Contract No. HY/2011/03
Hong
Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road
Section
between Scenic Hill and Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities
Quarterly
EM&A Report No.2 (December 2012 to February 2013)
30 May 2013
Revision 2
Main Contractor Designer
Contents
Executive Summary
1.4 Construction
Works Undertaken During the Reporting Period
2.1 Summary
of EM&A Requirements
3....... Environmental Monitoring
and Audit
3.1 Implementation of Environmental
Measures
3.2 Air Quality Monitoring Results
3.4 Water Quality Monitoring Results
3.5 Dolphin Monitoring Results
3.6 Mudflat Monitoring Results
3.7 Solid and Liquid Waste Management
Status
3.8 Environmental
Licenses and Permits
4....... Environmental Complaint and Non-compliance
4.2 Summary of Environmental Complaint,
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution
5....... COMMENTS, RECOMMENDATIONS
AND CONCLUSION
Figures
Figure 1.1 Location
of the Site
Figure 2.1 Environmental
Monitoring Stations
Figure 2.2 Transect
Line Layout in Northwest and Northeast Lantau Survey Areas
Appendices
Appendix A Environmental
Management Structure
Appendix B Construction
Programme
Appendix C Location of
Works Areas
Appendix D Event and
Action Plan
Appendix E Implementation Schedule of Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Appendix
F Site
Audit Findings and Corrective Actions
Appendix G Air Quality Monitoring Data and
Graphical Plots
Appendix H Noise Monitoring Data and Graphical Plots
Appendix I Water Quality Monitoring Data
and Graphical Plots
Appendix J Dolphin
Monitoring Results
Appendix L Summary of
Environmental Licenses and Permits
Appendix M Record of Notification of
Environmental Quality Limit Exceedances
Appendix
N Cumulative
Statistics on Complaints
Appendix O Mudflat
Monitoring Results
Executive Summary
The Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge (HZMB) Hong Kong Link Road (HKLR)
serves to connect the HZMB Main Bridge at the Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region (HKSAR) Boundary and the HZMB Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities
(HKBCF) located at the north eastern waters of the Hong Kong International
Airport (HKIA).
The HKLR project has been separated into two contracts. They are Contract No. HY/2011/03 Hong
Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link Road-Section between Scenic Hill and
Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities (hereafter referred to as the Contract)
and Contract No. HY/2011/09 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Link
Road-Section between HKSAR Boundary and Scenic Hill.
China State Construction Engineering (Hong Kong) Ltd. was awarded by
Highways Department as the Contractor to undertake the construction works of
Contract No. HY/2011/03. The main
works of the Contract include land tunnel at Scenic Hill, tunnel underneath
Airport Road and Airport Express Line, reclamation and tunnel to the east coast
of the Airport Island, at-grade road connecting to the HKBCF and highway works
of the HKBCF within the Airport Island and in the vicinity of the HKLR
reclamation. The Contract is part
of the HKLR Project and HKBCF Project, these projects are considered to be
¡§Designated Projects¡¨, under Schedule 2 of the Environmental Impact Assessment
(EIA) Ordinance (Cap 499) and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Reports
(Register No. AEIAR-144/2009 and AEIAR-145/2009) were prepared for the
Project. The current Environmental
Permit (EP) EP-352/2009/A for HKLR and EP-353/2009/F for HKBCF were issued on
31 October 2011 and 24 April 2013, respectively. These documents are available
through the EIA Ordinance Register. The construction phase of Contract was commenced
on 17 October 2012.
BMT Asia Pacific Limited has been appointed by the Contractor to
implement the Environmental Monitoring & Audit (EM&A) programme for the
Contract in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual for HKLR (Version 1.0)
and will be providing environmental team services to the Contract.
This is the second Quarterly EM&A report for the Contract which
summaries the monitoring results and audit findings of the EM&A programme
during the reporting period from 1 December
2012 to
28 February 2013.
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Progress
The EM&A programme were undertaken in
accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual for HKLR (Version1.0). A summary of the monitoring activities
during this reporting period is presented as below:
Monitoring Activity |
Monitoring Date |
|||
December 2012 |
January 2013 |
February
2013 |
||
Air
Quality |
1-hr TSP |
7, 13, 19, 24 and 28 |
3, 9, 15, 21, 25 and 31 |
6, 14, 20, and 26 |
24-hr TSP |
6, 12, 18, 21 and 27 |
2, 8, 14, 18, 24 and 30 |
6, 14, 19, and 25 |
|
Noise |
3, 13, 19 and 24* |
3, 9, 15, 21 and 31 |
6, 14, 20, and 26 |
|
Water
Quality |
1, 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, 14, 17, 19, 21, 24, 26, 28 and
31 |
2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 14, 16, 18, 21, 23, 25,
28 and 30 |
1, 4, 6, 8, 11, 13, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25
and 27 |
|
Chinese
White Dolphin |
6, 7, 11 and 13 |
2, 4, 8 and 10 |
1, 6, 18 and 20 |
|
Mudflat Monitoring |
1, 2, 3, 8, 15 and 16 |
- |
- |
|
Site Inspection |
4, 11, 18 and 28 |
2, 10, 15, 22 and 29 |
5, 14, 19, and 26 |
*There
were problems about the extension cable for the noise monitoring undertaken on
24 Dec 2012 and the measured noise levels were considered invalid.
Breaches
of Action and Limit Levels
A summary of environmental exceedances for this reporting period is as follows:
Environmental Monitoring |
Parameters |
Action Level (AL) |
Limit Level (LL) |
Air
Quality |
1-hr
TSP |
0 |
0 |
24-hr
TSP |
0 |
0 |
|
Noise |
Leq
(30 min) |
0 |
0 |
Water
Quality |
Suspended
solids level (SS) |
51 |
350 |
Turbidity
level |
59 |
305 |
|
Dissolved
oxygen level (DO) |
0 |
0 |
The Environmental Team investigated all exceedances and found that they
were not project related.
All investigation reports for exceedances of the Contract have been submitted
to ENPO/IEC for comments and/or follow up to identify whether the exceedances
occurred related to other HZMB contracts.
Implementation of Mitigation Measures
Site Inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the implementation
of proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the
Project. Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities
were monitored and reviewed.
Complaint
Log
A summary of environmental complaints for this reporting period is as
follows:
Environmental
Complaint No. (1) |
Date of
Complaint Received |
Description
of Environmental Complaints |
COM-2013-015 |
17
January 2013 |
Air
Quality |
COM-2013-016 |
18
January 2013 |
Water
Quality |
Remarks:
(1) If a
complainant makes complaint for the same environmental issue, only one
complaint number will be assigned for the complaint.
Notifications of Summons
and Prosecutions
There were no notifications of summons or prosecutions received during
this reporting period.
Reporting
Changes
This report has been developed in compliance with the reporting
requirements for the quarterly summary EM&A reports as required by the
Updated EM&A Manual for HKLR (Version 1.0). There are no reporting changes.
Table 1.1 Construction
Activities During Reporting Period
Site Area |
Description of Activities |
WA 6 |
Construction
of site office |
Portion Y |
Ground Investigation Work Site clearing for road and drainage work Erection of Hoardings and Fencings at Site Boundaries Installation of Soil Nails Access Shaft Construction for SHT & HAT |
Portion B |
Site formation work for tunnelling at West Portal |
Portion X |
Marine Site investigation Installation of silt curtain and geotextile laying Removal of armour rocks of existing seawall Formation of temporary stone platform Installation of stone column |
Kwo Lo Wan Road |
Reclamation |
Table
2.1 Summary
of Impact EM&A Requirements
Environmental
Monitoring |
Description |
Monitoring
Station |
Frequencies |
Remarks
|
Air Quality |
1-hr TSP |
AMS 5 & AMS 6 |
At least 3 times every 6 days |
While the highest dust impact was expected. |
24-hr TSP |
At least once every 6 days |
-- |
||
Noise |
Leq (30mins), |
NMS5 |
At least once per week |
Daytime on normal weekdays
(0700-1900 hrs). |
Water Quality |
¡P Depth ¡P Temperature ¡P Salinity ¡P Dissolved Oxygen
(DO) ¡P Suspended Solids
(SS) ¡P DO Saturation ¡P Turbidity ¡P pH |
¡P Impact Stations: ¡P Control/Far Field
Stations: ¡P Sensitive Receiver
Stations: |
Three times per week
during mid-ebb and mid-flood tides (within ¡Ó 1.75 hour of the predicted time) |
3 (1 m below water surface,
mid-depth and 1 m above sea bed, except where the water depth is less than 6
m, in which case the mid-depth station may be omitted. Should the water depth be less than 3
m, only the mid-depth station will be monitored). |
Dolphin |
Line-transect
Methods |
Northeast Lantau survey
area and Northwest Lantau survey area |
Twice per month |
-- |
Mudflat |
Horseshoe crabs, seagrass beds, intertidal soft shore communities,
sedimentation rates and water quality |
San Tau and Tung Chung Bay |
Once every 3 months |
-- |
Table
2.2 Action
and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP, 24-hour TSP and Noise
Environmental
Monitoring |
Parameters |
Monitoring Station |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Air
Quality |
1-hr
TSP |
AMS 5 |
352 µg/m3 |
500 µg/m3 |
AMS 6 |
360 µg/m3 |
|||
24-hr
TSP |
AMS 5 |
164 µg/m3 |
260 µg/m3 |
|
AMS 6 |
173 µg/m3 |
|||
Noise |
Leq
(30 min) |
NMS 5 |
When one documented complaint is received |
75 dB(A) |
Table
2.3 Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality
Parameter
(unit) |
Water
Depth |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L) |
Surface and Middle |
5.0 |
4.2 except 5 for Fish
Culture Zone |
Bottom |
4.7 |
3.6 |
|
Turbidity (NTU) |
Depth average |
27.5 or 120% of upstream
control station¡¦s turbidity at the same tide of the same day |
47.0 or 130% of turbidity
at the upstream control station at the same tide of same day |
Suspended Solid (SS)
(mg/L) |
Depth average |
23.5 or 120% of upstream
control station¡¦s SS at the same tide of the same day |
34.4 or 130% of SS at the
upstream control station at the same tide of same day and 10mg/L for Water
Services Department Seawater Intakes |
(1) Depth-averaged is
calculated by taking the arithmetic means of reading of all three depths.
(2) For DO, non-compliance
of the water quality limit occurs when monitoring result is lower that the
limit.
(3) For SS & turbidity
non-compliance of the water quality limits occur when monitoring result is
higher than the limits.
The Event Actions Plans for air quality,
noise and water quality are annexed in Appendix D.
Table 3.1 Summary
of 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results During the Reporting Period
Reporting period |
Monitoring Station |
Average (mg/m3) |
Range (mg/m3) |
Action Level (mg/m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
December 2012 |
AMS5 |
99 |
27 ¡V 267 |
352 |
500 |
AMS6 |
67 |
29 ¡V 177 |
360 |
||
January 2013 |
AMS5 |
71 |
26 ¡V 127 |
352 |
|
AMS6 |
88 |
38 ¡V 234 |
360 |
||
February
2013 |
AMS5 |
56 |
31 ¡V 98 |
352 |
|
AMS6 |
58 |
27 ¡V 98 |
360 |
Table 3.2 Summary
of 24-hour TSP Monitoring Results During the Reporting Period
Reporting period |
Monitoring Station |
Average (mg/m3) |
Range (mg/m3) |
Action Level (mg/m3) |
Limit Level (mg/m3) |
December 2012 |
AMS5 |
81 |
36 ¡V 161 |
164 |
260 |
AMS6 |
78 |
42 ¡V 125 |
173 |
||
January 2013 |
AMS5 |
107 |
68 ¡V 128 |
164 |
|
AMS6 |
114 |
49 ¡V 170 |
173 |
||
February
2013 |
AMS5 |
48 |
30 ¡V 64 |
164 |
|
AMS6 |
48 |
17 ¡V 70 |
173 |
Table 3.3 Summary
of Construction Noise Monitoring Results During the Reporting Period
Reporting period |
Monitoring Station |
Average Leq
(30 mins), dB(A) |
Range of Leq
(30 mins), dB(A) |
Action Level |
Limit Level Leq
(30 mins), dB(A) |
December 2012 |
NMS5 |
61 |
60 ¡V 63 |
When one documented complaint is received |
75 |
January 2013 |
63 |
58 ¡V 75 |
|||
February 2013 |
60 |
58 ¡V 63 |
SPSE = ((S / E) x 100) / SA%
DPSE = ((D / E) x 100) / SA%
where S
= total number of on-effort sightings
D = total number of dolphins from on-effort
sightings
E = total number of units of survey effort
SA% = percentage of sea area
Table 3.4 Dolphin
Encounter Rates (Sightings Per 100 km of Survey Effort) During there Reporting
Period (Dec 2012 ¡V Feb 2013)
Survey Area |
Dolphin Monitoring |
Encounter rate (STG) |
Encounter rate (ANI) |
Primary Lines Only |
Primary Lines Only |
||
Northeast Lantau |
Set 1 |
5.42 |
10.84 |
Set 2 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Set 3 |
2.65 |
2.65 |
|
Set 4 |
8.24 |
21.98 |
|
Set 5 |
2.54 |
2.54 |
|
Set 6 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
|
Northwest Lantau |
Set 1 |
5.60 |
21.01 |
Set 2 |
13.73 |
60.78 |
|
Set 3 |
5.57 |
43.14 |
|
Set 4 |
3.08 |
12.33 |
|
Set 5 |
15.54 |
63.56 |
|
Set 6 |
6.62 |
14.57 |
Table
3.5 Comparison
of Average Dolphin Encounter Rates between Reporting Period (Dec 2012 ¡V Feb
2013) and Baseline Monitoring Period (Sep¡V Nov 2011) (Note: the encounter rates
deduced from the baseline monitoring period have been recalculated based only
on the survey effort and on-effort sighting data made along the primary
transect lines under favourable conditions)
Survey Area |
Encounter rate (STG) |
Encounter rate (ANI) |
||
Reporting Period |
Baseline Monitoring Period |
Reporting Period |
Baseline Monitoring Period |
|
Northeast
Lantau |
3.14 ¡Ó 3.21 |
6.00 ¡Ó 5.05 |
6.33 ¡Ó 8.64 |
22.19 ¡Ó 26.81 |
Northwest
Lantau |
8.36 ¡Ó 5.03 |
9.85 ¡Ó 5.85 |
35.90 ¡Ó 23.10 |
44.66 ¡Ó 29.85 |
Table
3.6 Comparison
of Average Dolphin Group Sizes between Reporting Period (Dec 2012 to Feb 2013)
and Baseline Monitoring Period (Sep¡V Nov 2011)
|
Average Dolphin Group Size |
|
Reporting Period |
Baseline Monitoring Period |
|
Overall |
3.90 ¡Ó 3.53 (n = 48) |
3.72 ¡Ó 3.13 (n = 66) |
Northeast Lantau |
2.63 ¡Ó 2.13 (n = 8) |
3.18 ¡Ó 2.16 (n = 17) |
Northwest Lantau |
4.15 ¡Ó 3.71 (n = 40) |
3.92 ¡Ó 3.40 (n = 49) |
Table 3.6 Measured Mudflat Surface Level Results
Baseline Monitoring |
Impact Monitoring |
|||||
Monitoring Station |
Easting (m) |
Northing (m) |
Surface Level |
Easting (m) |
Northing (m) |
Surface Level |
(mPD) |
(mPD) |
|||||
S1 |
810291.160 |
816678.727 |
0.950 |
810291.1 |
816678.9 |
1.039 |
S2 |
810958.272 |
815831.531 |
0.864 |
810958.4 |
815831.7 |
0.887 |
S3 |
810716.585 |
815953.308 |
1.341 |
810716.7 |
815953.4 |
1.390 |
S4 |
811221.433 |
816151.381 |
0.931 |
811221.4 |
816151.3 |
0.974 |
Table 3.7 Comparison
of measurement
Comparison of measurement |
Remarks and Recommendation |
|||
Monitoring Station |
Easting (m) |
Northing (m) |
Surface Level |
|
S1 |
-0.030 |
0.215 |
0.089 |
Larger than tolerance, need attention in
the next survey |
S2 |
0.166 |
0.164 |
0.023 |
Within tolerance, no significant change |
S3 |
0.091 |
0.073 |
0.049 |
Within tolerance, no significant change |
S4 |
-0.047 |
-0.042 |
0.043 |
Within tolerance, no significant change |
Table 3.8 Impact
Water Quality Monitoring Results (Depth Average)
Date |
Mid Ebb Tide |
Mid Flood Tide |
||||
DO (mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS (mg/L) |
DO (mg/L) |
Turbidity
(NTU) |
SS (mg/L) |
|
01-Dec-12 |
6.7 |
14.3 |
14.3 |
6.6 |
12.5 |
12.5 |
03-Dec-12 |
6.7 |
12.7 |
9.1 |
6.7 |
13.4 |
11.9 |
05-Dec-12 |
6.9 |
11.4 |
9.6 |
6.8 |
11.0 |
7.9 |
08-Dec-12 |
6.7 |
10.1 |
5.5 |
7.0 |
11.7 |
11.0 |
10-Dec-12 |
7.0 |
11.8 |
7.9 |
7.1 |
10.6 |
9.8 |
12-Dec-12 |
7.2 |
14.5 |
10.7 |
7.1 |
9.3 |
10.0 |
14-Dec-12 |
7.3 |
13.9 |
14.9 |
7.1 |
10.2 |
10.3 |
17-Dec-12 |
7.1 |
7.7 |
10.7 |
7.0 |
10.3 |
12.5 |
19-Dec-12 |
7.3 |
6.7 |
9.5 |
7.3 |
9.7 |
15.2 |
21-Dec-12 |
7.5 |
5.0 |
10.3 |
7.4 |
9.8 |
18.8 |
24-Dec-12 |
7.7 |
3.0 |
4.1 |
7.9 |
2.4 |
5.9 |
26-Dec-12 |
7.5 |
3.9 |
8.1 |
7.5 |
5.5 |
8.8 |
28-Dec-12 |
7.5 |
5.8 |
5.7 |
7.5 |
4.6 |
6.0 |
31-Dec-12 |
8.2 |
5.0 |
15.1 |
7.9 |
4.4 |
8.2 |
Average |
7.2 |
9.0 |
9.7 |
7.2 |
9.0 |
10.6 |
H¡¦= -£U ( Ni / N ) ln (
Ni / N ) (Shannon and Weaver, 1963)
J = H¡¦ / ln S, (Pielou, 1966)
where S is the total number of species in the sample, N is the total number of individuals, and Ni is the number of individuals of the ith species.
Table 3.9 Summary
of Prosomal Width of Horseshoe Crab Survey
TC1 |
TC2 |
TC3 |
ST |
|
Search duration (hr) |
2.5 |
|||
Tachypleus
tridentatus |
||||
No. of individuals |
12 |
|||
Mean prosomal width (mm) |
17.31 |
|||
Range of prosomal width
(mm) |
N.A. |
N.A. |
N.A. |
12.20 - 22.69 |
Search record |
2.40 |
|||
Carcinoscorpius
rotundicauda |
||||
No. of individuals |
4 |
|||
Mean prosomal width (mm) |
18.79 |
|||
Range of prosomal width
(mm) |
11.42 - 26.79 |
|||
Search record |
0.80 |
Table 4.1 Summary of
Water Quality Exceedances
Station |
Exceedance
Level |
DO (S&M) |
DO (Bottom) |
Turbidity |
SS |
Total Number
of Exceedances |
|||||||||||||||||||
Ebb |
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
Ebb |
Flood |
||||||||||||||||
IS5 |
Action Level |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2012-12-01 2012-12-08 2012-12-10 2013-01-04 2013-02-15 |
2013-01-04 |
2013-02-22 |
2013-02-13 |
6 |
2 |
||||||||||||||
Limit Level |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2012-12-03 2012-12-12 2012-12-24 2013-01-07 2013-01-11 2013-01-16 2013-01-18 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-25 2013-01-28
|
2012-12-08 2012-12-10 2012-12-19 2012-12-21 2012-12-24 2013-01-09 2013-01-11 2013-01-18 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-25
|
2012-12-01 2012-12-03 2012-12-08 2012-12-10 2012-12-12 2012-12-14 2012-12-19 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-28 2013-01-30 |
2012-12-03 2012-12-08 2012-12-10 2012-12-17 2012-12-19 2012-12-21 2012-12-24 2012-12-31 2013-01-02 2013-01-04 2013-01-07 2013-01-18 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-30 2013-02-01 2013-02-04 2013-02-08 2013-02-18 2013-02-20 2013-02-22 2013-02-25 |
28 |
40 |
|||||||||||||||
IS(Mf)6 |
Action Level |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2012-12-08 2013-01-09 2013-02-13 |
2013-01-04 2013-02-13 2013-02-20 |
-- |
2012-12-28 2013-01-25 2013-02-06 2013-02-18 |
3 |
7 |
||||||||||||||
Limit Level |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2012-12-01 2012-12-03 2012-12-10 2012-12-12 2012-12-14 2012-12-17 2012-12-19 2012-12-21 2012-12-24 2012-12-28 2013-01-04 2013-01-07 2013-01-11 2013-01-14 2013-01-16 2013-01-18 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-25 2013-01-28
2013-02-15 2013-02-18 2013-02-22 2013-02-25 2013-02-27 |
2012-12-01 2012-12-05 2012-12-08 2012-12-10 2012-12-14 2012-12-19 2012-12-21 2012-12-24 2013-01-07 2013-01-09 2013-01-11 2013-01-14 2013-01-18 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-25 2013-01-30
2013-02-18 2013-02-22 2013-02-25 |
2012-12-01 2012-12-03 2012-12-08 2012-12-10 2012-12-12 2012-12-14 2012-12-17 2012-12-19 2012-12-21 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-25 2013-01-28 2013-01-30
2013-02-18 2013-02-20 2013-02-22 2013-02-25 2013-02-27 |
2012-12-01 2012-12-05 2012-12-08 2012-12-10 2012-12-14 2012-12-17 2012-12-19 2012-12-21 2012-12-24 2012-12-31 2013-01-04 2013-01-07 2013-01-09 2013-01-11 2013-01-18 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-28 2013-01-30
2013-02-08 2013-02-20 2013-02-22 2013-02-25 2013-02-27 |
52 |
51 |
|||||||||||||||
IS7 |
Action Level |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2012-12-01 2012-12-08 2012-12-14 2012-12-21 |
2012-12-01 2012-12-14 2012-12-26 |
2012-12-01 2013-02-22 |
2012-12-10 2012-12-14 2013-01-02 2013-02-11 |
6 |
7 |
||||||||||||||
Limit Level |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
2012-12-05 2012-12-10 2012-12-12 2012-12-17 2012-12-19 2012-12-24 2013-01-07 2013-01-09 2013-01-14 2013-01-16 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-25 2013-01-28
2013-02-15 2013-02-18 2013-02-20 2013-02-25 |
2012-12-03 2012-12-05 2012-12-08 2012-12-10 2012-12-19 2012-12-21 2012-12-24 2013-01-04 2013-01-07 2013-01-09 2013-01-11 2013-01-18 2013-01-21 2013-01-23 2013-01-25 2013-02-01
|