slightly below-average rainfall.

Dec-14

Cooler than normal, with spells of cloudy and rainy weather affected by frequent replenishments of the winter monsoon.

Jan-15

With the northeast monsoon bringing dry continental air mass to the south China coast during the month, the weather was sunnier than usual.

Feb-15

Warmer than usual and a month of two halves: mostly fine and dry in the first half, and generally cloudy and humid in the second half.

Mar-15

With a maritime airstream dominating over the coast of Guangdong during the latter half of the month, the weather was warmer than usual.

Apr-15

Characterized by sunny, warm and relative dry weather, in particular during the second half of the month.

May-15

The fourth hottest May since records began in 1884. Affected by active troughs of low pressure in the second half of the month, May 2015 was actually cloudier than usual and rather rainy as well.

Jun-15

This month was the hottest June in Hong Kong since records began in 1884.

Jul-15

This month was warmer and cloudier than usual. With the increase in cloudiness, the total sunshine duration recorded was below normal. The month was also wetter than usual.

Aug-15

August 2015 was hotter and drier than usual. It was the seventh highest temperature for August on record. The monthly total rainfall recorded in August 2015 was only about one-third of the normal figure

Sep-15

Marked by sunny and warm weather with below normal rainfall.

Oct-15

The weather was warmer and wetter than usual, mainly as a result of heavy rain brought by tropical cyclone Mujigae during the first week of the month.

Nov-15

Emerged as the warmest November in Hong Kong since records began in 1884. The month was also drier than usual.

Dec-15

Gloomier and wetter than usual. It was also warmer than usual.

Jan-16

Mainly fine and dry. Unseasonably warm weather was experienced in the first three weeks of the month and intense cold surge with freezing temperatures was recorded in the latter part of the month.

Feb-16

Cooler than usual with frequent replenishment of winter monsoon and drier than usual as affected by dry continental air.

Mar-16

Gloomy, rainy and humid with fluctuating temperatures as affected by the northeast monsoon and a humid maritime airstream competing for dominance over the south China coast. March was cooler and wetter than usual.

Apr-16

Exceptionally humid and gloomy with a maritime airstream trying to exert control over the coastal areas of Guangdong in a change of seasons.

May-16

Warmer and drier than usual.

Jun-16

Rainy with persistent hot weather as a trough of low pressure over southern China edged towards the coast of Guangdong.

Jul-16

Unusually hot and sunny under the influence of an active southerly airstream, and was much drier than usual with less rainfall

Aug-16

Generally rainy with less sunshine than usual.

Sep-16

Gloomier than usual and the weather was unstable with a trough of low pressure lingering over the South China coast.

Oct-16

Marked by record-breaking high mean temperatures, despite a succession of cyclonic systems passing by in the vicinity of Hong Kong.

Nov-16

Warmer and much wetter than usual.

Dec-16

Warmer than usual and the northeast monsoon over the south China coastal areas remained relatively weak for most of the month.

Jan-17

Warmest January in Hong Kong with record-breaking monthly mean temperature.

Feb-17

Cooler than usual.

Mar-17

Marked by fluctuating temperatures and drier than usual weather.

Apr-17

Warmer than usual and also drier than usual despite stormy weather on a few days.

May-17

Weather was hot with sunny periods in first few days. The weather turned generally cloudy with a few showers over mid of May. First Black Rainstorm Warning in 2017 due to heavy showers and squally thunderstorms on 24 May.

Jun-17

Overall warmer and wetter than usual as a result of the very hot weather in early June and the rainy spell in mid-June.

Jul-17

Cloudy with occasional heavy showers and thunderstorms in first few days.  local weather turned fine and progressively became very hot, especially the highest temperature of the month at the Observatory soared to 35.0 degrees on 18 July. Mixture of sunshine, showers and windy weather during end of the month.

Aug-17

The weather was very hot with haze during the month, especially the highest temperature of the month at the Observatory soared to 35.1 degrees on 8 August. Tropical cyclone warning signal no.3 was issued on 1 August.  Tropical cyclone warning signal no.1 was issued on 1, 2 24, 24, 28 and 29 August.

Sep-17

The weather was sunny and hot, with occasional cloudy. Tropical cyclone warning signal no.1 was issued on 2, 3, 4, 23 and 24 September.  Tropical cyclone warning signal no.3 was issued on 3 and 4 September 2017.

Oct-17

Marker by fine and unseasonably hot.  Tropical cyclone warning signal no.8 NE was issued on 15 October.  Tropical cyclone warning signal no.3 was issued on 14 and 15 October.  Tropical cyclone warning signal no.1 was issued on 14, 15 and 16 October.    

Nov-17

Marked cloudy and more humid than usual in November.

Dec-17

The weather was sunny and bright, only traces of rainfall were recorded.

Jan-18

The weather was slightly cooler than usual with light rain patches over the month.

Feb-18

With an intense winter monsoon during the early part of the month, the weather was overall cooler than usual. The weather became fine and bright from middle of the month till to end of the month.

Mar-18

Marked by warm and foggy with sunny period.

Apr-18

The weather was generally fine and warm of first few days of the month. From mid of the month, the weather gradually became mainly fine and hot towards the end of the month apart from isolated showers.

May-18

Hot and dry in the month with a 20- day fine spell that lasted till the end of the month.

Jun-18

The intense heat with windy in first few days of the month. Heavy squally showers were recorded over the territory on 6-8 June. Local weather was a mixture of sunny periods and heavy showers from mid of the month till the end of the month.  Waterspouts were spotted near Cheung Chau on 7 and 22 June. Tropical cyclone warning signal no.3 was issued on 7 and 8 June.  Tropical cyclone warning signal no.1 was issued on 5, 6, 7 and 8 June.

Jul-18

The weather was a mixture of sunshine and showers were recorded in early of the month. Meanwhile, the weather became very hot with occasional squally showers and thunderstorms during mid of the month. The local weather remained generally fine and very hot till end of the month.  Tropical cyclone warning signal no.3 was issued on 17 and 18 July.  Tropical cyclone warning signal no.1 was issued on 16, 23 and 24 July.

Aug-18

Marked by a mixture of sunshine and showers in early of the month. The weather became cloudy with occasional showers and thunderstorms during mid-August. Meanwhile, the weather was hot with sunny periods till end of the month.

Sep-18

A severe typhoon Mangkhut was marked in September 2018, the month was wetter than usual which mainly attributing to the rainfall brought by Mangkhut. The weather was mainly cloudy with occasional showers in early of September. Meanwhile, the weather became windy with squally heavy rain in mid-September. The weather became generally fine, slight cooler and dry towards the end of the month.

Oct-18

The local weather was generally fine and dry and a few rain patches in early of the month. The associated northeast monsoon brought some rain and slightly cooler weather in mid-October. Meanwhile, the weather became brighter with sunny and very dry with cooler till end of the month.

Nov-18

The month was wetter than usual with appreciably cooler and drier.   Tropical cyclone warning signal no.3 was issued on 1 and 2 November. Tropical cyclone warning signal no.1 was issued on 1 and 2 November.

Dec-18

December was much warmer than usual. The weather was generally fine with sunny intervals over the month.

Jan-19

The weather was generally fine with local temperatures rising gradually over the month.

Remark: A summary of the weather conditions during the reporting period are extracted from Hong Kong Observatory¡¦s website (Source: https://www.hko.gov.hk/en/wxinfo/pastwx/mws/mws.htm).

 

Comparison of EM&A results with EIA prediction

3.1.13    The maximum predicted TSP Level under the ¡§Mitigated¡¨ Scenario in the EIA report and the average of impact TSP Level from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 (as calculated using monitoring data in the corresponding monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01) are presented in Table 3.5.

Table 3.5           Maximum Predicted TSP Level under the ¡§Mitigated Scenario¡¨ in the EIA Report and Average of TSP Level from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018

Monitoring station ID for EM&A programme

Location ID in the approved EIA report

Predicted TSP Level (£gg/m3)

Average Impact 1-hour TSP Level (£gg/m3)

Average Impact 24-hour TSP Level (£gg/m3)

1-hour

24-hour

AMS7/AMS7B

Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel

344

92

49

82

Remarks:

(1) The predicted 1-hr TSP and 24-hr TSP Level are extracted from Table 5-8 of the EIA report.

(2) The average of impact TSP Levels from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 are calculated using monitoring data in the corresponding monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01.

 

3.1.14    It is noted that the average 24-hr TSP level at AMS7/AMS7B recorded in the EM&A programme were in similar magnitude as the predicted TSP Level in the EIA report. No TSP level was predicted by the Project EIA at AMS2 and AMS3B/AMS3C and therefore, no comparison of the EM&A data with EIA predictions could be made.

3.2                Noise Monitoring Results

3.2.1      During the reporting period, noise monitoring works at NMS2 and NMS3B were conducted by Contract No. HY/2010/02 from 26 September 2014 to 31 August 2017. The noise monitoring works were conducted by the ET of this Contract at NMS2 from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. The noise monitoring works at NMS2 are conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018. The noise monitoring works were conducted by the ET of this Contract at NMS3B from 1 September 2017 to 19 August 2018. The noise monitoring station at MMS3B were relocated and renamed as NMS3C. The noise monitoring works at NMS3C are conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 20 August 2018.

3.2.2      The monitoring results at NMS2 and NMS3B are reported in the monthly EM&A report (from September 2014 to August 2017) prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02.

3.2.3      According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, the noise monitoring results from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 at NMS2, NMS3B/NMS3C are summarized in Table 3.6. The graphical plots of the monitoring results from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 are presented in Appendix F. No specific trend of the monitoring results or existence of persistent pollution source was noted.

      Table 3.6               Summary of Noise Monitoring Results from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018

Monitoring Period

Monitoring Station

Average, dB(A)

Leq (30min)

Range, dB(A)

Leq (30min)

Limit Level, dB(A)

Leq (30min)

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

NMS2

65

63 ¡V 69

75

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

NMS3B/NMS3C(1) (2)

66

59 - 70

70/65

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Remarks:

(1)    The Limit Level for schools will be applied for NMS3B/NMS3C. Daytime noise Limit Level of 70 dB(A) applies to education institutions, while 65 dB(A) applies during the school examination period.

(2)    The monitoring results for NMS3C recorded between 20 Aug 2018 and 30 Sep 2019 are reported in the monthly EM&A reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/01 thought the implementation of noise monitoring work at NMS3C was undertaken by the Contract No. HY/2013/04.

 

3.2.4      The noise monitoring results at NMS2 and NMS3B are reported in the monthly EM&A report (from October 2018 to January 2019) that prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

3.2.5      No Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded at NMS2 and NMS3B from September 2014 to August 2017 by Contract No. HY/2010/02.

3.2.6      According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded at NMS2 and NMS3B/NMS3C from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. Summary of Action/Limit Level exceedances of noise are tabulated in Table 3.7.

Table 3.7      Summary of the Noise Action/Limit Level Exceedances

Monitoring Period

Monitoring Station

Number of Exceedances

Action Level

Limit Level

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

NMS2

0

0

1 Sep 2017 to 30 Sep 2018

NMS3B/NMS3C(1)

0

0

Remarks: (1) The monitoring results for NMS3C recorded between 20 Aug 2018 and 30 Sep 2019 are reported in the monthly EM&A reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/01 thought the implementation of noise monitoring work at NMS3C was undertaken by the Contract No. HY/2013/04.

 

3.2.7      Summary of noise exceedances at NMS2 and NMS3C from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A report (from October 2018 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded for the abovementioned period.

Comparison of EM&A results with EIA prediction

3.2.8      The EIA predicted that noise emitted by the use of Powered Mechanical Equipment (PME) on site would be the major source of noise impact during construction. The predicted noise Levels under the ¡§Unmitigated¡¨/¡¨Mitigated¡¨ Scenario in the EIA report and the average of impact noise Levels from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 (as calculated using monitoring data in the corresponding monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01) are presented in Table 3.8.

Table 3.8           Predicted Noise Levels in the EIA Report and Average Impact Noise Level from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018

Monitoring station ID for EM&A programme

Location ID in the approved EIA report

Predicted Construction Noise Level (under the ¡§Unmitigated¡¨ Scenario), dB(A) (1)

Predicted Construction Noise Level (under the ¡§Mitigated¡¨ Scenario), dB(A) (1)

Average Impact Noise Level, dB(A), Leq (30mins) (2)

NMS2

N9 - Seaview Crescent

74

 

N.A.(3)

65

NMS3B/NMS3C

N13 - Ho Yu College (Sik Sik Yuen)

71

65

66

Remarks:

(1) The predicted noise level are extracted from Table 6-9 and Table 6-10 of the EIA report.

(2) The average of impact noise level from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 are calculated using monitoring data in the corresponding monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01.

(3) As the predicted noise level under ¡§unmitigated¡¨ scenario was below the Limit Level (75dB(A)) at Seaview Crescent, the construction noise level under ¡§mitigated¡¨ scenario was not predicted.

 

3.2.9      According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded at NMS2 and NMS3B/NMS3C from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. The impact noise level at NMS2 and NMS3B/NMS3C recorded in the EM&A programme were in similar magnitude as the predicted construction noise level in the EIA report.

3.3                Water Quality Monitoring Results

3.3.1      Impact water quality monitoring was carried out to ensure that any deterioration of water quality was detected, and that timely action was taken to rectify the situation. For impact water quality monitoring, measurements were taken in accordance with the Contract Specific EM&A Manual.

3.3.2      The monitoring results for the monitoring stations shown in Table 2.2 were reported in the monthly EM&A Reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02 from November 2016 to August 2017 (marine works for Contract No. HY/2013/01 started in November 2016 and therefore, water quality impact monitoring results are reported from November 2016), Contract No. HY/2013/01 from September 2017 to September 2018, and Contract No. HY/2013/04 from October 2018 to January 2019.

3.3.3      Impact water quality monitoring results and graphical plots from September 2017 to September 2018 are provided in Appendix F. Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedance of dissolved oxygen level, turbidity level and suspended solid level during the reporting period are tabulated in Table 3.9. After Investigation, it was concluded that all exceedances were not related to Contract No. HY/2013/01.

Table 3.9           Summary of the Water Quality Action/Limit Level Exceedances

Reporting Month

 

Number of Exceedances

DO

Turbidity

Suspended Solid

Action Level

Limit Level

Action Level

Limit Level

Action Level

Limit Level

Nov 2016 to Dec 2016(1)

0

0

0

0

12

1

Jan 2017 to Dec 2017

144

34

7

1

53

6

Jan 2018 to Sep 2018

305

71

5

0

27

0

Oct 2018 to Jan 2019(2)

0

0

1

0

11

1

Remarks:

1) Marine works for Contract No. HY/2013/01 started in November 2016 and therefore, water quality exceedances are summarized from November 2016.

2) It is noted that no marine work and marine transportation were being done by the Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 October 2018 to 31 January 2019. The water quality monitoring responsibility under the EM&A programme for the HZMB HKBCF Project has been changed from Contract No. HY/2013/01 to Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018.

 

3.3.4      An Action Level exceedance of turbidity level, 11 Action Level exceedances and one limit level exceedance of suspended solids level were recorded by the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/04 from October 2018 to January 2019. For investigations and the findings with respect to the exceedances from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A Report prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

Comparison of EM&A results with EIA prediction

3.3.5      Results from the sensitive receiver stations were compared with the EIA predictions for the sensitive receivers in the following manner:

¡P         WSR 27 ¡V San Tau Beach SSSI with SR3/SR3(N)

¡P         WSR 22c ¡V Tai Ho Wan Inlet (outside) with SR4(N)

¡P         WSR 25 ¡V Cooling water intake at HK International Airport with SR5/SR5(N)

3.3.6      The average baseline and impact dissolved oxygen level and the level of depletion during impact monitoring from September 2017 to September 2018 at each sensitive receivers are summarized in Table 3.10.

Table 3.10         Comparison of Dissolved Oxygen Levels (Surface & Middle Depth, Bottom Depth) During Baseline and Impact Monitoring Period (from September 2017 to September 2018)

Sensitive Receiver in Baseline Monitoring

Associated Location During Impact Monitoring

Monitoring Depth

Baseline Mean, mg/L

Impact Mean, mg/L (1)

Depletion During Impact Monitoring

Mid-ebb

Mid-flood

Mid-ebb

Mid-flood

Mid-ebb

Mid-flood

SR3*

SR3/SR3(N)^

Surface & Middle

6.8

6.7

6.6

6.6

0.2

0.1

Bottom

-

6.2

6.5

6.6

-

-0.4

SR4

SR4(N)

Surface & Middle

6.1

6.3

6.9

7.0

-0.8

-0.7

Bottom

6.0

6.2

6.7

6.8

-0.7

-0.6

SR5

SR5(N)

Surface & Middle

6.4

6.3

6.6

6.7

-0.2

-0.4

Bottom

6.1

6.1

6.3

6.3

-0.2

-0.2

SR6

SR6

Surface & Middle

6.6

6.5

6.9

6.6

-0.3

-0.1

Bottom

6.2

6.1

6.7

6.5

-0.5

-0.4

SR7

SR7

Surface & Middle

6.3

6.0

6.8

6.7

-0.5

-0.7

Bottom

6.1

5.9

6.7

6.5

-0.6

-0.6

SR10A

SR10A/SR10A(N)^

Surface & Middle

6.0

6.0

6.5

6.2

-0.5

-0.2

Bottom

5.7

5.8

6.4

6.0

-0.7

-0.2

SR10B

SR10B(N)/SR10B(N2)^

Surface & Middle

6.1

6.0

6.4

6.1

-0.3

-0.1

Bottom

6.2

5.8

6.4

6.2

-0.2

-0.4

Remarks:

^ Alternative water quality monitoring stations at SR3, SR10A and SR10B(N) were justified by the ET Leader on 8 November 2017 and verified by IEC on 13 November 2017; and submitted to EPD on 29 November 2017 and it was approved by EPD on 22 December 2017.

*Only mid-depth of DO were monitored at SR3 during mid-ebb tide during baseline monitoring.

(1) The impact mean of dissolved oxygen levels from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 are calculated using monitoring data in the corresponding monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01.

 

3.3.7      According to Section 9.10.7.1 of the EIA Report, the maximum potential instant DO depletion was estimated using the estimated maximum potential increase in suspended solids. The DO depletion was calculated to be 0.4 mg/L at WSR 25 while 0 mg/L at WSR 22c and WSR 27 as stated in Table 9.25g of the EIA Report. Comparing average baseline dissolved oxygen level with EM&A results in Table 3.10, no significant depletion was found at all sensitive receiver locations. It is noted that the average DO level recorded in the EM&A programme were in similar magnitude as the predicted DO depletion in the EIA Report.

3.3.8      According to Section 9.10.7.4 of the EIA report, the DO of the North-western Water Control Zone is generally high with average ranges between 5.7-6.8 mg/L. The impact mean of dissolved oxygen level are within ranges of the DO levels at North-western Water Control Zone (except station SR4(N) and SR6 which the mean of DO level during impact monitoring are slightly higher than baseline monitoring). As such, there was no adverse effect on dissolved oxygen level due to the works of the Contract No. HY/2013/01.

3.3.9      The EIA determined the acceptability of elevations in suspended solids concentration based on the Water Quality Objectives. The Water Quality Objectives for suspended solids for the North Western Water Control Zones were defined as being an allowable elevation of 30% above the ambient level/ background. The ambient and tolerance values for suspended solids concentrations in the vicinity of sensitive receivers adopted in Table 9.11 of the EIA Report are presented in Table 3.11.

Table 3.11         Ambient and Tolerance Values for Suspended Solids Concentration in the Vicinity of Sensitive Receivers adopted in the EIA

Sensitive Receiver in EIA Report

Associated EPD Station

Ambient Level, mg/L

Tolerance value (30% Tolerance)

Dry Season

Wet Season

Dry Season

Wet Season

WSR 27

NM5,6,8

8.3

5.6

2.5

1.7

WSR 22c

NM1,2,3

5.5

3.7

1.7

1.1

WSR 25

NM4,2,3

5.5

3.7

1.7

1.1

 

3.3.10    The use of single layer silt curtain system has been modelled in the 2012 ¡§mitigated¡¨ scenario. The predicted suspended sediment concentrations under the 2012 mitigated scenario of the Contract as shown in Table 9.22 in the EIA Report are summarized in Table 3.12.

Table 3.12         Calculated Elevations in Suspended Solids Concentrations at Sensitive Receivers under the 2012 ¡§mitigated¡¨ scenario from the EIA Report

Sensitive Receiver in EIA Report

Associated Location During Impact Monitoring

Calculated Elevation, mg/L

Dry Season

Wet Season

WSR 27

SR3/SR3(N)^

0.0

0.0

WSR 22c

NM1,2,3

0.1

0.0

WSR 25

NM4,2,3

3.0

2.7

 

3.3.11    For suspended solids, as the baseline monitoring was conducted in October 2011 which is the transitional season or just the start of dry season while no data were recorded in the wet season, direct comparison with the EIA predictions could not be made. The comparison of EM&A results with baseline results in the following paragraphs was based on the criteria of acceptability of 30 percent elevations above the ambient level/ background as defined in the Water Quality Objectives which was also used in scenario predictions in the EIA report.

3.3.12    The mean baseline suspended solids level at each sensitive receivers and 30% of the baseline mean are present in Table 3.13.

Table 3.13         Average Suspended Solid Levels during Baseline Monitoring and 30% of Baseline Mean

Sensitive Receiver in Baseline Monitoring

Associated Location During Impact Monitoring

Baseline Mean, mg/L

30% of Baseline Mean

Mid-ebb

Mid-flood

Mid-ebb

Mid-flood

SR3*

SR3/SR3(N)^

14

16.3

4.2

4.9

SR4

SR4(N)

11.3

12.2

3.4

3.7

SR5

SR5(N)

10.6

11.9

3.2

3.6

SR6

SR6

11.9

11.9

3.6

3.6

SR7

SR7

11.4

10.4

3.4

3.1

SR10A

SR10A/SR10A(N)^

10.2

10.2

3.1

3.1

SR10B

SR10B(N)/SR10B(N2)^

11.5

11.1

3.5

3.3

 

3.3.13    The elevations in suspended solids concentrations during impact monitoring period from September 2017 to September 2018 at each sensitive receivers are compared with the baseline level are summarized in Table 3.14.

Table 3.14         Average of Suspended Solids Level During Impact Monitoring from September 2017 to September 2018 and Elevations in Suspended Solids Concentrations During Impact Monitoring Period

Sensitive Receiver in Baseline Monitoring

Associated Location During Impact Monitoring

Impact Mean, mg/L

Elevation

Mid-ebb

Mid-flood

Mid-ebb

Mid-flood

SR3*

SR3/SR3(N)^

10.7

9.8

-3.3

-6.5

SR4

SR4(N)

8.8

12.3

-2.5

0.1

SR5

SR5(N)

8.3

11.6

-2.3

-0.3

SR6

SR6

10.0

11.8

-1.9

-0.1

SR7

SR7

8.1

10.9

-3.3

0.5

SR10A

SR10A/SR10A(N)^

6.1

7.3

-4.1

-2.9

SR10B

SR10B(N)/SR10B(N2)^

6.6

8.5

-4.9

-2.6

Remarks: (1) The impact mean of suspended solid level from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018 are calculated using monitoring data in the corresponding monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01.

 

3.3.14    The elevation in suspended solids levels were below 30% of the baseline suspended solid levels at all stations. Regional influences would have effects on deterioration in water quality than activities at the works site. Despite some exceedances were recorded from September 2017 to September 2018, all SS exceedances were not related to Contract No. HY/2013/01 after investigation.  

3.4                Dolphins Monitoring Results

Data Analysis

3.4.1      Distribution Analysis ¡V The line-transect survey data was integrated with the Geographic Information System (GIS) in order to visualize and interpret different spatial and temporal patterns of dolphin distribution using sighting positions. Location data of dolphin groups were plotted on map layers of Hong Kong using a desktop GIS (ArcView© 3.1) to examine their distribution patterns in details. The dataset was also stratified into different subsets to examine distribution patterns of dolphin groups with different categories of group sizes, young calves and activities.

3.4.2      Encounter rate analysis ¡V Encounter rates of Chinese white dolphins (number of on-effort sightings per 100 km of survey effort, and total number of dolphins sighted on-effort per 100 km of survey effort) were calculated in NEL and NWL survey areas in relation to the amount of survey effort conducted during each month of monitoring survey. Dolphin encounter rates were calculated in two ways for comparisons with the HZMB baseline monitoring results as well as to AFCD long-term marine mammal monitoring results.

3.4.3      Notably, the previous monitoring data obtained under Contract No. HY/2011/03 (i.e. HKLR03) are referenced and compared to the quarterly monitoring data collected for the HKBCF-PCB project, as both HKBCF-PCB and HKLR03 project data was collected by the same HKCRP survey team, to ensure 100% consistency in monitoring methodology including vessel survey method as well as various analyses. On the contrary, the previous monitoring data collected under HZMB HKBCF-Reclamation Works contract (Contract No. HY/2010/02) was from a different survey team that have adopted different survey methodology (e.g. two observers and one data recorder under HKBCF-Reclamation Works contract, as compared to one primary observer and one data recorder under HKLR03 and HKBCF-PCB contract). Therefore, the previous HKLR03 monitoring data was adopted for comparison with the quarterly data/findings recorded by HKBCF-PCB project. This approach was also adopted in previous four verified quarterly reports (i.e. EM&A quarterly reports no. 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th).

3.4.4      Firstly, for the comparison with the HZMB baseline monitoring results, the encounter rates were calculated using primary survey effort alone, and only data collected under Beaufort 3 or below condition would be used for encounter rate analysis. The average encounter rate of sightings (STG) and average encounter rate of dolphins (ANI) were deduced based on the encounter rates from six events during the present quarter (i.e. six sets of line-transect surveys in North Lantau), which was also compared with the one deduced from the six events during the baseline period (i.e. six sets of line-transect surveys in North Lantau). 

3.4.5      Secondly, the encounter rates were calculated using both primary and secondary survey effort collected under Beaufort 3 or below condition as in AFCD long-term monitoring study. The encounter rate of sightings and dolphins were deduced by dividing the total number of on-effort sightings (STG) and total number of dolphins (ANI) by the amount of survey effort for the present quarterly period.

3.4.6      Quantitative grid analysis on habitat use ¡V To conduct quantitative grid analysis of habitat use, positions of on-effort sightings of Chinese White Dolphins collected during the quarterly impact phase monitoring period were plotted onto 1-km2 grids among NWL and NEL survey areas on GIS.  Sighting densities (number of on-effort sightings per km2) and dolphin densities (total number of dolphins from on-effort sightings per km2) were then calculated for each 1 km by 1 km grid with the aid of GIS. Sighting density grids and dolphin density grids were then further normalized with the amount of survey effort conducted within each grid.  The total amount of survey effort spent on each grid was calculated by examining the survey coverage on each line-transect survey to determine how many times the grid was surveyed during the study period.  For example, when the survey boat traversed through a specific grid 50 times, 50 units of survey effort were counted for that grid.  With the amount of survey effort calculated for each grid, the sighting density and dolphin density of each grid were then normalized (i.e. divided by the unit of survey effort). 

3.4.7      The newly-derived unit for sighting density was termed SPSE, representing the number of on-effort sightings per 100 units of survey effort. In addition, the derived unit for actual dolphin density was termed DPSE, representing the number of dolphins per 100 units of survey effort.  Among the 1-km2 grids that were partially covered by land, the percentage of sea area was calculated using GIS tools, and their SPSE and DPSE values were adjusted accordingly. The following formulae were used to estimate SPSE and DPSE in each 1-km2 grid within the study area:

SPSE = ((S / E) x 100) / SA%

DPSE = ((D / E) x 100) / SA%

 

where       S = total number of on-effort sightings

D = total number of dolphins from on-effort sightings

E = total number of units of survey effort

SA% = percentage of sea area

3.4.8      Behavioural analysis ¡V When dolphins were sighted during vessel surveys, their behaviour was observed. Different activities were categorized (i.e. feeding, milling/resting, traveling, socializing) and recorded on sighting datasheets. This data was then input into a separate database with sighting information, which can be used to determine the distribution of behavioural data with a desktop GIS. Distribution of sightings of dolphins engaged in different activities and behaviours would then be plotted on GIS and carefully examined to identify important areas for different activities of the dolphins. 

3.4.9      Ranging pattern analysis ¡V Location data of individual dolphins that occurred during the 3-month impact phase monitoring period were obtained from the dolphin sighting database and photo-identification catalogue. To deduce home ranges for individual dolphins using the fixed kernel methods, the program Animal Movement Analyst Extension, was loaded as an extension with ArcView© 3.1 along with another extension Spatial Analyst 2.0. Using the fixed kernel method, the program calculated kernel density estimates based on all sighting positions and provided an active interface to display kernel density plots. The kernel estimator then calculated and displayed the overall ranging area at 95% UD level.

Summary of Survey Effort and Dolphin Sightings

3.4.10    Impact dolphin monitoring results at all transects are reported in the EM&A Reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02 from November 2016 to August 2017.

3.4.11    Impact dolphin monitoring results at all transects are reported in the EM&A Reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/01 from September 2017 to September 2018.

3.4.12    Impact dolphin monitoring results at all transects are reported in the EM&A Reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04 from October 2018 to January 2019.

Action Level / Limit Level Exceedance

3.4.13    The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02 (from September 2016 to August 2017).

3.4.14    Four Limit Level exceedances of impact dolphin monitoring for the quarterly monitoring data were recorded by Contract No. HY/2013/01 from September 2017 to August 2018. Summary of dolphin Action and Limit Level exceedances are summarized in Table 3.15.

Table 3.15         Summary of Dolphin Action/Limit Level Exceedances

Parameter

Action Level

Limit Level

Quarterly Analysis (Sep 2017 to Nov 2017)

0

1

Quarterly Analysis (Dec 2017 to Feb 2018)

0

1

Quarterly Analysis (Mar 2018 to May 2018)

0

1

Quarterly Analysis (Jun 2018 to Aug 2018)

0

1

 

3.4.15    The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances from September 2018 to November 2018 can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A report for October 2018 to November 2018 prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

3.5                Implementation of Environmental Measures

3.5.1      In response to the site audit findings, the Contractors carried out corrective actions. Details of site audit findings and the corrective actions during the reporting period are presented in monthly EM&A Reports (from September 2014 to January 2019) for Contract No. HY/2013/01. 

3.5.2      The Contractor implemented the required environmental mitigation measures according to the Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual. Environmental mitigation measures implemented during the construction phase are summarized in Appendix E. 

3.5.3      The implementation of mitigation measures for landscape and visual resources recommended in the EIA Report were monitored during the reporting period (until 31 October 2018). Landscape and visual mitigation measures in accordance with the EP, EIA and EM&A Manual were implemented by the Contractor.

3.6               Advice on the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status

3.6.1      The Contractor of Contract No. HY/2013/01 registered as a chemical waste producer for the Contract. Sufficient numbers of receptacles were available for general refuse collection and sorting. 

3.6.2      Excavated marine sediment was generated and treated using cement solidification/stabilization (Cement S/S) techniques and was reused onsite for either backfilling or landscaping (e.g. berm material) during the reporting period.

3.6.3      The summary of waste flow table is detailed in Appendix G.

3.7               Site Inspection

3.7.1      Weekly environmental site inspection for the Contract No. HY/2013/01 (includes the construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area) were carried out to monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the Contracts. During the reporting period, 214 site inspections were carried out.  

3.7.2      All work site areas under Contract No. HY/2013/01 have been handed over to the relevant responsible parties since 24 October 2018 and the site areas have been changed to closed area. No environmental site inspection was conducted for the Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 November 2018 to 31 January 2019. It is noted that there were no ad-hoc construction works raised by the Contractor and thus no environmental site inspection was conducted from 1 November 2018 to 31 January 2019.


4          Summary of Exceedance, Complaint, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution

4.1               Summary of Exceedance of the Environmental Quality Performance Limit

4.1.1      For air quality monitoring, summary of Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hour TSP level and 24-hour TSP level at AMS6 are referred to the monthly EM&A report (from September 2014 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and no Limit Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level at AMS7/AMS7A from September 2014 to August 2017 were recorded by Contract No. HY/2010/02. One Action Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level at AMS7A from September 2014 to August 2017 were recorded by Contract No. HY/2010/02. As the exceedance was not referred by Contract No. HY/2010/02 to Contract No. HY/2013/01, the exceedance was not reported in the corresponding Monthly EM&A report prepared by this Contract. According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and no Limit level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level were recorded at AMS2, AMS3B/AMS3C, AMS7/AMS7B from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. Three Action Level exceedances of 24-hr TSP Level at AMS3B and one Action Level of 24-hr TSP level were recorded at AMS2 from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. Summary of 1-hr TSP and 24-hr TSP exceedances at AMS2, AMS3C and AMS7B from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A Report prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level were recorded for the abovementioned period.

4.1.2      Nosie exceedances at NMS2 and NMS3B from September 2014 to August 2017 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A report (from September 2014 to August 2017) prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02. According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring at NMS2 and NMS3B/NMS3C were recorded from September 2017 to September 2018. Summary of noise exceedances at NMS2 and NMS3C from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A report (from October 2018 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded for the abovementioned period.

4.1.3      Marine works for Contract No. HY/2013/01 started in November 2016 and therefore, water quality exceedances are summarized from November 2016. 449 Action Level and 105 Limit Level exceedances of dissolved oxygen level, 13 Action Level and 1 Limit Level exceedances of turbidity level and 103 Action Level and 8 Limit Level exceedances of suspended solid level were recorded during the reporting period. It is noted that no marine work and marine transportation were being done by the Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 October 2018 to 31 January 2019. Summary of investigations and the findings with respect to the exceedances of water quality monitoring from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A Report prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

4.1.4      The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02 (from September 2016 to August 2017). Four Limit Level exceedances of impact dolphin monitoring for the quarterly monitoring data were recorded by Contract No. HY/2013/01 from September 2017 to August 2018. The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances from September 2018 to November 2018 can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A report for October 2018 to November 2018 prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

4.2               Summary of Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution

4.2.1      There were 11 complaints received in relation to the environmental impact during the reporting period. The summary of environmental complaints is presented in Table 4.1. The details of cumulative statistics of environmental complaints are provided in Appendix H.

Table 4.1         Summary of Environmental Complaints

Complaint No.

Complaint Received Date

Category

Status

1

22 May 2015

Air Quality and Noise

Closed

 

2

13 Jul 2015

7

Noise

Closed

 

3

7 Nov 2016

Water Quality

Closed

 

4

5 Dec 2016

Dust Nuisance

Closed

 

5

14 Dec 2016

Noise

Closed

 

6

28 Mar 2017

Noise and Water Quality

Closed

 

7

2 Jun 2017

Dust Nuisance

Closed

 

8

6 Jun 2017

Dust Nuisance

Closed

 

9

27 Oct 2017

Water Quality

Closed

 

10

23 Nov 2017

Dust Nuisance

Closed

 

11

25 Jun 2018

Water Quality

Closed

 

 

4.2.2      The detailed summary and investigation result of the complaints can be found in their respective monthly EM&A reports.

4.2.3      No notification of summons and prosecution was received during the reporting period.

4.2.4      Statistics on notifications of summons and successful prosecutions are summarized in Appendix H.


5          Review of the Validity of the EIA Predication

For air quality monitoring

5.1.1      Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS6 shall be referred to the monthly EM&A Reports (from September 2014 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and no Limit Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level at AMS7/AMS7A from September 2014 to August 2017 were recorded by Contract No. HY/2010/02. One Action Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level at AMS7A from September 2014 to August 2017 were recorded by Contract No. HY/2010/02. As the exceedance was not referred by Contract No. HY/2010/02 to Contract No. HY/2013/01, the exceedance was not reported in the corresponding Monthly EM&A report prepared by this Contract.

5.1.2      According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and no Limit level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level were recorded from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. Three Action Level exceedances of 24-hr TSP Level at AMS3B and one Action Level of 24-hr TSP level were recorded at AMS2 from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. After investigation, all exceedances were not related to the Contract No. HY/2013/01.

5.1.3      Summary of 1-hr TSP and 24-hr TSP exceedances at AMS2, AMS3C and AMS7B from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A Report prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level were recorded for the abovementioned period.

5.1.4      After investigation, all exceedances recorded during the reporting period were not related to the Contract No. HY/2013/01. The results are generally in line with EIA prediction that dust generation would be controlled and would not exceed the acceptable criteria, with proper implementation of the recommended dust mitigation measures.

For construction noise monitoring

5.1.5      No Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded at NMS2 and NMS3B from September 2014 to August 2017 by Contract No. HY/2010/02.

5.1.6      According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded at NMS2 and NMS3B/NMS3C from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018.

5.1.7      Summary of noise exceedances at NMS2 and NMS3C from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A report (from October 2018 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded for the abovementioned period.

5.1.8      The results are in line with the EIA Prediction that with the implementation of noise mitigation measures, the construction noise from the Contract works will meet the stipulated criterion at the residential / educational noise sensitive receivers as predicted by the EIA. 

For water quality monitoring

5.1.9      Impact water quality monitoring results and graphical plots from September 2017 to September 2018 are provided in Appendix F. Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedances of dissolved oxygen level, turbidity level and suspended solid level during the reporting period are tabulated in Table 5.1. After Investigation, it was concluded that all exceedances were not related to Contract No. HY/2013/01.

 

Table 5.1         Summary of the Water Quality Action/Limit Level Exceedances

Reporting Month

Number of Exceedances

DO

Turbidity

Suspended Solids

Action Level

Limit Level

Action Level

Limit Level

Action Level

Limit Level

Nov 2016 to Dec 2016(1)

0

0

0

0

12

1

Jan 2017 to Dec 2017

144

34

7

1

53

6

Jan 2018 to Sep 2018

305

71

5

0

27

0

Oct 2018 to Jan 2019(2)

0

0

1

0

11

1

Remarks:

1) Marine works for Contract No. HY/2013/01 started in November 2016 and therefore, water quality exceedances are summarized from November 2016.

2) It is noted that no marine work and marine transportation were being done by the Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 October 2018 to 31 January 2019. The water quality monitoring responsibility under the EM&A programme for the HZMB HKBCF Project has been changed from Contract No. HY/2013/01 to Contract No. HY/2013/04 since 1 October 2018.

 

5.1.10    An Action Level exceedance of turbidity level, 11 Action Level exceedances and one limit level exceedance of suspended solids level were recorded by the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/04 from October 2018 to January 2019. For investigations and the findings with respect to the exceedances from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A Report prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

5.1.11    After investigation, it was concluded that all exceedances were not related to Contract No. HY/2013/01. The results are generally in line with the EIA Prediction that water quality impact would be controlled and would not exceed the acceptable criteria, with proper implementation of the recommended water quality mitigation measures. 

 

 

 


6          Comments, Recommendations and Conclusion

6.1               Comments

6.1.1      During the reporting period, 214 environmental site inspections were carried out to monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the Contracts. All work site areas under the Contract No. HY/2013/01 have been handed over to the relevant responsible parties since 24 October 2018 and the site areas have been changed to closed area. No environmental site inspection was conducted for the Contract No.  HY/2013/01 from 1 November 2018 to 31 January 2019.

6.1.2      Particular observations during the site inspections are described in the monthly EM&A Reports for Contract No. HY/2013/01 (from September 2014 to January 2019). The Contractor rectified the observations as identified during environmental site inspections during the reporting period. With implementation of the recommended environmental mitigation measures listed in the approved EIA Report, EM&A Manual and EP, the contract¡¦s environmental impacts were considered environmentally acceptable. The weekly environmental site inspections ensured that the environmental mitigation measures recommended were effectively implemented.

6.1.3      A summary of the Implementation Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures (EMIS) is presented in Appendix E. All necessary mitigation measures were implemented properly during the reporting period.

6.2               Recommendations

6.2.1      The recommended environmental mitigation measures, as included in the EM&A programme, effectively minimize the potential environmental impacts from the Contracts. Also, the EM&A programme effectively monitored the environmental impacts from the construction activities and ensure the proper implementation of mitigation measures. The EM&A programme is considered to be cost effective. No particular recommendation was advised for the improvement of the EM&A programme.

6.3               Conclusions

6.3.1      The site preparation work of the Contract started on 26 September 2014 and the construction works of the Contract commenced on 6 October 2014. The construction works of the Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area commenced on 20 February 2018. This is the Final EM&A Review Report which summaries the findings of EM&A works under the Contract No. HY/2013/01 (includes the construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area) during the reporting period from 26 September 2014 to 31 January 2019.

6.3.2      For air quality monitoring, summary of Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hour TSP level and 24-hour TSP level at AMS6 are referred to the monthly EM&A report (from September 2014 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and no Limit Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level at AMS7/AMS7A from September 2014 to August 2017 were recorded by Contract No. HY/2010/02. One Action Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level at AMS7A from September 2014 to August 2017 were recorded by Contract No. HY/2010/02. As the exceedance was not referred by Contract No. HY/2010/02 to Contract No. HY/2013/01, the exceedance was not reported in the corresponding Monthly EM&A report prepared by this Contract. According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and no Limit level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level were recorded at AMS2, AMS3B/AMS3C, AMS7/AMS7B from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. Three Action Level exceedances of 24-hr TSP Level at AMS3B and one Action Level of 24-hr TSP level were recorded at AMS2 from 1 September 2017 to 30 September 2018. After investigation, all exceedances were not related to the Contract No. HY/2013/01. Summary of 1-hr TSP and 24-hr TSP exceedances at AMS2, AMS3C and AMS7B from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A Report prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level were recorded for the abovementioned period.

6.3.3      Nosie exceedances at NMS2 and NMS3B from September 2014 to August 2017 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A report (from September 2014 to August 2017) prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02. According to the monthly EM&A report for Contract No. HY/2013/01, no Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring at NMS2 and NMS3B/NMS3C were recorded from September 2017 to September 2018. Summary of noise exceedances at NMS2 and NMS3C from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A report (from October 2018 to January 2019) prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04. No Action and Limit Level exceedances of noise monitoring were recorded for the abovementioned period.

6.3.4      Marine works for Contract No. HY/2013/01 started in November 2016 and therefore, water quality exceedances are summarized starting from November 2016. 449 Action Level and 105 Limit Level exceedances of dissolved oxygen level, 13 Action Level and 1 Limit Level exceedances of turbidity level and 103 Action Level and 8 Limit Level exceedances of suspended solid level were recorded during the reporting period. After Investigation, it was concluded that all exceedances were not related to Contract No. HY/2013/01. It is noted that no marine work and marine transportation were being done by the Contract No. HY/2013/01 from 1 October 2018 to 31 January 2019. For investigations and the findings with respect to the exceedances of water quality monitoring from October 2018 to January 2019 can be referred to the corresponding monthly EM&A Report prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

6.3.5      The details of the impact dolphin monitoring exceedances can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A reports prepared by Contract No. HY/2010/02 (from September 2016 to August 2017). Four Limit Level exceedances of dolphin monitoring for the quarterly monitoring data were recorded by Contract No. HY/2013/01 from September 2017 to August 2018. The details of the dolphin monitoring exceedances from September 2018 to November 2018 can be referred to corresponding Quarterly EM&A report for October 2018 to November 2018 prepared by Contract No. HY/2013/04.

6.3.6      Environmental site inspections were carried out for the Contract No. HY/2013/01 (includes the construction works of Contract No. HY/2013/06 within Contract No. HY/2013/01 works area) during the reporting period. The weekly environmental site inspections ensured that the environmental mitigation measures recommended were effectively implemented.

6.3.7      There were 11 complaints received in relation to the environmental impact during the reporting period. After investigation, most of the complaints were not related to Contract No. HY/2013/01. For the complaints which were related to the Contract No. HY/2013/01, the Contactor was reminded to implement all necessary mitigation as specified in EIA, EM&A Manual, Environmental Management Plan, method statement, general and particular specification of the Contract.

6.3.8      No notification of summons and successful prosecution was received during the reporting period.

6.3.9      After investigation, all exceedances of air quality and water quality were not related to Contract No. HY/2013/01. The results are generally in line with the EIA Prediction that air quality, noise, water quality impact would be controlled and would not exceed the acceptable criteria, with proper implementation of the recommended mitigation measures.

6.3.10    The EM&A programme effectively monitored the environmental impacts from the construction activities and ensure the proper implementation of mitigation measures. The EM&A programme is considered to be cost effective. No particular recommendation was advised for the improvement of the EM&A programme.

6.3.11    As informed by the Contractor, all major construction activities for Contract No. HY/2013/01 have been substantially completed and only minor maintenance works will be carried out on site upon request. All work site areas under Contract No. HY/2013/01 have been handed over to relevant responsible parties since 24 October 2018. The EM&A requirement of landscape soft works for establishment phase was appropriately arranged. After reviewing the existing environmental conditions of the site, it is considered that the potential environmental impacts associated with the remaining works are insignificant and therefore propose to terminate the construction phase EM&A Programme under Contract No. HY/2013/01. Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) verified the proposal for termination of EM&A programme under Contract No. HY/2013/01 on 25 October 2018. According to EPD¡¦s memo reference ( ) in E771/E1/100 dated 1 February 2019 , EPD had no comment on the proposal for termination of EM&A programme for Contract No. HY/2013/01. The construction phase EM&A programme for Contract No. HY/2013/01 was terminated since 1 February 2019.