1.
This is the Final Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report
prepared by Cinotech Consultants Limited for
¡§Contract No. HY/2011/09 ¡V Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road ¡V
Section between HKSAR Boundary and Scenic Hill¡¨ (hereinafter called the
¡§Contract¡¨). This report documents the findings of Construction Phrase EM&A
Works of the Contract.
2.
The construction commencement of this Contract was on 22nd
February 2013.
3.
As the Construction Phase
EM&A Programme under HY/2011/09 have been
terminated since 24th October 2018 as per EPD¡¦s letter to SOR (EPD¡¦s
ref.: ¡§( ) in AX(2) to EP771/E1/099¡¨ dated 30 November 2018), no impact
monitoring (air quality, construction noise, water quality and dolphin) and
weekly site audit was carried out starting from 24th October 2018.
4.
The Construction activities undertaken in the construction period were:
a)
Viaduct Works (P0 ¡V P115):
¡P
Bore Pilling
¡P
Construction of Pile Cap
¡P
Construction of Column
¡P
SOP (Segment on pile)
¡P
Segment Erection
¡P
Concreting
¡P
Grouting
¡P
E&M Works
¡P
Landscape Works
b)
Land ¡V Portion A:
¡P
Construction of Sloping Seawall
¡P
Landscape Works
¡P
Utilities Diversion
¡P
Road Diversion
¡P
Road Reinstatement
c)
Land ¡V Portion C:
¡P
Utilities Diversion
¡P
Road Diversion
¡P
Road Reinstatement
d)
Works Area 3:
¡P
Storage Area
e)
Works Area 4:
¡P
Storage Area
¡P
Plant Fabrication
f)
Works Area 7:
¡P
Storage Area
¡P
Plant Fabrication
Environmental
Monitoring works
5.
Environmental monitoring for the Contract was performed regularly as
stipulated in the updated EM&A Manual and the monitoring results were
checked and reviewed. Site Inspections/Audits were conducted once per week. The
archeological site inspection were conducted every three months. The
implementation of the environmental mitigation measures, Event Action Plans and
environmental complaint handling procedures were also checked.
6.
Summary of the non-compliance of the construction phrase of this
Contract is tabulated in Table I.
Table I Summary
Table for Non-compliance Recorded Due to the Contract
Environmental Monitoring |
Parameter |
No. of Exceedance |
No. of Exceedance related to the
Construction Activities of this Contract |
Total No. of Exceedance related
to the Construction Activities of this Contract |
||
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|||
Air
Quality |
1-hr TSP |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24-hr TSP |
7 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Noise |
Leq(30min) |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
Water
Quality |
Dissolved
Oxygen (DO) (Surface & Middle) |
24 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dissolved
Oxygen (DO) (Bottom) |
47 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Turbidity |
47 |
120 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Suspended
Solids (SS) |
330 |
223 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Underwater
Noise |
RMS
sound pressure level
re 1µPa |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Dolphin
Monitoring |
Line-transect
Vessel Surveys |
3 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1-hour TSP Monitoring
7.
All 1-hour TSP monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the Contract.
8.
No Action/Limit Level exceedances was recorded for 1-hour TSP monitoring
due to the Contract throughout the whole Contract.
24-hour TSP Monitoring
9.
All 24-hour TSP monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the Contract.
10.
No Action/Limit Level exceedances was recorded for 24-hour TSP monitoring
due to the Contract throughout the whole Contract.
Construction Noise
11.
All construction noise monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the Contract.
12.
1 Action Level exceedance in construction noise was recorded for the
complaints received throughout the construction period due to loading/unloading
of metal plates and oxygen-acetylene set.
The Contractor was required to implement noise mitigation measures to
rectify the problem and was recommended to strengthen their site supervision
and provide training for the workers regularly to increase awareness of their
environmental responsibilities to minimize the noise impact to the nearby
residents.
13.
No Limit Level exceedance in construction noise was recorded due to the
Contract throughout the whole Contract.
Water Quality
14.
All water quality monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the Contract.
15.
No Action/Limit Level exceedance for dissolved oxygen, turbidity and
suspended solid was recorded due to the Contract throughout the whole Contract.
Dolphin
16.
All
dolphin-related monitoring was conducted as scheduled in the Contract. No
Action/Limit Level exceedance for dolphin was recorded due to the Contract
throughout the whole Contract.
Complaint
Log
17.
24 environmental complaints were received since the commencement of the Contract.
In addition, no case of complaint was logged since
5 May 2017. Details of the complaints are shown in Appendix E.
Notification
of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
18.
One successful prosecution was received by subcontractor throughout the
whole Contract. Details of the successful prosecutions are shown in Appendix F.
19.
The EM&A programme were found to be
effective in monitoring impacts arising from the Contract. The findings of the
environmental monitoring program suggest that no adverse impacts on sensitive
receivers at the designated monitoring locations were brought about by the
Contract.
20.
In conclusion, the Contract was environmentally acceptable in terms of air quality, noise levels, water
quality, dolphin, cultural heritage and landscape and visual.
21.
Post-construction monitoring for water quality was carried out after the
termination of Construction Phase EM&A Programme as per
EPD¡¦s letter to SOR (EPD¡¦s ref.: ¡§( ) in AX(2) to EP771/E1/099¡¨ dated 30
November 2018) according to the updated EM&A Manual. Details of the
Post-construction water quality monitoring is provided in the report as shown
in Appendix H.
22.
In addition, post-construction dolphin monitoring has also been started after
completion of construction according to updated EM&A Manual, Section
10.7.1, and the corresponding reports will be submitted
separately.