TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
||||
1 |
1-2 |
|
|||
1.1 |
Basic Project Information |
1 |
|||
1.2 |
Project Organization |
2 |
|||
1.3 |
Construction Programme |
2 |
|||
1.4 |
Construction Works
Undertaken During the Reporting Period |
2 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
2 |
3 |
||||
2.1 |
Monitoring Locations |
3 |
|||
2.2 |
Monitoring Requirements |
3 |
|||
2.3 |
Monitoring Results |
3-4 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
3 |
4 |
||||
3.1 |
Monitoring Locations |
4 |
|||
3.2 |
Monitoring Requirements |
4 |
|||
3.3 |
Monitoring Results |
4 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
4
|
5-7 |
||||
4.1 |
Monitoring Locations |
5 |
|||
4.2 |
Monitoring Requirements |
5-6 |
|||
4.3 |
Monitoring Results |
6-7 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
5
|
7 |
||||
5.1 |
Monitoring Locations |
7 |
|||
5.2 |
Monitoring Requirements |
7 |
|||
5.3 |
Monitoring Results |
7 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
6 |
8-11 |
||||
6.1 |
Site
Inspection |
8 |
|||
6.2 |
Advice on
the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status |
8-9 |
|||
6.3 |
Environmental Licenses and Permits |
9 |
|||
6.4 |
Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation Measures
|
9 |
|||
6.5 |
Summary of Exceedance of the Environmental Quality Performance Limit |
9-10 |
|||
6.6 |
Summary of Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful
Prosecution |
10 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
7 |
10 |
||||
7.1 |
Construction Programme for the Coming Months |
10 |
|||
7.2 |
Environmental Site
Inspection Schedule for the Coming Month |
10 |
|||
|
|
|
|||
8 |
11 |
||||
8.1 |
Conclusions |
11 |
|||
Figure 1 |
Air Quality and Noise Monitoring Stations for HKBCF |
Figure 2 |
Water Quality Monitoring Stations (construction phases) |
Figure 3 |
Dolphin
Monitoring Transect Line
and Layout
Map |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE |
|
Table 1.1 |
Contact Information of Key Personnel |
Table 2.1 |
Air Quality Monitoring Locations |
Table 2.2 |
Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP |
Table 2.3 |
Action and Limit Levels for 24-hour TSP |
Table 3.1 |
Construction Noise Monitoring Locations |
Table 3.2 |
Action and Limit Levels for Construction Noise |
Table 4.1 |
Water Quality Monitoring Stations (construction
phases) |
Table 4.2 |
Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality |
Table 5.1a |
Action and Limit Levels for Chinese White Dolphin
Monitoring ¡V Approach to Define Action Level (AL) and Limit Level (LL) |
Table 5.1b |
Action and Limit Levels for Chinese White Dolphin
Monitoring - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPENDICES |
|
Location of Works Areas |
|
Project Organization for Environmental Works |
|
Construction Programme |
|
Event and Action Plan |
|
Monthly Summery of Waste Flow Table & Monthly
Summery of Marine Sediment |
|
Environmental Licenses and Permits |
|
Implementation Schedule for Environmental
Mitigation Measures (EMIS) |
|
Statistics on Environmental Complaints,
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions |
|
Environmental Site Inspection Schedule |
|
Investigation Reports on Action Level
or Limit Level Non-compliance |
|
Complaint Investigation Report |
This Monthly Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report is
prepared for Contract HY/2013/02 ¡§Hong Kong¡VZhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong
Boundary Crossing Facilities (HKBCF) ¡V Infrastructure Works Stage I (Western
Portion)¡¨ (hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contract¡¨) for the Highways Department
of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). The Contract was awarded to
China Harbour Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contractor¡¨)
and ETS-Testconsult Limited was appointed as the Environmental Team (ET) by the
Contractor.
The Contract is part of
Hong Kong¡VZhuhai¡VMacao Bridge HKBCF which is a ¡§Designated Project¡¨, under
Schedule 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap 499)
and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Register No. AEIAR-145/2009)
was prepared for the Project. The current Environmental Permit (EP) No. EP-353/2009/K for HKBCF was issued on 11 April 2016.
These documents are available through the EIA Ordinance Register. Site
preparation works of the Contract was started on 25 July 2014 and the
construction works of the Contract commenced on 24 November 2014.
ETS-Testconsult Limited
has been appointed by the Contractor to implement the Environmental Monitoring
& Audit (EM&A) programme for the Contract in accordance with the
Updated EM&A Manual for HKBCF (Version 1.0) and provide environmental team
services to the Contract.
This is the Thirty-eighth Monthly Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) Report for the Contract which summaries findings of the
EM&A works conducted during the reporting period from 01 January to 31 January 2018.
Site Activities
As
informed by the Contractor, site
activities were carried out in
this reporting month:
l
Road and Bituminous works;
l
Branch, collector drain,
gully & u-channel;
l
cable trench and ducting;
l
Landscaping work
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
The monthly EM&A programme was
undertaken in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual for HKBCF (Version 1.0).
It should be noted that the air quality and noise monitoring works for the
Contract are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/01 ¡§Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge
HKBCF ¡V Passenger
Clearance Building¡¨ and
Contract No. HY/2011/03 ¡§Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road ¡V
Section between Scenic Hill and HKBCF¡¨. The ET of the Contract or
another ET of the HZMB project is required to conduct impact air quality
monitoring at AMS6 and AMS7, noise monitoring at NMS2 and NMS3B,
water quality monitoring show in Figure 2
and dolphin monitoring
show in Figure 3 as part of EM&A programme
if these monitoring stations are no longer covered under Contract
No. HY/2013/01 and HY/2011/03. However, this is subject to
ENPO¡¦s final decision on which ET should carry out the monitoring works at
these stations. The dates of site inspection during the reporting period are
listed below:
Environmental Site Inspection:
04, 11, 18 & 25 January 2018
Breaches of
Action and Limit Levels
Summary
of Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at
AMS6 shall be referred to the monthly EM&A report prepared by Contract No.
HY/2011/03.
There was no Action and Limit Level exceedance
of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level
recorded at station AMS7 by the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
There were two Action Level exceedances of 24-hr
TSP level recorded at station AMS2 and AMS3B by the
Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period. The Investigation Reports No. 025 (including the
causes of exceedance, action taken and recommendation for mitigation) for
Action or Limit Level Non-compliance were provided in Appendix J.
There was no Action and Limit Level exceedance
for noise recorded at
station NMS2 and station NMS3B by the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01
during the reporting period.
During January 2018, there was one
action level exceedance of suspended solids recorded on 31 January 2018. Since
the removal of temporary loading and unloading point by Contract No.
HY/2013/02, which involved marine work, was completed on 10 September 2017 and
the area was handed back to Reclamation Contractor with Contract No.
HY/2010/02 on 11 September 2017 for subsequent seawall construction as
confirmed by RSS, there was no marine works or barge of this
Contract worked at HKBCF reclamation site near the sea area or area near the
monitoring station under Contract No. HY/2013/02 during January 2018. Hence, specific investigation shall be
referred to other ET¡¦s report(s) under the HZMB Projects in which the
respective contract(s) with remaining marine works on-going for the exceedances
recorded in water quality monitoring during this reporting month. There was
no Action and Limit Level exceedance recorded on other monitoring date at the
monitoring stations showed at Table 4.1 by the Environmental Team of
Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
Complaint Log
Follow-up action to the complaint received by Highways Department on 29 December 2017 and referred to the ENPO
on 08 January 2018. Then the ENPO forwarded the complaint by email to the R.E.
(AECOM), the Contractor (China Harbour) and the ET (ETS-Testconsult Ltd.) of
Contract No. HY/2013/02 at 12:20 on 08 January 2018. After received the details of the complaint from the ENPO, the
Environmental Officers, RE and ET of Contract No. HY/2013/02 have performed a
related follow-up inspection on 10 January
2018 to investigate this event. After
received the details of the complaint from the ENPO, the Environmental
Officers, RE and ET of Contract No. HY/2013/02 have performed a related
follow-up inspection on 10 January 2018 to investigate this event.
The inspection was concentrated to check if any mud/slurry and
dusts produced
from the construction sites
of Contract No. HY/2013/02 originated
to East Coast Road and if any mud/slurry and
dusts accumulated on
the road side of East Coast
Road. After checked with the RE and the Contractor of Contract No. HY/2013/02
during 10:00 to 11:00 on 10 January 2018, the site entrance
was cleaned and no mud/slurry was observed around the East Coast Road site
entrance. Besides, high pressure water jet was provided at
site exit in order to prevent any mud/slurry bringing out from
the site (see attached
photo). The
site entrance situation was acceptable according to the site
inspection on 10 January 2018. In addition,
mitigation measures under the item A2 and W2 of EMIS were implemented including
provide vehicle washing facilities with high pressure water jet, the road
section between the washing facilities and the exit point was hard paved and
reminders were provided at the wheel washing basin and exit to remind all
Contract(s) vehicles using the site exit for proper wheel washing
etc.
To
monitor the implementation of mitigation measures, follow-up site inspections
were performed. Mitigation measures under the item A2 and W2 of EMIS were
implemented and enhanced in order to further improve the condition of the site
entrance and road section between wheel-washing facilities and East Coast Road gate. Manpower was provided to
stop the vehicles when passing the washing facilities in order to lengthen the
washing time. Besides, washing
facilities with high pressure water jet at the area where vehicle washing takes
place was provided. The road section
between the washing facilities and the exit point was hard paved and watering
truck was arranged regularly to clean the road section. Besides washing the haul roads by watering, manpower was also assigned
to remove the accumulated mud/slurry along the haul road section between wheel-washing facilities and East Coast
Road gate (see attached photo) to clean-up the haul road thoroughly in order to avoid mud/slurry from
escaping beyond the East Coast Road gate.
The photos
taken during the
follow-up inspections and the
wheel washing facilities layout plan were attached. The condition of
site exit and the road section from wheel-washing facilities to East Coast Road gate was found to be improved and the situation was acceptable. Hence, the
complaint was found non-related to Contract No. HY/2013/02. The complaint investigation report (Log No. 017) was provided in Appendix K.
Notifications of Summons and Successful
Prosecutions
There were no
notifications of summons or prosecutions received during the reporting period.
Reporting Change
There were no
reporting changes during the reporting period.
Future
Key Issues
The future key
issues to be undertaken in the upcoming month are as follows:
l
Road and Bituminous works;
l
Landscaping work
1.
INTRODUCTION
1.1.
Basic Project Information
1.1.1.
This Monthly Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report is
prepared for Contract HY/2013/02 ¡§Hong Kong¡VZhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong
Boundary Crossing Facilities (HKBCF) ¡V Infrastructure Works Stage I (Western
Portion)¡¨ (hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contract¡¨) for the Highways Department
of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR). The Contract was awarded to
China Harbour Engineering Co., Ltd. (hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contractor¡¨)
and ETS-Testconsult Limited was appointed as the Environmental Team (ET) by the
Contractor.
1.1.2.
The Contract is part of
Hong Kong¡VZhuhai¡VMacao Bridge HKBCF which is a ¡§Designated Project¡¨, under
Schedule 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) (Cap 499)
and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Report (Register No. AEIAR-145/2009)
was prepared for the Project. The current Environmental Permit (EP) No. EP-353/2009/K for HKBCF was issued on 11 April 2016.
These documents are available through the EIA Ordinance Register. Site
preparation works of the Contract started on 25 July 2014 and the construction
works of the Contract commenced on 24 November 2014. The works area of the
Contract is shown in Appendix A.
1.1.3.
The proposed works under this
Contract comprise the following:
l
Construction of the
viaducts and roads at the western portion of Hong Kong Boundary Crossing
Facilities (HKBCF) mainly for connection with the Hong Kong¡VZhuhai¡VMacao
Bridge (HZMB), Hong Kong Link Road (HKLR), Hong Kong International Airport
(HKIA) and the Tuen Mun-Chek Lap Kok Link (TM-CLKL);
l
Construction of the road modification at the
SkyCity Interchange at Airport Island;
l
Construction of associated street lighting,
street furniture, road marking, road signage, drainage, sewerage, fresh water
and flushing water supply, irrigation, landscape, electrical and mechanical
(E&M), utilities and services works;
l
Provisioning of civil engineering works and power
supply installation for the Traffic Control and Surveillance System TCSS;
l
Other works in accordance with the
Contract.
1.1.4.
This is the Thirty-eighth
Monthly
Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report for the Contract which
summaries the audit findings of the EM&A programme during the reporting period from 01 January to 31 January 2018.
1.2.
Project Organization
1.2.1.
The project
organization
structure and lines of communication with respect to the on-site environmental
management structure is shown in Appendix B. The key personnel contact
names and numbers are summarized in Table
1.1.
Table 1.1 Contact Information of Key Personnel
Party |
Position |
Name of Key Staff |
Tel. No. |
Fax No. |
Engineer or Engineer¡¦s Representative (AECOM Asia Co. Ltd.) |
Resident Engineer |
Mr. Winston Wong |
6330 8293 |
3152 5116 |
Environmental Project Office / Independent Environmental Checker (Ramboll Hong Kong Limited*) |
Environmental Project Office Leader |
Mr. Y. H. Hui |
3465 2888 |
3465 2899 |
Independent Environmental Checker |
Mr. Raymond Dai |
3465 2888 |
3465 2899 |
|
Environmental Site Supervisor |
Mr. Ray Yan |
5181 8165 |
3465 2899 |
|
Contractor (China Harbour Engineering Co., Ltd.) |
Environmental Officer |
Mr. Richard Ng |
5977 0593 |
3915 0300 |
Environmental Officer |
Mr. Paper Chan |
6486 8967 |
3915 0300 |
|
Environmental Supervisor |
Mr. Endy Tse |
5512 2662 |
3915 0300 |
|
Environmental
Team (ETS-Testconsult Ltd.) |
Environmental
Team Leader |
Mr. C. L. Lau |
2946
7791 |
2695
3944 |
(*) ¡§Ramboll Environ Hong Kong Limited¡§
was re-branded as ¡§Ramboll Hong Kong
Limited¡¨ since 03 January 2018. |
1.3.
Construction Programme
1.3.1. A copy of the Contractor¡¦s construction programme is provided in Appendix
C.
1.4.
Construction Works Undertaken During the Reporting Period
1.4.1.
A
summary of the construction activities undertaken during this reporting period is
shown below:
l
Road and Bituminous works;
l
Branch, collector drain,
gully & u-channel;
l
cable trench and ducting;
l
Landscaping work
2.1.
Monitoring Locations
2.1.1.
The air quality monitoring works for
the Contract are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/01 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge HKBCF ¡V Passenger Clearance Building and Contract No. HY/2011/03
Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road ¡V Section between Scenic Hill
and HKBCF. The ET of the Contract or another ET of the HZMB project is required
to conduct impact air quality monitoring at AMS6 and AMS7 as part of EM&A
programme if these air quality monitoring stations are no longer covered under
Contract No. HY/2013/01 and HY/2011/03. Table 2.1 and Figure 1 shows the locations of air monitoring
stations.
Table 2.1 Air
Quality Monitoring Locations
Identification No. |
Location Description |
AMS6(1) |
Dragonair /
CNAC (Group)
Building |
AMS7(1) (2) |
Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel |
Remarks: |
|
(1)
The ET of this Contract should conduct impact air quality
monitoring at the AMS listed in the table as part of EM&A programme according
to latest notification from ENPO when the monitoring station(s) is/are no
longer covered by another ET of the HZMB project. |
|
(2)
The air quality monitoring location
AMS7A was relocated back to the original monitoring location AMS7 of
the updated EM&A Manual started from January 2016. |
2.2.
Monitoring Requirements
2.2.1.
The monitoring requirements, monitoring
equipment, monitoring parameters, frequency and duration, monitoring
methodology, monitoring schedule, meteorological information are detailed in
the monthly EM&A Reports prepared for Contract Nos. HY/2013/01 and
HY/2011/03.
2.2.2.
The Action
and Limit Levels for 1-hr TSP and 24-hr TSP are provided in Table 2.2 and Table
2.3 respectively. The Action and Limit Levels of AMS7 are as same as its
original levels and AMS7A.
Table 2.2 Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP
Monitoring Station |
Action Level,mg/m3 |
Limit Level,mg/m3 |
AMS6
¡V Dragnair / SNAC (Group) Building (HKIA) |
360 |
500 |
AMS7
¡V Hong Kong SkyCity
Marriott Hotel |
370 |
500 |
Table
2.3 Action and Limit Levels for 24-hour TSP
Monitoring Station |
Action Level,mg/m3 |
Limit Level,mg/m3 |
AMS6
¡V Dragnair / SNAC (Group) Building (HKIA) |
173 |
260 |
AMS7
¡V Hong Kong SkyCity
Marriott Hotel |
183 |
260 |
2.2.3.
The event and
action plan is provided in Appendix D.
2.2.4.
If
exceedance(s) at these stations is/are recorded by the ET of the Contract or
referred by the other ET under the HZMB project to the Contract, the ET of the
Contract will carry out an investigation and findings will be reported in the
monthly EM&A Report.
2.3.
Monitoring Results
2.3.1.
The
monitoring results for AMS6 and AMS7 are reported in the monthly EM&A
Reports prepared for Contract Nos. HY/2011/03 and HY/2013/01 respectively.
2.3.2.
Summary of Action and
Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS6 shall be
referred to the monthly EM&A report prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03.
2.3.3.
There was no
Action and Limit Level
exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP
level recorded at station AMS7 by the Environmental Team of Contract
No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
2.3.4.
There were two
Action Level exceedances of 24-hr TSP level recorded at station AMS2 and AMS3B by
the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period. The Investigation Reports No. 025 (including the
causes of exceedance, action taken and recommendation for mitigation) for
Action or Limit Level Non-compliance were provided in Appendix J.
2.3.5.
Although the
exceedances were not relevant to this Contract, the Contractor was reminded
to provide appropriate air
quality mitigation measures, such as spray the worksites with water at least 8 times/day, cover
the dusty materials with impervious sheeting.
3.1.
Monitoring
Locations
3.1.1. The noise monitoring works for the Contract are covered by Contract
No. HY/2013/01 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge HKBCF ¡V Passenger
Clearance Building.
The ET of the Contract or another ET of the HZMB project is required to conduct
noise monitoring at NMS2 and NMS3B as part of EM&A programme if these
monitoring stations are no longer covered under Contract No. HY/2013/01. Table 3.1 and Figure 1 shows the locations of noise monitoring stations.
Table
3.1 Construction Noise Monitoring Locations
Identification No. |
Location Description |
NMS2(1) |
Sea
View Crescent |
NMS3B(1) (2) |
Site
Boundary of Site Office Area at Works Area WA2 |
Remarks: |
|
(1)
The ET of this Contract should conduct impact noise monitoring
at the NMS listed in the table as part of EM&A programme according to
latest notification from ENPO when the monitoring station(s) is/are no longer
covered by another ET of the HZMB project. |
|
(2)
The Action and Limit Levels for schools will be applied for this
alternative monitoring location. |
3.2.
Monitoring Requirements
3.2.1.
The monitoring requirements, monitoring
equipment, monitoring parameters, frequency and duration, monitoring
methodology, monitoring schedule, meteorological information are detailed in
the monthly EM&A Reports prepared for Contract No. HY/2013/01.
3.2.2.
The Action and Limit Levels for construction noise are provided in Table 3.2
3.2.3.
The event and action plan is provided in Appendix D.
Table 3.2 Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise
Parameter |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
07:00 ¡V 19:00 hours on normal
weekdays |
When one documented complaint is received |
75 dB(A)* |
Notes: |
||
If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the Noise Control Authority have to be followed. |
||
* Reduce
to 70
dB(A) for schools and 65 dB(A) during school examination period. |
3.2.4.
If exceedance(s) at these stations
is/are recorded by the ET of the Contract or referred by the other ET under the
HZMB project to the Contract, the ET of the Contract will carry out an
investigation and findings will be reported in the monthly EM&A Report.
3.3.
Monitoring
Results
3.3.1
The monitoring
results for NMS2 and NMS3B are reported in the monthly EM&A Reports
prepared for Contract No. HY/2013/01. There was no exceedance for noise recorded at station NMS2 and
station NMS3B by the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
4.1.
Monitoring
Locations
The water monitoring works for the
Contract are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/01 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge
HKBCF ¡V Passenger Clearance Building. The ET of the Contract or another ET of
the HZMB project is required to conduct water quality monitoring at twenty one stations (9 Impact
Stations, 7 Sensitive Receiver Stations and 5 Control/Far Field Stations). Due to topographical conditions of SR3, SR10A and SR10B(N), the water quality monitoring (WQM) stations was proposed
to be monitored at alternative WQM stations named as SR3(N), SR10A (N) and SR10B(N2). The
proposal for alternation of water quality monitoring stations for HZMB HKBCF
was justified by the ET Leader for Contract No. HY/2013/01 on 08 November
2017 and verified by the IEC on 13
November 2017; and submitted to EPD on 29 November 2017, and it was approved by
EPD on 22 December 2017. Table 4.1
and Figure 2 shows the locations
of water quality monitoring stations.
Table 4.1 Water Quality
Monitoring Stations (construction phases)
Station |
Description |
East |
North |
IS5 |
Impact Station
(Close to HKBCF construction site) |
811579 |
817106 |
IS(Mf)6 |
Impact Station
(Close to HKBCF construction site) |
812101 |
817873 |
IS7 |
Impact Station
(Close to HKBCF construction site) |
812244 |
818777 |
IS8 |
Impact Station
(Close to HKBCF construction site) |
814251 |
818412 |
IS(Mf)9 |
Impact Station
(Close to HKBCF construction site) |
813273 |
818850 |
IS10(N) |
Impact Station (Close to HKBCF construction site) |
812942 |
820881 |
IS(Mf)11 |
Impact Station
(Close to HKBCF construction site) |
813562 |
820716 |
IS(Mf)16 |
Impact Station
(Close to HKBCF construction site) |
814328 |
819497 |
IS17 |
Impact Station
(Close to HKBCF construction site) |
814539 |
820391 |
SR3(N)[3] |
Sensitive
receivers (San Tau SSSI) |
810689 |
816591 |
SR4(N) |
Sensitive
receivers (Tai Ho) |
814705 |
817859 |
SR5(N) |
Sensitive receiver (Artificial Reef in NE Airport) |
812569 |
821475 |
SR6 |
Sensitive
receivers (Sha Chau and Lung Kwu Chau Marine Park) |
805837 |
821818 |
SR7 |
Sensitive
receivers (Tai Mo Do) |
814293 |
821431 |
SR10A(N) [1][3] |
Sensitive
receivers (Ma Wan FCZ)1 |
823644 |
823484 |
SR10B(N2) [1][3] |
Sensitive
receivers (Ma Wan FCZ)2 |
823689 |
823159 |
CS(Mf)3(N) |
Control Station |
808814 |
822355 |
CS(Mf)5 |
Control Station |
817990 |
821129 |
CS4 |
Control Station |
810025 |
824004 |
CS6 |
Control Station |
817028 |
823992 |
CSA[2] |
Control Station |
818103 |
823064 |
Note: |
|||
(1) Additional monitoring station for Ma Wan
FCZ. |
|||
(2)
Additional
control monitoring station for Ma Wan FCZ (3)
Alternative
WQM Stations with effect from 22 December
2017 |
|||
Remarks: |
|||
The ET of this Contract should conduct impact water quality
monitoring at the WQMS listed in the table as part of EM&A programme
according to latest notification from ENPO when the monitoring station(s)
is/are no longer covered by another ET of the HZMB project. The ET of the Contract
shall communicate and share the monitoring data to the ET(s) of other works
contracts if the water quality monitoring station(s) is/are as part of
EM&A programme. |
4.2
Monitoring
Requirements
The
monitoring requirements, monitoring equipment, monitoring parameters, frequency
and duration, monitoring methodology, monitoring schedule, meteorological
information are detailed in the monthly EM&A Reports prepared for Contract
No. HY/2013/01.
4.2.1 The event and action plan is provided in Appendix
D.
4.2.2 The Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality are provided in Table 4.2
Table 4.2 Action and Limit
Levels for Water Quality
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
DO in mg/L (Surface, Middle & Bottom) |
Surface and Middle 5.0 Bottom 4.7 |
Surface and Middle 4.2 (except 5 mg/L for FCZ) Bottom 3.6 |
SS in mg/L (depth-averaged) at all monitoring
stations and control stations |
23.5 and 120% of upstream control station's SS at
the same tide of the same day* |
34.4 and 130% of upstream control station's SS at
the same tide of the same day and 10mg/L for WSD Seawater intakes* |
Turbidity in NTU (depth-averaged) |
27.5 and 120% of upstream control station's
turbidity at the same tide of the same day* |
47.0 and 130% of upstream control station's
turbidity at the same tide of the same day* |
* Remarks: Reference is made to EPD
approval of adjustment of water quality assessment criteria issued and became
effective on 18 February 2013. |
||
Notes:
1.
"depth-averaged" is calculated by taking the arithmetic
means of reading of all three depths. |
||
2. For DO, non-compliance of
the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower than the
limits. |
||
3. For turbidity, SS, non-compliance of the
water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is higher than the limits. |
||
4. All the figures given in
the table are used for reference only and the EPD may amend the figures
whenever it is considered as necessary. |
||
5. The 1%-ile of baseline
data for dissolved oxygen (surface and middle) and dissolved oxygen (bottom)
are 4.2mg/L and 3.6mg/L respectively. |
4.2.3 If exceedance(s) at these stations is/are recorded by
the ET of the Contract or referred by the other ET under the HZMB project to
the Contract, the ET of the Contract will carry out an investigation and
findings will be reported in the monthly EM&A Report.
4.3
Monitoring Result
4.3.1 The monitoring results for the monitoring stations showed in Table
4.1 are reported in the monthly EM&A Report prepared for Contract No. HY/2013/01. During January 2018, there was one action level exceedance of suspended solids recorded on 31 January 2018.
4.3.2 Since the removal of temporary loading and unloading point by
Contract No. HY/2013/02, which involved marine work, was completed on 10
September 2017 and the area was handed back to Reclamation Contractor with
Contract No. HY/2010/02 on 11 September 2017 for subsequent seawall
construction as
confirmed by RSS, there was no marine works or
barge of this Contract worked at HKBCF reclamation site near the sea area or
area near the monitoring station under Contract No.
HY/2013/02 during January
2018. Hence,
specific investigation shall be referred to other ET¡¦s report(s) under the HZMB
Projects in which the respective contract(s) with remaining marine works
on-going for the exceedances recorded in water quality monitoring during this
reporting month. There was no Action and Limit Level exceedance recorded
on other monitoring date at the monitoring stations showed at Table 4.1 by
the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
4.3.3
Although the
exceedances were not relevant to this Contract, the Contractor was reminded
to provide appropriate water pollution mitigation measures, such as ensure all
construction activities that would deteriorate the water quality was collected by
sedimentation tanks or package treatment systems for proper treatment prior to
disposal.
5.
DOLPHIN MONITORING
5.1.
Monitoring Locations
The dolphin monitoring works for the Contract are covered by Contract No. HY/2013/01 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge HKBCF ¡V Passenger Clearance Building. The ET of the Contract or
another ET of the HZMB project is required to conduct dolphin monitoring at 24 transects as part of EM&A programme if these transects are no
longer covered under Contract No. HY/2013/01. The dolphin
monitoring should adopt line-transect vessel survey method. The survey
follows pre-set and fixed transect lines in the two areas defined by AFCD as:
Northeast Lantau survey area; and Northwest Lantau survey area. Figure 3 shows
the
co-ordinates for the transect lines and layout map.
5.2.
Monitoring Requirements
The
monitoring requirements, monitoring equipment, monitoring parameters, frequency
and duration, monitoring methodology, monitoring schedule, meteorological
information are detailed in the monthly EM&A Reports prepared for Contract
No. HY/2013/01.
5.2.1.
The event and
action plan is provided in Appendix D.
5.2.2.
The Action and Limit Levels for Chinese White Dolphin Monitoring are provided in Table 5.1a & Table 5.1b
Table 5.1a Action and Limit
Levels for Chinese White Dolphin Monitoring ¡V Approach to
Define
Action Level (AL) and Limit Level (LL)
|
North Lantau Social Cluster |
|
NEL |
NWL |
|
Action Level |
(STG < 70% of baseline) & (ANI < 70% of
baseline) |
(STG < 70% of baseline) & (ANI < 70% of baseline) |
Limit Level |
[(STG < 40% of baseline) & (ANI < 40%
of baseline)] AND [(STG < 40% of baseline) & (ANI <
40% of baseline)] |
For North Lantau Social
Cluster, action level will be trigger if either NEL or NWL fall below the
criteria; limit level will be triggered if both NEL and NWL fall below the
criteria.
Table 5.1b Derived Value of
Action Level (AL) and Limit Level (LL) for Chinese White
Dolphin
Monitoring
|
North Lantau Social Cluster |
|
NEL |
NWL |
|
Action Level |
(STG < 4.2) & (ANI < 15.5) |
(STG < 6.9) & (ANI < 31.3) |
Limit Level |
[(STG < 2.4) & (ANI < 8.9)] AND [(STG
< 3.9) & (ANI < 17.9)] |
5.2.3.
If exceedance(s) at these transects is/are recorded by the ET of the Contract or referred by the other ET under
the HZMB project to the Contract, the ET of the Contract will carry out an
investigation and findings will be reported in the monthly EM&A Report.
5.3
Monitoring Result
The
dolphin survey results for all transects are reported in the monthly
EM&A Reports prepared for Contract No. HY/2013/01.
6.
ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE INSPECTION AND AUDIT
6.1.
Site Inspection
6.1.1. Site Inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the
implementation of proper environmental pollution control mitigation measures
for the project. During the reporting period, site inspections were carried out
on 04, 11, 18 & 25 January 2018.
6.1.2. As confirmed by RSS on 16 January 2018, the
landscape construction works including planting (Shrubs &
Grass), installation of irrigation pipe and soiling (Sub & Top soil) for Contract No. HY/2013/02 were commended on
04 November 2017. The landscape
inspections were conducted on 11 and 25 January
2018 on a bi-weekly basis during the weekly environmental site
inspection. The weekly site inspection checklists including the landscape inspection items would be
submitted to IEC for checking within the reporting period.
6.1.3. During the site
inspections on January 2018, there was no
conflict occurred regarding to the Landscape
& Visual mitigation measures stated in Contract Specific EM&A Manual.
The work site
was found to be confined within site boundaries and grass-hydroseed was
provided for bare soil surface and stock pile areas. Landscape & Visual
mitigate
Measures during construction would be checked to ensure compliance with the intended aims
of the measures.
6.1.4. Particular
observations during the site inspections are described below:
28 December 2017
(a)
Chemical container without drip tray was
observed at Portion C and Portion D. Chemical containers were collected at
Portion C and Portion D. The observation was closed
on 04 January 2018.
(b)
Improper disposal of general refuse was
observed at Portion C. General refuse was collected at Portion C. The observation was closed on 04 January 2018.
04 January 2018
(a)
Chemical containers without drip tray were
observed at Portion D. Chemical
containers were removed at Portion D. The observation was closed
on 11 January 2018.
(b)
Improper disposal of general refuse were
observed at Portion A, B & F. General refuse were collected at Portion A, B
& F. The observation was closed on 11 January 2018.
(c)
Stock of cement without impervious cover was
observed at Portion C. Impervious cover was provided at Portion C. The observation was closed on 11 January 2018.
11 January 2018
(a)
Used cement package without cover was
observed at Portion A. Cement package was removed at Portion A. The observation was closed on 18 January 2018.
(b)
Noise emission label was missing on hand-held
breaker was observed at Portion A. Valid NEL
was provided on the hand-held breaker at Portion A. The observation was closed on 18 January 2018.
(c)
Chemical container without drip tray were
observed at Portion A and Portion C. Chemical containers were removed at
Portion A and Portion C. The observation was closed
on 18 January 2018.
(d)
Fugitive dust was observed on haul road at
Portion C. Watering was arranged
immediately at Portion C. The
observation was closed on 18 January 2018.
18 January 2018
(a)
A
generator without NRMM label was observed at Portion A. Valid NRMM label was provided at Portion A. The observation was closed on 25 January 2018.
(b)
Discoloured
NRMM label was observed on an excavator at Portion A. Appropriate NRMM label was provided on the excavator at
Portion A. The observation was closed on 25 January 2018.
(c)
Stagnant
water was observed at Portion D. Stagnant
water was cleared at Portion D. The observation was closed
on 25 January 2018.
(d)
One
chemical container without drip tray was observed at Portion C. The chemical
container was removed at Portion C. The observation was closed
on 25 January 2018.
(e)
General
refuse discarded improperly was observed at Portion C. General refuse was
collected at Portion C. The observation was closed
on 25 January 2018.
25 January
2018
(a)
Improper
storage of C&D materials was observed at Portion F. Follow-actions for outstanding observation will be inspected during the
next site inspection.
(b)
Inappropriate
NRMM label was observed at Portion C. Follow-actions
for outstanding observation will be inspected during the next site inspection.
(c)
Tower
light generator with opened door was observed at Portion C. Follow-actions for outstanding observation will be inspected during the
next site inspection.
6.2.
Advice on the Solid and
Liquid Waste Management Status
6.2.1.
The Contractor registered as a chemical waste producer for the
Contract. Sufficient numbers of receptacles were available for general refuse
collection and sorting.
6.2.2.
There was no excavated marine sediment generated in this reporting period. Since the disposal of excavated marine sediments has been completed
with the last batch disposal on 30 August 2017 as confirmed by RSS, no excavated marine sediment was still remained and stored on site awaiting
disposal during this reporting period under Contract No. HY/2013/02.
6.2.3.
Total 18,737 m3
of inert C&D materials were reused by other contracts. The inert
C&D materials were delivered by land-based transportation
to Tailor Recycled Aggregates Limited, which
was a construction and demolition material recycler included in the recyclers¡¦
list of EPD. Tailor Recycled Aggregates Limited as an alternative disposal
ground was under approval by AECOM. Alternative ground internal trip ticket
system with the signatures from both sides¡¦ representative was implemented and
checked. The stamped CHIT was provided to AECOM for each delivery.
6.3.
Environmental Licenses
and Permits
6.3.1.
The valid environmental licenses and permits during the reporting period
are summarized in Appendix F.
6.4.
Implementation Status of Environmental Mitigation
Measures
6.4.1.
In response to the site audit findings, the Contractor carried out
corrective actions.
6.4.2.
The Contractor waters 8 times per day on all exposed soil within the
project site and associated works areas when construction activities are being
undertaken.
6.4.3.
The
Contractor was reminded to resolve the potential conflicts
between the proposed landscape measures and any other works of the project. The landscape works with mitigation code G1, G2
and G4 were mainly conducted in Portion D under construction stage. The other mitigation measures with mitigation code G5, G6, G7
& G9 were not yet started. The implementation status of Landscape and
Visual Mitigation Measures is presented in Appendix G.
6.4.4.
The Contractor was reminded to provide
well-maintained plant operated on-site and plant served regularly;
6.4.5.
The Contractor was reminded to switch
off vehicles and equipment while not in use;
6.4.6.
The Contractor was reminded to
schedule the construction works to minimize noise nuisance etc.
6.4.7.
A summary of the implementation Schedule of Environmental Mitigation
Measures (EMIS) is presented in Appendix G. Most of the necessary
mitigation measures were implemented properly.
6.5.
Summary of Exceedance of
the Environmental Quality Performance Limit
6.5.1.
Summary of Action and
Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS6 shall be
referred to the monthly EM&A report prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03.
6.5.2.
There was no
Action and Limit Level
exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP
level recorded at station AMS7 by the Environmental Team of Contract
No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
6.5.3.
There were
two Action Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP level recorded at station AMS2 and
AMS3B by the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period. The Investigation Reports No. 025 (including the causes of exceedance, action taken and recommendation for
mitigation) for Action or Limit Level Non-compliance were provided in Appendix
J.
6.5.4.
There was no
Action and Limit Level
exceedance for noise recorded
at station NMS2 and station NMS3B by the Environmental Team of Contract No.
HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
6.5.5.
The monitoring
results for the monitoring stations showed in Table 4.1 are reported in
the monthly EM&A Report prepared for Contract No. HY/2013/01. During
January 2018, there was one action
level exceedance of suspended solids recorded on
31 January 2018.
6.5.6. Since the removal of
temporary loading and unloading point by Contract No. HY/2013/02, which
involved marine work, was completed on 10 September 2017 and the area was
handed back to Reclamation Contractor with Contract No. HY/2010/02 on
11 September 2017 for subsequent seawall construction as confirmed by RSS, there was no marine works or
barge of this Contract worked at HKBCF reclamation site near the sea area or
area near the monitoring station under Contract No.
HY/2013/02 during January
2018. Hence,
specific investigation shall be referred to other ET¡¦s report(s) under the HZMB
Projects in which the respective contract(s) with remaining marine works
on-going for the exceedances recorded in water quality monitoring during this
reporting month. There was no Action and Limit Level exceedance recorded
on other monitoring date at the monitoring stations showed at Table 4.1 by
the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
6.5.7. Impact dolphin monitoring results at all transects are reported in the EM&A Reports
prepared for Contract No. HY/2013/01.
6.6.
Summary of Complaints,
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution
6.6.1.
Follow-up action to the complaint received by Highways Department on 29 December 2017 and referred to the ENPO on 08 January 2018. Then
the ENPO forwarded the complaint by email to the R.E. (AECOM), the Contractor
(China Harbour) and the ET (ETS-Testconsult Ltd.) of Contract No. HY/2013/02 at
12:20 on 08 January 2018. After
received the details of the complaint from the ENPO, the Environmental
Officers, RE and ET of Contract No. HY/2013/02 have performed a related
follow-up inspection on 10 January 2018
to investigate this event. After
received the details of the complaint from the ENPO, the Environmental
Officers, RE and ET of Contract No. HY/2013/02 have performed a related
follow-up inspection on 10 January 2018 to investigate this event. The inspection was concentrated
to check if any mud/slurry and dusts produced from the construction sites of Contract No. HY/2013/02 originated to East Coast Road and if any mud/slurry and dusts accumulated on the road side of East Coast Road. After checked with the RE and the Contractor of
Contract No. HY/2013/02 during 10:00 to 11:00 on 10
January 2018, the site entrance was cleaned and no mud/slurry
was observed around the East Coast Road site entrance. Besides, high
pressure water jet was provided at site exit in
order to prevent any mud/slurry bringing out
from the site (see attached
photo). The
site entrance situation was acceptable according to the site
inspection on 10 January 2018. In addition,
mitigation measures under the item A2 and W2 of EMIS were implemented including
provide vehicle washing facilities with high pressure water jet, the
road section between the washing facilities and the exit point was hard paved
and reminders were provided at the wheel washing basin and exit to remind all
Contract(s) vehicles using the site exit for
proper wheel washing etc.
To monitor the implementation of mitigation
measures, follow-up site inspections were performed. Mitigation measures under
the item A2 and W2 of EMIS were implemented and enhanced in order to further
improve the condition of the site entrance and road section between wheel-washing
facilities and East Coast
Road gate. Manpower was provided to stop the vehicles
when passing the washing facilities in order to lengthen the washing time.
Besides, washing
facilities with high pressure water jet at the area where vehicle washing takes
place was provided. The road section between the washing
facilities and the exit point was hard paved and watering truck was
arranged regularly to clean the road section. Besides washing the haul roads by watering, manpower was also assigned
to remove the accumulated mud/slurry along the haul road section between wheel-washing facilities and East Coast Road gate (see attached photo) to clean-up the haul road thoroughly in order to avoid
mud/slurry from escaping beyond the East Coast Road gate. The photos taken during the follow-up
inspections and the wheel washing facilities layout
plan were attached. The condition of site exit and the road section from
wheel-washing facilities to East Coast Road gate was found to be improved and the situation was acceptable. Hence, the
complaint was found non-related to Contract No. HY/2013/02. The complaint investigation report (Log No.
017) was provided in Appendix K.
6.6.2.
There were no
notifications of summons or prosecutions received during the reporting period.
6.6.3.
Statistics on environmental complaints,
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions are summarized in Appendix H.
7.1
Construction Programme
for the Coming Months
7.1.1 As informed by the Contractor, the
major construction activities for February 2018 are summarized:
l
Road and Bituminous works;
l
Landscaping work
7.2
Environmental Site
Inspection Schedule for the Coming Month
7.2.1 The tentative schedule for weekly site
inspections for February 2018 is provided in Appendix I.
8.1
Conclusions
8.1.1 The site preparation work of the Contract was
started on 25 July 2014 and the construction works of the Contract commenced on
24 November 2014.
8.1.2 Summary of Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr
TSP level at AMS6 shall be referred to the monthly EM&A report prepared by
Contract No. HY/2011/03.
8.1.3 There was no Action and Limit Level exceedance
of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level
recorded at station AMS7 by the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
8.1.4 There were two Action Level exceedance of 24-hr TSP
level recorded at station AMS2 and AMS3B by the
Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period. The Investigation Reports No. 025 (including the
causes of exceedance, action taken and recommendation for mitigation) for
Action or Limit Level Non-compliance were provided in Appendix J.
8.1.5 There was no Action and Limit Level exceedance for noise recorded at station NMS2 and station NMS3B by the
Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
8.1.6 The monitoring results for the monitoring stations showed in Table
4.1 are reported in the monthly EM&A Report prepared for Contract No. HY/2013/01. During January 2018, there was one action
level exceedance of suspended solid recorded on 31 January 2018.
8.1.7
Since the removal of temporary loading and unloading point by
Contract No. HY/2013/02, which involved marine work, was completed on 10
September 2017 and the area was handed back to Reclamation Contractor with
Contract No. HY/2010/02 on 11 September 2017 for subsequent seawall
construction as confirmed by RSS, there was no
marine works or barge of this Contract worked at HKBCF reclamation site near
the sea area or area near the monitoring station under Contract No. HY/2013/02 during January 2018. Hence, specific investigation shall be
referred to other ET¡¦s report(s) under the HZMB Projects in which the
respective contract(s) with remaining marine works on-going for the exceedances
recorded in water quality monitoring during this reporting month. There was no Action and Limit Level exceedance recorded on other
monitoring date at the monitoring stations showed at Table 4.1 by the
Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2013/01 during the reporting period.
8.1.8 Impact dolphin monitoring results at all transects are reported in the EM&A Reports
prepared for Contract No. HY/2013/01.
8.1.9 Follow-up action to the
complaint received by Highways Department on 29 December 2017 and referred to the ENPO on 08 January 2018. Then
the ENPO forwarded the complaint by email to the R.E. (AECOM), the Contractor
(China Harbour) and the ET (ETS-Testconsult Ltd.) of Contract No. HY/2013/02 at
12:20 on 08 January 2018. After
received the details of the complaint from the ENPO, the Environmental
Officers, RE and ET of Contract No. HY/2013/02 have performed a related
follow-up inspection on 10 January 2018
to investigate this event. After
received the details of the complaint from the ENPO, the Environmental
Officers, RE and ET of Contract No. HY/2013/02 have performed a related
follow-up inspection on 10 January 2018 to investigate this event. The inspection was concentrated
to check if any mud/slurry and dusts produced from the construction sites of Contract No. HY/2013/02 originated to East Coast Road and if any mud/slurry and dusts accumulated on the road side of East Coast Road. After checked with the RE and the Contractor of
Contract No. HY/2013/02 during 10:00 to 11:00 on 10
January 2018, the site entrance was cleaned and no mud/slurry
was observed around the East Coast Road site entrance. Besides, high
pressure water jet was provided at site exit in
order to prevent any mud/slurry bringing out
from the site (see attached
photo). The
site entrance situation was acceptable according to the site
inspection on 10 January 2018. In addition,
mitigation measures under the item A2 and W2 of EMIS were implemented including
provide vehicle washing facilities with high pressure water jet, the
road section between the washing facilities and the exit point was hard paved
and reminders were provided at the wheel washing basin and exit to remind all
Contract(s) vehicles using the site exit for
proper wheel washing etc.
To monitor the implementation of mitigation
measures, follow-up site inspections were performed. Mitigation measures under
the item A2 and W2 of EMIS were implemented and enhanced in order to further
improve the condition of the site entrance and road section between wheel-washing
facilities and East Coast
Road gate. Manpower was provided to stop the vehicles
when passing the washing facilities in order to lengthen the washing time.
Besides, washing
facilities with high pressure water jet at the area where vehicle washing takes
place was provided. The road section between the washing facilities
and the exit point was hard paved and watering truck was arranged regularly
to clean the road section. Besides
washing the haul roads by watering, manpower was also assigned to remove the
accumulated mud/slurry along the haul road section between wheel-washing facilities and East Coast Road gate (see attached photo) to clean-up the haul road thoroughly in order to avoid
mud/slurry from escaping beyond the East Coast Road gate. The photos taken during the follow-up
inspections and the wheel washing facilities layout
plan were attached. The condition of site exit and the road section from
wheel-washing facilities to East Coast Road gate was found to be improved and the situation was acceptable. Hence, the
complaint was found non-related to Contract No. HY/2013/02. The complaint investigation report (Log No.
017) was provided in Appendix K.
8.1.10 There were no
notifications of summons or prosecutions received during the reporting period.
- END OF REPORT -
Figure
1 Air Quality and Noise Monitoring Stations
for HKBCF
Figure
2 Water Quality Monitoring Stations
(construction phases)
Figure 3 |
Dolphin Monitoring
Transect Line and Layout Map |
Appendix
A
Location of Works Areas
Appendix B
Project Organization for Environmental Works
Appendix
C
Construction Programme
Appendix
D
Event and Action Plan
Event and Action Plan for Water Quality
Event |
ET Leader |
IEC |
ER |
Contractor |
Action
level being exceeded by one sampling day |
1.
Repeat in situ measurement on next day of exceedance to confirm
findings 2.
Identify source(s) of impact 3.
Inform IEC, contractor and ER 4.
Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working
methods |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of noncompliance in writing 2.
Notify Contractor |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of noncompliance in writing 2.
Notify Contractor |
1.
Inform the ER and confirm notification of the noncompliance in writing 2.
Rectify unacceptable practice 3.
Amend working methods if appropriate. |
Action
level being exceeded by two or more consecutive sampling days |
1.
Repeat in situ measurement to confirm findings 2.
Identify source(s) of impact 3.
Inform IEC, Contractor and ER 4.
Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working
methods 5.
Discuss mitigation measures with IEC, ER and Contractor 6.
Ensure mitigation measures are implemented 7.
Increase the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of
Action level; 8.
Repeat measurement on next day of exceedance to confirm findings. |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor¡¦s working method 2.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions 3.
Review the proposed mitigation measures submitted by Contractor and
advise the ER accordingly 4.
Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of noncompliance in writing 2.
Discuss with IEC on the proposed mitigation measures 3.
Make agreement on mitigation measures to be implemented 4.
Ensure mitigation measures are properly implemented 5.
Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures |
1.
Inform the Engineer and confirm notification of the noncompliance in
writing; 2.
Rectify unacceptable practice 3.
Check all plant and equipment and consider changes of working methods 4.
Discuss with ET and IEC on possible remedial actions and propose
mitigation measures to IEC and ER within 3 working days of notification 5.
Implement the agreed mitigation measures 6.
Amend working methods if appropriate |
Limit level being
exceeded by one sampling day |
1.
Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm findings 2.
Identify source(s) of impact 3.
Inform IEC, Contractor, ER and EPD 4.
Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working
methods 5.
Discuss mitigation measures with IEC, ER and Contractor 6.
Ensure mitigation measures are implemented 7.
Increase the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of
Limit level |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted by ET and Contractor¡¦s working method 2.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions 3.
Review the proposed mitigation measures submitted by Contractor and
advise the ER accordingly 4.
Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing 2.
Discuss with IEC, ET and Contractor on the proposed mitigation
measures 3.
Request Contractor to critically review the working methods 4.
Ensure mitigation measures are properly implemented 5.
Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures |
1.
Inform the ER and confirm notification of the noncompliance in writing 2.
Rectify unacceptable practice 3.
Check all plant and equipment and consider changes of working methods 4.
Submit proposal of mitigation measures to ER within 3 working days of
notification and discuss with ET, IEC and ER 5.
Implement the agreed mitigation measures 6.
Amend working methods if appropriate |
Limit level being
exceeded by two or more consecutive sampling days |
1.
Repeat in-situ measurement to confirm findings 2.
Identify source(s) of impact 3.
Inform IEC, contractor, ER and EPD 4.
Check monitoring data, all plant, equipment and Contractor's working
methods 5.
Discuss mitigation measures with IEC, ER and Contractor 6.
Ensure mitigation measures are implemented 7.
Increase the monitoring frequency to daily until no exceedance of
Limit level for two consecutive days |
1.
Check monitoring data submitted
by ET and Contractor¡¦s working method 2.
Discuss with ET and Contractor on possible remedial actions 3.
Review the Contractor¡¦s mitigation measures whenever necessary to
assure their effectiveness and advise the ER accordingly. |
1.
Confirm receipt of notification of failure in writing 2.
Discuss with IEC, ET and Contractor on the proposed mitigation
measures 3.
Request Contractor to critically review the working methods 4.
Make agreement on the mitigation measures to be implemented 5.
Ensure mitigation measures are properly implemented 6.
Assess the effectiveness of the implemented mitigation measures 7.
Consider and instruct, if necessary, the Contractor to slow down or to
stop all or part of the construction activities until no exceedance of Limit
level. |
1.
Inform the ER and confirm notification of the noncompliance in writing 2.
Take immediate action to avoid further exceedance 3.
Rectify unacceptable practice 4.
Check all plant and equipment and consider changes of working methods 5.
Submit proposal of mitigation measures to ER within 3 working days of
notification and discuss with ET, IEC and ER 6.
Implement the agreed mitigation measures 7.
Resubmit proposals of mitigation measures if problem still not under
control; 8.
As directed by the engineer, to slow down or to stop all or part of
the construction activities until no exceedance of Limit level. |
Appendix E
Waste Flow Table
Appendix F
Environmental Licenses and Permits
Environmental
Licenses and Permits |
||||||
Item No. |
Type of Permit / Licence |
Reference No. |
Application Date |
Date of Issue |
Date of Expiry |
Remark |
1 |
Environmental Permit under EIAO |
EP-353/2009/K |
24 Mar 2016 |
11 Apr 2016 |
NA |
Issued |
2 |
Construction Dust Notification (Western Portion) |
Acknowledge Receipt: 377883 |
5 Aug 2014 |
11 Aug 2014 |
NA |
Notified |
3 |
Construction Dust Notification (Works Area WA3) |
Acknowledge Receipt: 377884 |
5 Aug 2014 |
18 Aug 2014 |
NA |
Notified |
4 |
Construction Waste Disposal Account |
Billing Account No.: 7020516 |
5 Aug 2014 |
15 Aug 2014 |
NA |
Account approved |
5 |
Registration as a Chemical Waste Producer (Works Area
WA3) |
Waste Producer Number (WPN): 5213-961-C1186-23 |
1 Sep 2014 |
17 Oct 2014 |
NA |
Registration completed |
6 |
Discharge License under WPCO (Works Area WA3) |
License No.: WT00020194-2014 |
21 Aug 2014 |
27 Oct 2014 |
31 Oct 2019 |
License approved |
7 |
Registration as a Chemical Waste Producer (Western
Portion) |
Waste Producer Number (WPN): 5213-961-C1186-27 |
20 Oct 2014 |
24 Nov 2014 |
NA |
Registration completed |
8 |
Discharge License under WPCO (Western Portion) |
License No.: WT00020597-2014 |
25 Sep 2014 |
16 Mar 2015 |
31 Mar 2020 |
License approved |
9 |
Construction Noise Permit under NCO for HKBCF(Western
Portion) |
License No.: GW-RS1082-17 |
22 Nov 2017 |
6 Dec 2017 |
11 Apr 2018 |
Permit Approved |
Appendix G
Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation Measures (EMIS)
Environmental
Mitigation Implementation Schedule ¡V Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities
(Superstructures and Infrastructures)
EIA Ref. |
EM&A Log Ref |
Environmental Mitigation Measures |
Objectives of the
Recommended Measures & Main Concerns to address |
Who to implement the
measures? |
Location |
When to implement the
measures? |
What requirements or standards for the measure to achieve? |
Implementation Status |
Air Quality |
||||||||
S HKBCFEIA |
A1 |
The
contractor shall follow the procedures and requirements given in the Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
Good
construction site practices to control the dust impact at the nearby
sensitive receivers to within the relevant criteria |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
To
control the dust impact to within the HKAQO and TM-EIA criteria(Ref. 1-hr and
24 hr TSP levels are 500µgm-3 and
260µgm-3, respectively) |
V |
S HKBCFEIA and S TKCLKLEIA |
A2 |
Proper
watering of exposed spoil should be undertaken throughout the construction
phase: - Any
excavated or stockpile of dusty material should be covered entirely by
impervious sheeting or sprayed with water to maintain the entire surface wet
and then removed or backfilled or reinstated where practicable within 24
hours of the excavation or unloading; - Any dusty
materials remaining after a stockpile is removed should be wetted with water
and cleared from the surface of roads; - A
stockpile of dusty material should not be extended
beyond the pedestrian barriers, fencing or traffic cones. - Where
practicable, vehicle washing facilities with high pressure water jet should
be provided at every discernible or designated vehicle exit point. The area
where vehicle washing takes place and the road section between the washing
facilities and the exit point should be paved with concrete, bituminous
materials or hardcores; - When
there are open excavation and reinstatement works, hoarding of not less than - The
portion of any road leading only to construction site that is within - Surfaces
where any pneumatic or power-driven drilling, cutting, polishing or other
mechanical breaking operation takes place should be sprayed with water or a
dust suppression chemical continuously; - Any area
that involves demolition activities should be sprayed with water or a dust
suppression chemical immediately prior to, during and immediately after the
activities so as to maintain the entire surface wet; - Where a
scaffolding is erected around the perimeter of a building under construction,
effective dust screens, sheeting or netting should be provided to enclose the
scaffolding from the ground floor level of the building, or a canopy should
be provided from the first floor level up to the highest level of the
scaffolding; - Any skip
hoist for material transport should be totally enclosed by impervious
sheeting; - Every
stock of more than 20 bags of cement or dry pulverised fuel ash (PFA) should
be covered entirely by impervious sheeting or placed in an area sheltered on
the top and the 3 sides; - Cement or
dry PFA delivered in bulk should be stored in a closed silo fitted with an
audible high level alarm which is interlocked with the material filling line
and no overfilling is allowed; - Loading,
unloading, transfer, handling or storage of bulk cement or dry PFA should be
carried out in a totally enclosed system or facility, and any vent or exhaust
should be fitted with an effective fabric filter or equivalent air pollution control
system; and - Exposed
earth should be properly treated by compaction, turfing, hydroseeding,
vegetation planting or sealing with latex, vinyl, bitumen, shotcrete or other
suitable surface stabiliser within six months after the last construction
activity on the construction site or part of the construction site where the
exposed earth lies. |
Good
construction site practices to control the dust impact at the nearby
sensitive receivers to within the relevant criteria |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
To
control the dust impact to within the HKAQO and TM-EIA criteria(Ref. 1-hr and
24 hr TSP levels are 500µgm-3 and
260µgm-3, respectively) |
V |
S HKBCFEIA and S TKCLKLEIA |
A3 |
The
Contractor should undertake proper watering on all exposed spoil and
associated work areas (with at least 8 times per day) throughout the
construction phase. |
Control
construction dust |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction
stage |
To
control the dust impact |
V |
S HKBCFEIA |
A4 |
Engineer
to incorporate the controlled measures into the Particular Specification (PS)
for the civil work. The PS should also draw the contractor¡¦s attention to
relevant latest Practice notes issued by EPD. |
Control
construction dust |
Engineer |
All construction
sites |
Design Stage |
Air
pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
V |
S HKBCFEIA and S4.11 of TKCLKLEIA |
A5 |
Implement
regular dust monitoring under EM&A programme during the construction
stage. |
Monitor
the 24hr and 1hr TSP levels at the representative dust monitoring stations to
ensure compliance with relevant criteria throughout the construction period. |
Contractor of Contract No. HY/2013/01 and Contractor
of Contract No. HY/2011/03 |
Selected representative dust
monitoring station |
Construction stage |
- Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation - To
control the dust impact to within the HKAQO and TM-EIA criteria(Ref. 1-hr and
24 hr TSP levels are 500µgm-3 and
260µgm-3, respectively) |
V |
S HKBCFEIA |
A6 |
The
following mitigation measures should be adopted to prevent fugitive dust
emissions for concrete batching plant: Loading, unloading, handling, transfer or
storage of any dusty materials should be carried out in totally enclosed
system; All dust-laden air or waste gas generated
by the process operations should be properly extracted and vented to fabric
filtering system to meet the emission limits for TSP; Vents for all silos and cement/ pulverised
fuel ash (PFA) weighing scale should be fitted with fabric filtering system; The
materials which may generate airborne dusty emissions should be wetted by
water spray system; All
receiving hoppers should be enclosed on three sides up to All
conveyor transfer points should be totally enclosed; All
access and route roads within the premises should be paved and wetted; and Vehicle
cleaning facilities should be provided and used by all concrete trucks before
leaving the premises to wash off any dust on the wheels and/or body. |
Monitor
the 24hr and 1hr TSP levels at the representative dust monitoring stations to
ensure compliance with relevant criteria throughout the construction period. |
Contractor |
Selected representative dust monitoring station |
Construction stage |
Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation - To
control the dust impact to within the HKAQO and TM-EIA criteria(Ref. 1-hr and 24 hr TSP levels are
500µgm-3 and 260µgm-3,
respectively) |
N/A |
S HKBCFEIA |
A7 |
The
following mitigation measures should be adopted to prevent fugitive dust
emissions at barging point: All road surface within the barging
facilities will be paved; Dust enclosures will
be provided for the loading ramp; Vehicles will be required to pass through
designated wheels wash facilities; and Continuous water
spray at the loading points. |
Control
construction dust |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
Air
Pollution Control (Construction Dust) Regulation |
N/A (Construction in
process) |
Construction Noise (Air
borne) |
||||||||
S |
N1 |
Use of good site
practices to limit noise emissions by considering the following: -
only well-maintained plant should be
operated on-site and plant should be serviced regularly during the
construction programme; -
machines and plant (such as trucks, cranes)
that may be in intermittent use should be shut down between work periods or
should be throttled down to a minimum; -
plant known to emit noise strongly in one
direction, where possible, be orientated so that the noise is directed away
from nearby NSRs; -
silencers or mufflers on construction
equipment should be properly fitted and maintained during the construction
works; -
mobile plant should be sited as far away
from NSRs as possible and practicable; -
material stockpiles, mobile container site
officer and other structures should be effectively utilised, where practicable,
to screen noise from on-site construction activities. |
Control
construction airborne noise by means of good site
practices |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
Noise
Control Ordinance |
V |
S HKBCFEIA |
N2 |
Install
temporary hoarding located on the site boundaries between noisy construction
activities and NSRs. The conditions of the hoardings shall be properly
maintained throughout the construction period. |
Reduce
the construction noise levels at low-level zone of NSRs through partial
screening |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
-
Noise Control Ordinance -
Annex 5, TM_EIA |
V |
S HKBCFEIA |
N3 |
Install
movable noise barriers (typically density 14kg/m2),
acoustic mat or full enclosure close to noisy plants including air
compressor, generators, saw. |
Screen
the noisy plant items to be used at all construction sites |
Contractor |
For plant items
listed in Appendix 6D of the EIA report at all
construction sites |
Construction stage |
- Noise
Control Ordinance - Annex 5,
TM_EIA - 75dB(A)
for residential premises - The
movable barrier should achieve at least 5 dB(A) and the full enclosure should
be designed to achieve 10dB(A) |
N/A |
S HKBCFEIA |
N4 |
Select
¡§Quiet plants¡¨ which comply with the BS 5228 Part 1 or TM standards. |
Reduce
the noise levels of plant items |
Contractor |
For plant items
listed In Appendix 6D of the EIA report at all
construction sites |
Construction stage |
-
Noise Control Ordinance -
Annex 5, TM_EIA |
V |
S HKBCFEIA |
N5 |
Sequencing
operation of construction plants where practicable. |
Operate
sequentially within the same work site to reduce the construction airborne
noise |
Contractor |
All construction
sites where practicable |
Construction stage |
- Noise
Control Ordinance - Annex 5,
TM_EIA |
V |
S5.1 of TMCLKLEIA |
N6 |
Implement
a noise monitoring under EM&A programme. |
Monitor
the construction noise levels at selected representative locations |
Contractor of Contract No. HY/2013/01 |
Selected representative noise
monitoring station |
Construction stage |
- Noise
Control Ordinance - Annex 5,
TM_EIA - 75dB(A)
for residential premises |
V |
Sediment |
||||||||
|
S1 |
All dredged marine mud, which required Type 2
Confined Marine Disposal under Environment, Transport and Works Bureau
Technical Circular (Works) No. 34/2002 Management of Dredged/Excavated
Sediment, from the Project shall be disposed of inside the sheet pile
cellular structures within the Project boundary. |
Re-deposition of Contaminated Sediment |
Contractor |
Dredged Contaminated Sediment |
Construction stage |
-
Waste Disposal Ordinance -
ETWB TC 34/2002 |
V |
|
S2 |
Before re-deposition the
contaminated sediment, a layer of geotextile shall be placed at the bottom of
the sheet pile cellular structures to avoid direct contact of the
contaminated sediment and the bottom sediment. |
Re-deposition of Contaminated Sediment |
Contractor |
Dredged Contaminated Sediment |
Construction stage |
-
Waste Disposal Ordinance -
ETWB TC 34/2002 |
V |
|
S3 |
A minimum of |
Re-deposition of Contaminated Sediment |
Contractor |
Dredged
Contaminated Sediment |
Construction stage |
-
Waste Disposal Ordinance -
ETWB TC 34/2002 |
V |
|
S4 |
The contaminated sediment
shall not be disturbed after re-deposition. No piling works or deep
foundation which may disturb the contaminated sediment is allowed within the
cellular structures. |
Re-deposition of Contaminated Sediment |
Contractor |
Dredged
Contaminated Sediment |
Construction stage |
-
Waste Disposal Ordinance -
ETWB TC 34/2002 |
V |
Waste management (Construction Waste) |
||||||||
S12.6 of TMCLKLEIA |
WM1 |
The Contractor shall
identify a coordinator for the management of waste. |
Proper implementation of
WMP |
Contractor |
Contractor All construction sites |
Construction stage |
|
V |
S12.6 of TMCLKLEIA |
WM2 |
The Contractor shall
apply for and obtain the appropriate licenses for the disposal of public
fill, chemical waste and effluent discharges. |
Proper control of wastes
disposal in accordance to relevant ordinances |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
Construction Stage |
-
Land (Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap28); -
Waste Disposal Ordinance (Cap 354); -
Dumping at Sea Ordinance (Cap 466); -
Water Pollution Control Ordinance. |
V |
S12.6 of TMCLKLEIA |
WM3 |
EM&A of waste
handling, storage, transportation, disposal procedures and documentation
through the site audit programme shall be undertaken. |
Ensure proper
implementation mitigation measures stated in WMP |
Contractor |
All construction sites |
|
Construction stage |
V |
S HKBCFEIA and S12.6 of TMCLKLEIA |
WM4 |
Construction and Demolition Material The following mitigation measures should be
implemented in handling the waste: -
Maintain temporary stockpiles and reuse
excavated fill material for backfilling and reinstatement; -
Carry out on-site sorting; -
Make provisions in the Contract documents
to allow and promote the use of recycled aggregates where appropriate; -
Adopt ¡¥Selective Demolition¡¦ technique to
demolish the existing structures and facilities with a view to recovering
broken concrete effectively for recycling purpose, where possible; -
Implement a trip-ticket system for each
works contract to ensure that the disposal of C&D materials are properly
documented and verified; -
Implement an enhanced Waste Management Plan
similar to ETWBTC (Works) No. 19/2005 ¡V ¡§Environmental Management on
Construction Sites¡¨ to encourage on-site sorting of C&D materials and to
minimize their generation during the course of construction; -
In addition, disposal of the C&D
materials onto any sensitive locations such as agricultural lands, etc.
should be avoided. The Contractor shall propose the final disposal sites to
the Project Proponent and get its approval before implementation; -
The surplus surcharge should be transferred to a fill bank. |
Good site
practice to minimize and recycle the C&D material as far as practicable
so as to reduce the amount for final disposal |
Contractor |
All construction
site areas |
Construction stage |
-
Land (Miscellaneous Provisions)
Ordinance -
Waste Disposal Ordinance -
ETWB TC 19/2005 |
V |
S S HKBCFEIA and S12.6 of TMCLKLEIA |
WM5 |
C&D Waste -
Standard formwork or pre-fabrication should
be used as far as practicable in order to minimise the arising of C&D
materials. The use of more durable formwork or plastic facing for the
construction works should be considered. Use of wooden hoardings should not
be used, as in other projects. -
Metal hoarding and falsework should be used
to enhance the possibility of recycling. The purchasing of construction
materials will be carefully planned in order to avoid over ordering and
wastage. -
The Contractor should recycle as much of
the C&D materials as possible on-site. Public fill and C&D waste
should be segregated and stored in different containers or skips to enhance
reuse or recycling of materials and their proper disposal. Where practicable,
concrete and masonry can be crushed and used as fill. Steel reinforcement bar
can be used by scrap steel mills. Different areas of the sites should be
considered for such segregation and storage. |
Good site
practice to minimize and recycle the C&D material as far as practicable
so as to reduce the amount for final disposal |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
- Land
(Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance - Waste
Disposal Ordinance - ETWB TC
19/2005 |
V |
S S HKBCFEIA and S12.6 of TMCLKLEIA |
WM6 |
Chemical Waste -
Chemical waste that is produced, as defined
by Schedule 1 of the Waste Disposal (Chemical Waste) (General) Regulation,
should be handled in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging,
Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes. -
Containers used for the storage of chemical
wastes should be suitable for the substance they are holding, resistant to
corrosion, maintained in a good condition, and securely closed; have a
capacity of less than 450 litres unless the specification has been approved
by the EPD; and display a label in English and Chinese in accordance with
instructions prescribed in Schedule 2 of the regulation. -
The storage area for chemical wastes should
be clearly labelled and used solely for the storage of chemical waste;
enclosed on at least 3 sides; have an impermeable floor and bunding of
sufficient capacity to accommodate 110% of the volume of the largest
container or 20 % of the total volume of waste stored in that area, whichever
is the greatest; have adequate ventilation; covered to prevent rainfall
entering; and arranged so that incompatible materials are adequately
separated. -
Disposal of chemical waste should be via a
licensed waste collector; be to a facility licensed to receive chemical
waste, such as the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre which also offers a
chemical waste collection service and can supply the necessary storage
containers; or be to a reuser of the waste, under approval from the EPD. |
Control
the chemical waste and ensure proper storage, handling and disposal. |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
- Waste Disposal(Chemical
Waste) General Regulation - Code of
Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical Waste |
V |
S HKBCFEIA and S12.6 of TMCLKLEIA |
WM7 |
Sewage Adequate numbers of portable toilets should
be provided for the workers. The portable toilets should be maintained in a
state, which will not deter the workers from utilizing these portable
toilets. Night soil should be collected by licensed collectors regularly. |
Proper
handling of sewage from worker to avoid odour, pest and litter impacts. |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
Waste
Disposal Ordinance |
V |
S HKBCFEIA and S12.6 of TMCLKLEIA |
WM8 |
General Refuse -
The site and surroundings shall be kept
tidy and litter free. General refuse generated on-site should be stored in
enclosed bins or compaction units separately from construction and chemical
wastes. -
A reputable waste collector should be
employed by the Contractor to remove general refuse from the site, separately
from construction and chemical wastes, on a daily basis to minimize odour,
pest and litter impacts. Burning of refuse on construction sites is
prohibited by law. -
Aluminium cans are often recovered from the
waste stream by individual collectors if they are segregated and made easily
accessible. Separate labelled bins for their deposit should be provided if
feasible. -
Office wastes can be reduced through the
recycling of paper if volumes are large enough to warrant collection.
Participation in a local collection scheme should be considered by the
Contractor. In addition, waste separation facilities for paper, aluminium cans, plastic bottles etc., should be
provided. -
Training should be provided to workers about
the concepts of site cleanliness and appropriate waste management procedure,
including reduction, reuse and recycling of wastes. -
Sufficient dustbins shall be provided for storage of waste as required
under the Public Cleansing and Prevention of Nuisances By-laws. In addition,
general refuse shall be cleared daily and shall be disposed of to the nearest
licensed landfill or refuse transfer station. -
All waste containers shall be in a secure area on hardstanding. |
Minimize
production of the general refuse and avoid odour, pest and litter impacts. |
Contractor |
All construction
sites |
Construction stage |
Waste
Disposal Ordinance |
V |
Water Quality (Construction Phase) |
||||||||
|
W1 |
Mitigation during the
marine works to reduce impacts to within acceptable levels have been
recommended and will comprise a series of measures that restrict the method
and sequencing of dredging/backfilling, as well as protection measures.
Details of the measures are provided below: -
No dredging works of marine sediment shall be carried out the Project
except for the construction of box culverts and seawalls at Portion D. -
Reclamation filling for the Project shall not proceed until at least -
Except for the filling of the cellular structures, not more than 15% public
fill shall be used for reclamation filling below +2.5mPD during construction
of the seawall; -
After the seawall is completed except for the -
No more than 2 grab dredgers with a maximum daily dredging rate of -
Upon completion of -
Upon completion of the whole section of seawall except for the -
Closed grabs should be used for sediment dredging to reduce sediment
loss when lifting the grabs to the barges. Only grab dredgers shall be used
for dredging works of the Project; -
All mechanical grabs shall be designed and maintained to avoid spillage; -
The moving speed of construction vessels in the dredging area should
be reduced to prevent disturbance to the seabed generating sediment plumes; -
Floating type silt curtains shall be installed enclosing the entire
reclamation site at all time. Staggered layers of silt curtain shall be
provided to prevent sediment loss at navigation accesses. The length of each
staggered layers shall be at least -
The cage-type silt-curtain with steel enclosure is proposed to be
installed to enclose local pollution caused by the grab dredging. The grab
dredging work should be carried out within the cage-type silt curtain; -
Single layer silt curtain to be applied around the North-east airport water
intake; -
The silt-curtains should be maintained in good condition to ensure the
sediment plume generated from dredging and filling be confined effectively
within the site boundary; -
The dredging and filling works shall be scheduled to spread the works
evenly over a working day; -
Cellular structure shall be used for seawall construction; -
A layer of geotextile shall be placed on top of the seabed before any
filling activities take place inside the cellular structures to form the
seawall; -
The conveyor belts shall be fitted with windboards and conveyor release
points shall be covered with curtain to prevent any spillage of filling
materials onto the surrounding waters; -
An additional layer of slit curtain shall be installed near the active
stone column installation points. A layer of geotextile with stone blanket on
top shall be placed on the seabed prior to stone column installation works.
Stone blanket -> with silt curtain. |
To control construction
water quality |
Contractor of Contract No. HY/2013/01 |
During dredging and filling |
Construction stage |
TM-EIAO |
V |
S9.11.1 - S9.11.1.2 of HKBCFEIA and S6.10 of
TMCLKLEIAƒn |
W1 |
- In addition, dredging
operations should be undertaken in such a manner as to minimize resuspension
of sediments. Standard good dredging practice measures should, therefore, be
implemented including the following requirements which should be written into
the dredging and filling contract. 1.
Trailer suction hopper dredgers shall not allow mud to overflow; 2.
Use of Lean Material Overboard (LMOB) systems shall be prohibited; 3.
Mechanical grabs shall be designed and maintained to avoid spillage
and should seal tightly while being lifted; 4.
Barges and hopper dredgers shall have tight fitting seals to their bottom
openings to prevent leakage of material; 5.
Any pipe leakages shall be repaired quickly. Plant should not be operated
with leaking pipes; 6.
Loading of barges and hoppers shall be controlled to prevent splashing
of dredged material to the surrounding water. Barges or hoppers shall not be
filled to a level which will cause overflow of materials or pollution of
water during loading or transportation; 7.
Excess material shall be cleaned from the decks and exposed fittings
of barges and hopper dredgers before the vessel is moved; 8.
Adequate freeboard shall be maintained on barges to reduce the likelihood
of decks being washed by wave action; 9.
All vessels shall be sized such that adequate clearance is maintained
between vessels and the sea bed at all states of the tide to ensure that
undue turbidity is not generated by turbulence from vessel movement or
propeller wash; 10.
The works shall not cause foam, oil, grease, litter or other objectionable
matter to be present in the water within and adjacent to the works site. |
To control construction water quality |
Contractor of Contract No. HY/2013/01 |
During dredging and filling |
Construction Stage |
-
TM-EIAO
-
Marine
Fill Committee Guidelines -
DASO
Permits Conditions |
V |
S9.11.1.3 of HKBCFEIA and S6.10 of TMCLKLEIA |
W2 |
Land Works General construction activities on land should also
be governed by standard good working practice. Specific measures to be
written into the works contracts should include: -
wastewater
from temporary site facilities should be controlled to prevent direct
discharge to surface or marine waters; -
sewage
effluent and discharges from on-site kitchen facilities shall be directed to
Government sewer in accordance with the requirements of the WPCO or collected
for disposal offsite. The use of soakaways shall be avoided; -
storm
drainage shall be directed to storm drains via adequately designed sand/silt
removal facilities such as sand traps, silt traps and sediment basins.
Channels, earth bunds or sand bag barriers should be provided on site to
properly direct stormwater to such silt removal facilities. Catchpits and
perimeter channels should be constructed in advance of site formation works
and earthworks; -
silt
removal facilities, channels and manholes shall be maintained and any
deposited silt and grit shall be removed regularly, including specifically at
the onset of and after each rainstorm; -
temporary
access roads should be surfaced with crushed stone or gravel; -
rainwater
pumped out from trenches or foundation excavations should be discharged into
storm drains via silt removal facilities; -
measures
should be taken to prevent the washout of construction materials, soil, silt
or debris into any drainage system; -
open
stockpiles of construction materials (e.g. aggregates and sand) on site
should be covered with tarpaulin or similar fabric during rainstorms; -
manholes
(including any newly constructed ones) should always be adequately covered
and temporarily sealed so as to prevent silt, construction materials or
debris from getting into the drainage system, and to prevent storm run-off
from getting into foul sewers; -
discharges
of surface run-off into foul sewers must always be prevented in order not to
unduly overload the foul sewerage system; -
all
vehicles and plant should be cleaned before they leave the construction site
to ensure that no earth, mud or debris is deposited by them on roads. A wheel
washing bay should be provided at every site exit; -
wheel
wash overflow shall be directed to silt removal facilities before being
discharged to the storm drain; -
the
section of construction road between the wheel washing bay and the public
road should be surfaced with crushed stone or coarse gravel; -
wastewater
generated from concreting, plastering, internal decoration, cleaning work and
other similar activities, shall be screened to remove large objects; -
vehicle
and plant servicing areas, vehicle wash bays and lubrication facilities shall
be located under roofed areas. The drainage in these covered areas shall be
connected to foul sewers via a petrol interceptor in accordance with the
requirements of the WPCO or collected for off site disposal; -
the
contractors shall prepare an oil / chemical cleanup plan and ensure that
leakages or spillages are contained and cleaned up immediately; -
waste
oil should be collected and stored for recycling or disposal, in accordance
with the Waste Disposal Ordinance; -
all
fuel tanks and chemical storage areas should be provided with locks and be
sited on sealed areas. The storage areas should be surrounded by bunds with a
capacity equal to 110% of the storage capacity of the largest tank; and -
surface
run-off from bunded areas should pass through oil/grease traps prior to
discharge to the stormwater system. |
To control construction water qualityƒn |
Contractor |
All land-based construction sites |
Construction stage |
TM-EIAO |
V |
S9.14 of HKBCFEIA and S6.10 of TMCLKLEIA |
W3 |
Implement a water quality monitoring programme |
Control water quality |
Contractor of Contract No. HY/2013/01 |
At identified monitoring location |
During Construction
stage |
-
TM-water
- Water Pollution Control Ordinance |
V |
Ecology
(construction Phase) |
||||||||
S10.7 of HKBCFEIA and S8.14 of TMCLKLE IA |
E1 |
-
Use closed grab in dredging works. -
Install silt curtain during the construction. -
Limit dredging and works fronts. -
Construct seawall prior to reclamation filling where practicable. -
Good site practices -
Strict enforcement of no marine dumping. -
Site runoff control -
Spill response plan |
Minimize marine water
quality impacts |
Contractor |
Seawall, reclamation area |
During construction |
TM-Water |
V |
S10.7 of HKBCFEIA |
E2 |
Watering to reduce
dust generation; prevention of siltation of freshwater habitats; Site runoff
should be desilted, to reduce the potential for suspended sediments, organics
and other contaminants to enter streams and standing freshwater. |
Prevent
Sedimentation from Land-based works areas |
Contractor |
Land-based works areas |
During construction |
TM-Water |
V |
S10.7 of HKBCFEIA and S8.14 of TMCLKLEIA |
E3 |
Good site
practices, including strictly following the permitted works hours, using
quieter machines where practicable, and avoiding excessive lightings during
night time. |
Prevent
disturbance to terrestrial fauna and habitats |
Contractor |
Land-based works areas |
During construction |
|
V |
S10.7 of HKBCFEIA and S8.14 of TMCLKLEIA |
E4 |
-
Dolphin Exclusion Zone -
Dolphin watching plan |
Minimize temporary marine
habitat loss impact to dolphins |
Contractor |
Marine works |
During marine works |
TM-EIAO |
V |
S10.7 of HKBCFEIA and S8.14 of TMCLKLEIA |
E5 |
-
Decouple compressors and other equipment on working vessels -
Proposal on design and implementation of acoustic decoupling -
measures applied during dredging and reclamation works -
Avoidance of percussive piling |
Minimize marine noise
impacts on dolphins |
Contractor |
Marine works |
During marine works |
-
TM-EIAO -
Marine Park Regulations |
|
S10.7 of HKBCFEIA and S8.14 of TMCLKLEIA |
E6 |
-
Control vessel speed -
Skipper training -
Predefined and regular routes for working
vessels; avoid |
Minimize marine traffic disturbance on dolphins |
Contractor |
Marine traffic |
During marine works |
|
V |
S10.10 of HKBCFEIA and S8.14 of TMCLKLEIA |
E7 |
Vessel based dolphin
monitoring |
Minimize marine traffic disturbance on dolphins |
Contractor of Contract No. HY/2013/01 |
Northeast and |
During marine works |
|
V |
Fisheries |
||||||||
S11.7 of HKBCFEIA |
F1 |
-
Reduce re-suspension of sediments -
Limit dredging and works fronts. -
Good site practices |
Minimize marine water
quality Impacts |
Contractor |
Seawall, reclamation area |
During construction |
TM-Water |
V |
S11.7 of HKBCFEIA |
F2 |
Install silt-grease trap in the drainage system collecting surface
runoff |
Minimize impacts on
marine water quality impacts |
Designer |
Reclamation area |
During construction |
TM-Water |
V |
Landscape
& Visual (Detailed Design
Phase) |
||||||||
S HKBCFEIA |
LV1 |
General
design measures include: -
Roadside planting and planting along the edge of the reclamation is proposed; -
Transplanting of mature trees in good health and amenity value where appropriate and reinstatement of areas disturbed during construction by compensatory hydro-seeding and planting; -
Protection measures for the trees to be retained during construction activities; -
Maximizing new tree, shrub and other vegetation planting to compensate tree felled and vegetation removed; -
Providing planting area around peripheral of HKBCF for tree planting screening effect; and -
Providing salt-tolerant native trees along the planter strip at
affected seawall and newly reclaimed coastline. |
Minimize visual & landscape impacts |
Contractor |
HKBCF |
Design Stage |
|
V |
Landscape
& Visual (Construction
Phase) |
||||||||
S HKBCFEIA and S10.9 of TMCLKLEIA |
LV2 |
Mitigate Landscape Impacts G1. Grass-hydroseed or sheeting bare soil
surface and stock pile areas. |
Minimize visual & landscape impacts |
Contractor |
Portion D |
Construction stage |
|
V (Construction) |
G2. Add planting strip and automatic irrigation system if
appropriate at some portions of bridge or footbridge to screen bridge and
traffic. |
Portion D |
V (Construction) |
||||||
G3. For HKLR, providing
aesthetic design on the viaduct, tunnel portals, at-grade roads and
reclamation (e.g. subtle colour tone and slim form for viaduct, aesthetic
design of the bridge form and its structural elements including the parapet,
soffit, columns and so on and decorative urban design elements and lightings
for the HKLR; featured form of tunnel portals, roadside planting along
at-grade roads and landscape berm on & planting along edge of reclamation
area) to beautify the HKLR alignment. |
N/A |
N/A |
||||||
G4. For HKBCF, providing aesthetic architectural design on the
related buildings (e.g. similar materials for PCB building facade to Airport
buildings, roof planting and subtle materials for other facilities buildings
and so on), and the related infrastructure (e.g. parapet planting and
transparent cover for elevated footbridges) to provide harmonic atmosphere of
the HKBCF |
Portion D |
V (Construction) |
||||||
G5. Vegetation reinstatement and upgrading to disturbed areas. |
Pending |
Not Yet Started |
||||||
G6. Maximize new tree, shrub and other vegetation planting to
compensate tree felled and vegetation removed. |
Pending |
Not Yet Started |
||||||
G7. Provide planting area around peripheral of and within HKBCF
and HKLR for tree screening buffer effect. |
Pending |
Not Yet Started |
||||||
G8. Plant salt tolerant native tree and shrubs etc along the
planter strip at affected seawall. |
Shatin to Central Link (SCL) and Central Kowloon Route (CKR) projects |
N/A |
N/A |
|||||
G9. Reserve of loose natural granite rocks for re-use.
Provide new coastline to adopt ¡§natural-look¡¨ by means of using armour rocks
in the form of natural rock materials and planting strip area accommodating
screen buffer to enhance ¡§natural-look¡¨ of the new coastline |
Contractor |
Pending |
Not Yet Started |
|||||
S10.9 of TMCLKLEIA |
LV3 |
Mitigate Landscape Impacts CM1.
Existing trees on boundary of the Project Area shall be carefully protected
during construction. Detailed Tree Protection Specification shall be provided
in the Contract Specification. Under this specification, the Contractor shall
be required to submit, for approval, a detailed working method statement for
the protection of trees prior to undertaking any works adjacent to all
retained trees, including trees in contractor¡¦s works areas. (Tree protection
measures will be detailed at Tree Removal Application stage). CM2. Trees unavoidably affected by the
works shall be transplanted where practical. Trees will be transplanted
straight to their final receptor site and not held in a temporary nursery. A
detailed Tree Transplanting Specification shall be provided in the Contract
Specification. Sufficient time for necessary tree root and crown preparation
periods shall be allowed in the project programme. CM7. Ensure no run-off into water body adjacent
to the Project Area. CM9. Recycle/Reuse all
felled trees and vegetation, e.g. mulching. |
Minimize landscape impact |
Contractor |
All construction site areas |
Construction stage |
|
N/A |
S HKBCFEIA |
LV4 |
Mitigate Visual Impacts V1. Minimize time for construction
activities during construction period. |
Minimize visual & landscape impacts |
Contractor |
All construction site areas |
Construction stage |
|
V |
Mitigate Visual Impacts V2. Provide screen hoarding at the portion
of the project site/ works areas storage areas near VSRs who have close low-
level views to the Project during HKBCF construction. |
N/A |
|||||||
S10.9 of TMCLKLEIA |
LV5 |
Mitigate
Visual Impacts CM5. Screening of
construction works by hoardings around works area in visually unobtrusive
colors, to screen works. CM6. Control night-time
lighting and glare by hooding all lights. CM8. Avoidance of
excessive height and bulk of buildings and structures. |
Minimize visual impact |
Contractor |
All construction site areas |
Construction stage |
|
N/A |
EM&A |
||||||||
S HKBCFEIA |
EM1 |
An
Independent Environmental Checker needs to be employed as per the EM&A
Manual. |
Control
EM&A Performance |
Project Proponent |
All construction
site areas |
Construction stage |
-
EIAO Guidance Note No. 4/2002 -
TM_EIAO |
V |
S15.5 - S15.6 of HKBCFEIA |
EM2 |
An Environmental
Team needs to be employed as per the EM&A Manual. Prepare a systematic
Environmental Management Plan to ensure effective implementation of the
mitigation measures. An
environmental impact monitoring needs to be implementing by the Environmental
Team to ensure all the requirements given in the EM&A Manual are fully
complied with. |
Perform
environmental monitoring & auditing |
Contractor |
All construction
site areas |
Construction stage |
-
EIAO Guidance Note No. 4/2002 -
TM_EIAO |
V |
Legend: V = implemented; x = not implemented; N/A = not
applicable
Appendix H
Statistics on Environmental Complaints,
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
Statistics on Environmental
Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
Reporting Period |
Cumulative Statistic |
||
Complaints |
Notifications of summons |
Successful prosecutions |
|
The reporting period |
0 |
0 |
0 |
From
commencement date of construction to end of reporting month |
17 |
0 |
0 |
Appendix I
Environmental Site Inspection
Schedule
Contract
No.: HY/2013/02
Hong Kong
¡V Zhuhai ¡V Macao Bridge
Hong Kong
Boundary Crossing Facilities ¡V Infrastructure Works Stage I (Western Portion)
Schedule for Weekly
Environmental Site Inspection
January 2018
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental
Site Inspection |
|
|
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental
Site Inspection |
|
|
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental
Site Inspection |
|
|
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental
Site Inspection |
|
|
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
No.: HY/2013/02
Hong Kong
¡V Zhuhai ¡V Macao Bridge
Hong Kong
Boundary Crossing Facilities ¡V Infrastructure Works Stage I (Western Portion)
Schedule for Weekly
Environmental Site Inspection
February 2018
Sun |
Mon |
Tue |
Wed |
Thu |
Fri |
Sat |
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental
Site Inspection |
|
|
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental
Site Inspection |
|
|
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
|
|
Environmental
Site Inspection |
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
Environmental
Site Inspection |
|
|
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appendix J
Investigation Reports on Action Level or Limit
Level Non-compliance
Appendix K
Complaint Investigation Report