|
Log
Ref.
|
Location
|
Received
Date
|
Details
of Complaint
|
Investigation/
Mitigation Action
|
Status
|
|
Com-2013-04-001
|
Near Tung Chung New Development Pier
|
8 April 2013
|
EPD received
the complaint on 8 April 2013. The complainant complained about oil was dumped from various vessels
operating for Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong (HZMB HK) Projects near Tung Chung New Development Pier over the past few
months.
|
1) The vessels
photos in the complainant's photo are not the working vessels under Contract
No. HK/2011/09.
2) No oil
dumped from Contract No. HK/2011/09's working vessels was observed according
to ET’s site inspection conducted on 9 April 2013 at near Tung Chung New
Development Ferry Pier.
3) Joint site
inspection (DCVJV and ARUP) was conducted on 10 April 2013 and confirmed that
Contract No. HY/2011/09’s vessels are not involved the complaint case.
4) DCVJV will
keep remind their boat crews not discharging contaminated effluent directly
into the sea.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2013-05-001
|
WA6
|
2 May 2013
|
ARUP received
the complaint on 2 May 2013. The complainant alleged the noise nuisance was
generated from the Works Area WA6 at around 13:00 on 1 May 2013 (Wednesday).
|
The site diary
report was reviewed and confirmed that no works were carried out at WA6 on 1
May 2013. In addition, no noise was heard from WA6 according to the security
guard who on duty at WA6 on 1 May 2013. Based on the information provided,
the complaint regarding the construction noise at WA6 is not considered
justifiable.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2013-05-002
|
WA6
|
18 May 2013
|
ARUP received
the complaint on 18 May 2013. The complainant advised that the noise nuisance
due to loading of metal parts at barge near the seawall of Works Area WA6
early morning (around8:45a.m) on 18 May 2013 (Saturday).
|
Based on the
record of site activities at WA6 on 18 May 2013, 4 metal plates and 2
oxygen-acetylene set were lifted onto a derrick boat “Chiu Kee” by a crane
near seawall at WA6 in the morning on that day. Such operation was commenced
around 8:40a.m and completed in 10 minutes during the normal construction
working hour (0700 – 1900 Monday to Saturday). However, the duration of
aforesaid activities is very short and infrequent. Nevertheless, the
Contractor was reminded to strengthen their site supervision and provide
training for the workers regularly to increase awareness of their
environmental responsibilities to minimize the noise impact to the nearby
residents and the specific mitigation measures for the complaint including
but not limited to:-
•To place
wooden planks or rubber mats on ground for loading and unloading heavy or
metal objects; and
•To deploy
professional personnel to supervise the works.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2013-05-003
|
Near Tung Chung New Development Pier
|
18 May 2013
|
EPD received
the public complaint on 18 May 2013. This complaint was a follow-up of a
previous complaint received by EPD on 8 April 2013 (Com-2013-04-001).
The
complainant complained again about the oil was dumped from various vessels
operating for Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong (HZMB HK) Projects near
Tung Chung New Development Pier over the past months.
|
After
receiving the complaint, additional site inspection was conducted at near
Tung Chung New Development Pier on 30 May 2013 to investigate whether oil
dumped was due to Contract No. HY/2011/09’s vessels. During the site
inspection, three working vessels under Contract No.HY/2011/09 was anchored
off near Tung Chung New Development Pier. No oil dumped from Contract No.
HY/2011/09’s vessels were observed and the water around the vessels was
clear.
The following
mitigation measures have been implemented by DCVJV:
• DCVJV has sent the letter to the
shipping agent to remind them to ensure the vessels under Contract No.
HY/2011/09 are in good condition and any oil dumped to sea should be avoided
to prevent water pollution.
• Provide training to the vessel
skippers for prevention of pollution from ships.
• DCVJV requested vessel skippers to
provide engine oil disposal records The vessel skippers assured to us that
all waste lubricants were sent to waste collectors regularly and no oil
discharge into seawater.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2013-07-001
|
Southeast Quay
of Chek Lap Kok near the junction of Chek Lap Kok South Road and Scenic Road
|
17 July 2013
|
The complaint
was received by EPD on 17th July 2013. According to the EPD’s
letter, the complainant was concerned for the noise nuisance generated from
the operation of concrete lorry mixers during evening and night-time period
at Southeast Quay of Chek Lap Kok.
|
In response to
the complaint, ET conducted two times site inspections at Southeast Quay at
Chek Lap Kok between 18:45 and 20:30 hours on 23 July 2013 and 20:30 to 22:30
hours on 30 July 2013.
During the
inspections, the Ro-Ro barge was observed anchored off Southeast Quay at Chek
Lap Kok but no concrete lorry mixer was observed throughout the inspection.
On 23 July
2013, at about 19:35, one tug boat was observed travelling to Southeast Quay,
Chek Lap Kok and left at about 19:40.
On 30 July
2013, no tug boat and concrete lorry mixers were observed during the
inspection.
According to
the Contractor, there was no concreting works for the pier sites on 23 July
2013 and therefore no loading and unloading operation at Southeast Quay at
Chek Lap Kok.
Concreting
works were performed at Pier 0 on 30 July 2013. As the Contractor anticipated the
arrival time of tug boat and flap-top barge at Southeast Quay will exceed
23:00 hours after the concreting works, they decided to arrange the tug boat
and flap-top barge with concrete lorry mixers anchored off around Pier 66
after 23:00 hours. So, no loading and unloading operation at Southeast Quay
at Chek Lap Kok was observed.
Further night time site inspection was conducted on 22 August 2013 during
the loading and unloading operation at Southeast Quay of Chek Lap Kok, the
construction works conducted under Contract No. HY/2011/09 complied with the
conditions in the CNP No. GW-RS0895-13.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2013-11-001
|
Chek Lap Kok (CLK) South Road
|
16 November 2013
|
The complaint
was received by project
customer services on 16th November 2013 regarding the dust problem at Chek Lap Kok (CLK) South Road.
|
After receiving the complaint, ET conducted the site inspection on 19
and 29 November 2013 to check the appropriate environmental protection and
pollution control measures which are properly implemented by the Contractor
under HY/2011/09 (DCVJV). The observation are summarized as below:-
l
Dust generation works was conducted by the other
Contractor at South East Quay
l
Proper watering of haul road to avoid dust generation during vehicle /
plant equipment movement.
l
Vehicle washing facilities provided at every site
exit at CLK South Road and South Perimeter Road.
l
No dark smoke was observed emitting from the
plant equipments.
Based on the information collected, the complaint
of dust problem at Check Lap Kok South Road is considered not related to Contract
No. HY/2011/09 as dust suppression
measures has been properly implemented by the Contractor on site to prevent
dust nuisance from the construction activities.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-01-001
|
Hong
Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road – Section between HKSAR Boundary
and Scenic Hill (Contract No. HY/2011/09
|
3 January 2014
|
The complaint was received by EPD on 3rd January 2014. According to the EPD’s
letter, a resident in Tai O District was concerned for the noise nuisance
occasionally arising from the hammering or hitting of metals from Contract
No. HY/2011/09.
|
In response to the complaint, ET conducted an ad hoc night time site
inspection at P0, P18 and P19 on 14 January 2014 between around 23:00 and
00:30 hours of 15 January 2014.
In accordance with the site activities record and site inspections,
the construction works conducted under Contract No. HY/2011/09 complied with
the conditions in the CNP No. GW-RS1108-13.
Nevertheless, the Contractor was advised to strictly follow the
conditions of the permit because any deviation from the conditions may lead
to cancellation of the permit, subsequent prosecution action and the
Authority’s refusal to issue further permit.
In addition, the following environmental mitigation measures were
recommended:
·
Review and adjust the lighting directions of the
barge, under safety consideration, to avoid potential visual impacts to
residents in vicinities;
·
To
ensure the equipment are maintaining in good operation condition; and
·
To
strengthen site supervision and provide training for the workers regularly to
increase awareness of their environmental responsibilities to minimize the
noise impact to the nearby residents and the specific mitigation measures.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-01-002
|
Hong
Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge
|
16 January 2014
|
The complaint was received by HyD’s PR Team on 16 January 2014 that
the complainant advised that the heavy exhaust fume affecting Tung Chung
Crescent.
|
After receiving the complaint, ET conducted the site inspection on 21
January 2014 to check all the plant equipments which were operated for the
construction works and air quality mitigation measures.
Based on the information collected, the complaint of heavy exhausts
affecting Tung Chung Crescent is considered not related to Contract No. HY/2011/09 due to the following
reason(s):-
1) The work sites
at Portion C and South East Quay at Portion A under Contract No. HY/2011/09 are approximately 800m from Tung Chung Crescent.
Any unpleasant smell of exhaust fume would not be anticipated.
2) No heavy smoke
was observed emitting from plants / equipment during the site inspection on
21 January 2014.
3) The vehicles
and equipments were switched off while not in use.
4) All plant and
equipment were well maintained and in good operating condition.
5)
Air quality mitigation measures has been properly implemented by the
Contractor on site to prevent dust nuisance from the construction activities.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-03-001
|
Oil Spillage at
near Sha Lo Wan
|
5 March 2014
|
The complaint was received by EPD on 5
March 2014. The complainant suspected the
oil leakage from
the works area of Contract No. HY/2011/09 near Sha Lo Wan
|
Based on ET site inspection, no oil spillage from the works
area under Contract No. HY/2011/09
at near Sha Lo Wan was observed.
In addition, spill kits are ready on site in order
to dealing with spillage cases promptly.
Nevertheless, DCVJV was also recommended the
mitigation measures as below:
• Provide training for the workers regularly
regarding the mitigation measures on waste / chemical management.
• Provide sufficient chemical spillage kit (e.g. oil
absorbent) to all vessels and working platform.
• Regular check the condition of vessels and plant
equipments to ensure no leakage
of oil.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-03-002
|
Construction Noise in the vicinity of the
waters outside
Sha Lo Wan
|
11 March 2014
|
The complaint was received by EPD on 11
March 2014. According to the EPD’s
letter, the complainant was concerned for
the mobile crane which operating in the
vicinity of the waters outside Sha Lo Wan
after 23:00.
|
In accordance with an ad hoc site inspection on 18
March 2014, no construction works were conducted during the restricted hours.
The
1st investigation report has been submitted to EPD on 21 March
2014 and the 2nd
investigation report was submitted to EPD on 26 June 2014.
The Contractor was advised to strictly follow the
conditions of the permit because any deviation from the conditions may lead
to cancellation of the permit, subsequent prosecution action and the
Authority’s refusal to issue further permit.
Nevertheless, the Contractor was reminded to take
sufficient noise mitigation measures to minimize the environmental impact on
the nearby community:
· To space out noisy equipment and position it as
far away as possible from the sensitive receivers;
· To avoid concurrent uses of noisy equipment near
the sensitive area;
· To ensure the equipment are maintaining in good
operation condition;
· To turned off any idle equipment on site; and
· To enclose the noisy part of the machine by
acoustic insulation material if feasible.
· To arrange tailor-made training for the Production
Team including the management and
foremen to explain to them the conditions and requirements listed on the CNP.
· To delegate one Engineer for ensuring that all
construction activities and PMEs used are in full compliance with the CNP and
legislative requirements.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-04-001
|
Construction
marine works by the company Bauer Hong Kong in Tung Chung
|
14 April 2014
|
The complaint was
received by Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department (AFCD) on 14
April 2014, the complainant complained that the dead dolphin was found under
a platform at construction marine works by the company Bauer Hong Kong in
Tung Chung (Macau Bridge Piling Works)
|
In accordance with the photos showing a date of 27 November 2013
(08:00 – 08:25a.m.) which provided by the complainant, the dolphin was
observed has been dead for some time and shows signs of decomposition. It was
difficult to determine the cause of death of the deceased dolphin based on
the photographs and the dead dolphin was found a few months ago. By examining
the photos, it is found that the body was beside a barge, not under a working
platform.
In addition, the dead dolphin was found in the early morning in which
the marine construction works have not been commenced. Therefore, from the
above information the dead dolphin is considered to be washed to the work
site.
However, there is no
significant increase of cetacean stranding were found in Hong Kong since the
commencement of Contact No. HY/2011/09.
In regard to the
complaint, the following recommendations were made:
|
Ø
In case stranded cetaceans are found, the AFCD
shall be contacted immediately and provide the following information to
facilitate AFCD’s investigation:
|
1.
Name and telephone number;
2.
Date and time of discovery;
3.
Location (as specific as possible);
4.
Status of the stranded animal (i.e. alive,
freshly dead, slightly decomposed, rotten, mummified);
5.
Type and size of the stranded animal.
Ø
To implement Dolphin Exclusion Zone during the
installation of bored pile casing located in the waters to the west of
Airport.
Ø
To implement Dolphin Watching Plan after the
bored piling casing is installed.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-05-001
|
At the shore
of Sha Lo Wan
|
13 May 2014
|
The complaint was
received by EPD on 13 May 2014. According to the EPD’s email, the complainant was concerned about the sand material that was excavated on the shore of Sha Lo Wan for the construction of Hong
Kong - Zhuhai - Macao Bridge (HZMB) Project on 11 May 2014.
|
After receiving the complaint from a Sha Lo Wan’s village resident,
the sub-contractor was instructed to stop the sand excavation and leave
immediately. In addition, all
sands excavated from the shore of Sha Lo Wan were returned back to the
original area on 13 May 2014.
Nevertheless, the Contractor was advised to arrange tailor-made training for Production Team including the management and foremen to explain to them the conditions and requirements listed
on the Environmental Permit.
In addition, indicative poles and flags are recommended to put within the site boundary to identify the extent
of land areas in Sha Lo Wan / Sha Lo Wan (West) Archaeological site.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-05-002
|
At the shore
of Sha Lo Wan
|
27 May 2014
|
The complaint was
received by EPD on 27 May 2014. According to the EPD’s email, the complainant was concerned about the dumping rubbles along the shore area of Sha Lo Wan on 27 May 2014.
|
The complaint
investigation report for the complaint of dumping rubbles along the shore
area of Sha Lo Wan was submitted to EPD on 4 June 2014.
EPD and AFCD
provided their comments on 5 and 9 June 2014 respectively.
A meeting
among DCVJV, ARUP, IEC, ET, EPD and AFCD was held on 17 June 2014. According
to the meeting, further information is required to include in the complaint
investigation report and the report was submitted to EPD on 4 March 2015.
|
Complaint investigation report is under review by EPD
|
|
Com-2014-05-003
|
Pier 39 to 50
|
29 May 2014
|
ARUP received the
complaint on 29 May 2013. The complainant advised that the workers disposed
hundreds of kg of waste spoils (concrete and earth) into the sea every day in
the existing locations of HZMB site area.
|
Based on the
investigation findings, the waste spoils (concrete and earth) were disposed
to HY/2010/02
Project according to approved WMP.
The following
recommendations were made:
· To check for any accumulation of waste
spoils (concrete and earth) on site.
· To cover the wastes skip with waste
spoils before removing from site.
· To carry out inspection of pier(s)
regularly to ensure the frontline staff loads inert materials to approved
barge properly.
· To clean the waste storage areas regularly
and do not cause dust nuisance.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-08-001
|
Near Sha Lo
Wan
|
27 August 2014
|
ARUP received the
complaint on 27 August 2013. The complainant was concerned about the dust on
the surface of the roro-barge.
|
Based on the
investigation findings, dusty materials at the ro-ro barge at P63 and dust
generation when vehicles passing by at the roro-barge at Southeast Quay were
observed. The following recommendations were made:
· To check for any accumulation of dusty
materials at roro-barge.
· To cover the stockpile of dusty materials
before removing from site.
· To clean the surface of roro-barge
regularly and do not cause dust and water quality nuisance.
· To maintain the surface of roro-barge wet
especially during the vehicle movements. Water misting is considered an
acceptable measure to control dust emissions.
· To check and replace the worn sand bags
at the surface of roro-barge to prevent the turbid water from entering to the
sea when watering the barge surface.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-11-001
|
HZMB-HKLR –
Section between HKSAR Boundary and Scenic Hill (Contract No. HY/2011/09)
|
11 November 2014
|
The complaint
was received by EPD on 11 November 2014. According to the EPD’s email, the
complaint was received from one of the green groups Sea Shepherd. They
complained that the residual concrete had been washed off from the deck
surface of a flat-top barge into the sea, and marine littering had been
spotted by a worker of HZMB-HKLR – Section between HKSAR Boundary and Scenic
Hill (Contract No. HY/2011/09)
|
Based on the
investigation findings, residue concrete or wastewater contaminated with
concrete overflowing/spilling into the sea from the roro barge and marine
littering were suspected. The
following recommendations were made:
Ø Properly clear
the concrete stains on the three ro-ro barges (e.g. hand-held equipments such
as shovel etc). Tarpaulin sheet is also recommended to provide when clearing
the concrete stains at the edge of roro barge to prevent these removed
materials from getting into the sea. The worker should also pay special care
to remove the concrete stains to minimize the water quality nuisance.
Ø Keep
cleanliness of the surface of roro-barge and do not cause water quality
nuisance.
Ø To check and
reinforce the concrete / sand bag bund between baffles erected near the edge
of the three ro-ro barges to avoid accidental leakage of wastewater from the
deck regularly.
Ø Keep all
debris/ aggregate away from the edge of ro-ro barge to prevent them from
falling into the sea.
Ø Provide
sufficient skips for temporary storage of concrete residue/wastewater.
Ø To check for
any accumulation of residual waste concrete at the waste skip on roro-barge.
Ø Provide spare
and sufficient sand bags at each roro barges to confine the concerned area in
the event of accidental spillage of concrete when discharge the concrete from
the concrete lorry mixers to pump truck.
Ø Provide
absorptive materials to absorb the wastewater in case of accidental spillage
of wastewater during washing concrete lorry mixers or other equipments.
Ø Assign trained
staff to ensure proper management of environmental matters on each of the
ro-ro barges in particular the handling of concrete residue/wastewater
generated during operation.
Ø Keep record
for collection of skip or temporary storage tank for wastewater and excess
concrete.
Ø Ensure
sufficient garbage bag / rubbish bin are provided at working barge / pier
site.
Ø Provide
training for the workers regularly regarding the water quality mitigation
measures and waste management to increase their awareness of environmental
protection.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-11-002
|
HZMB-HKLR –
Section between HKSAR Boundary and Scenic Hill (Contract No. HY/2011/09)
|
18 November 2014
|
The complaint
was received by EPD on 18 November 2014. According to the EPD’s email, it was
alleged that residual concrete had been poured out directly from the concrete
lorry mixers on a roro barge into the sea during night-time by the workers of
HZMB-HKLR – Section between HKSAR Boundary and Scenic Hill (Contract No.
HY/2011/09)
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-11-003
|
Floating
Concrete Batching Plant (FCBP)
|
28 November 2014
|
The complaint was
received by EPD on 28 November 2014. The complaint was received from one of
the green groups Green Lantau Association. They complained about the hauling of the
floating concrete batching plant (FCBP) by the tug boat to the site of
Contract No. HY/2011/09 from the north-east side had disturbed the seabed
causing an increase of turbidity in marine waters at around noon of 15
November 2014.
|
Based on the information collected, the following conclusions were
drawn:
1) It is
suspected that the wake following the FCBP was resulted from disturbance to
the bottom sediment when it was traveling during the lowest tide on that day.
2) The FCBP was
traveling within the site area and the maximum number of movement of a
floating plant (and therefore tug boat) is two times per day. Average
duration of each movement is around 1 hour/day. Therefore, the disturbance to
the bottom sediment is considered temporary, localized and infrequent.
3) No illegally
discharge of wastewater or domestic wastewater to the sea from FCBP.
4) Relevant
environmental mitigation measures as shown in EP-352/2009/C were properly
implemented.
5) No
deterioration of marine water quality based on the marine water quality
monitoring results on 15 November 2014.
Nevertheless, DCVJV was also recommended the mitigation measures as
below:
· The vessel skipper should pay special
care about the movement of deep draught vessel to avoid seabed disturbance.
(e.g. speed restrictions)
· In case of sediment plume was found
behind vessel, the vessel skipper should further reduce vessel speed.
· Minimum clearance of 0.6m should be
maintained between vessels and the seabed in all tide conditions, to ensure
that undue turbidity is not generated by turbulence from vessel movement or
propeller wash. (Reference: EIA-081/2002 - Construction of Lung Kwu Chau
Jetty)
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-12-001
|
Shores of Po
Chue Tam and Shek Tsai Po, Tai O
|
7 December 2014
|
The complaint was
received from one of the green groups Green Lantau Association. They
complained about some waste
materials (including a number of grey plastic mats and buoys) suspected in
relation to the HZMB works have recently washed up on the shores of Po Chue
Tam and Shek Tsai Po, Tai O
|
The owner of objects found on the shores could not be identified. DCVJV has taken
initiative to remove these materials after receiving the complaint.
Nevertheless, DCVJV was also recommended the mitigation measures as
below:
· Gather up and remove debris to keep the
work site orderly.
· Maintain site housekeeping. Designate
areas for waste materials and provide containers.
· Secure loose or light material that is
stored on open floors.
· Do not permit rubbish to fall freely from
any level of the pier sites.
· Provide training for the workers
regularly regarding the water quality mitigation measures and waste
management to increase their awareness of environmental protection.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-12-002
|
Site Office of
HZMB-HKLR – Section between HKSAR Boundary and Scenic Hill
|
2 December 2014
|
Highways
Department (HyD) received a public complaint from a resident of Le Bleu Duex
on 2 December 2014. According to the email from ARUP dated 3 December 2014,
the complainant advised that the noise nuisance due to the metal parts were
dropped onto the ground by people repetitively and loading or unloading a
boat at the pier. The complaint was quoted, “A resident living in Le Bleu Duex addressed a complaint to CE of HyD
at about 20:04 hrs last night. He complained about the noise nuisance coming
from site office since 19:30 hrs last night. Repetitively metal parts
had been dropped on the ground by people who seem to be loading or
unloading a boat at the pier. Noise was still going on right now at
20:04.”
|
Based on the information collected, the noise generated is considered
due to the metal parts were
dropped onto the ground at the seashore
area near Le Bleu Duex.
The metal pipe was unloaded at non-designated
area and
no powered mechanical equipment was used for unloading works at WA6 during
restricted hour.
The Contractor was reminded to take sufficient noise mitigation
measures to minimize the environmental impact on the nearby community as
recommended in the approved EIA report and the specific mitigation measures
for the complaint including but not limited to:-
· To place wooden planks or rubber mats on
ground for loading and unloading heavy or metal objects; and
· To deploy professional personnel to
supervise the works.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2014-12-003
|
Along the
shore from Yat Tung to Tai O
|
24 December 2014
|
The complainant was concerned
about the increase of marine refuse (water bottles and debris) along
the shore from Yat Tung to Tai O suspected in relation to the HZMB works.
|
The owner of marine refuse found on the shores could not be identified. DCVJV has taken
initiative to remove these wastes after receiving the complaint. DCVJV will
also take the initiative to clear the marine refuse along the shore from Yat
Tung to Tai O, if necessary.
Nevertheless, DCVJV was also recommended the mitigation measures as
below:
· Gather up and remove debris to keep the
work site orderly.
· Maintain site housekeeping. Designate
areas for waste materials and provide containers.
· Secure loose or light material that is
stored on open floors.
· Do not permit rubbish to fall freely from
any level of the pier sites.
· Provide training for the workers
regularly regarding the water quality mitigation measures and waste
management to increase their awareness of environmental protection.
|
Closed
|
|
Com-2015-06-001
|
The sea side
at WA6 vertical seawall
|
6 June 2015
|
A resident
living in Le Bleu Duex complained about noise from a barge which unloading
materials at about 21:00 hrs last Saturday i.e. 6 June 2015
|
Based on the
information collected, the noise generated is considered due to the unloading
of steel casings to the seashore area opposite to the China State Site
Office.
The person-in-charge of the barge has been reprimanded by the
Contractor for causing noise nuisance to resident nearby.
In addition, the Contractor had also reminded their subcontractors to
avoid unloading of materials during restricted hours (i.e. 19:00 to 07:00
hours on any day and any time on public holidays including Sundays) without
Construction Noise Permit (CNP).
The Contractor was reminded to obtain Construction Noise Permit (CNP)
for PME use in restricted hours.
The Contractor was reminded again to take sufficient noise mitigation
measures to minimize the environmental impact on the nearby community as
recommended in the approved EIA report and the specific mitigation measures
for the complaint including but not limited to:-
· To place wooden planks or rubber mats on
ground for loading and unloading heavy or metal objects; and
· To deploy professional personnel to
supervise the works.
|
Closed
|