table
of Contents
1.1 Background
1.2 Scope of Report
1.3 Organization Structure
1.4 Summary of Construction Works
2.1 Air quality
2.2 Water Quality Monitoring
2.3 Dolphin Monitoring
2.4 EM&A Site Inspection
2.5 Waste Management Status
2.6 Environmental Licenses and
Permits
2.7 Implementation Status of
Environmental Mitigation Measures
2.8 Summary of Exceedances of the
Environmental Quality Performance Limit
2.9 Summary of Complaints,
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
3.1 Construction Activities for
the Coming Month
3.2 Key Issues for the Coming
Month
3.3 Monitoring Schedule for the
Coming Month
4 Conclusions
and recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
Appendix
A |
|
Appendix
B |
|
Appendix
C |
Environmental Mitigation
And Enhancement Measure Implementation Schedules (EMIS) |
Appendix
D |
|
Appendix
E |
|
Appendix
F |
|
Appendix
G |
|
Appendix
H |
|
Appendix
I |
|
Appendix
J |
|
Appendix
K |
|
Appendix
L |
|
Appendix
M |
Under Contract No. HY/2012/08,
Dragages ¡V Bouygues Joint Venture (DBJV) is
commissioned by the Highways Department (HyD) to undertake
the design and construction of the Northern Connection Sub-sea Tunnel Section
of the Tuen Mun ¡V Chek Lap Kok Link Project (TM-CLK
Link Project) while AECOM Asia Company Limited was appointed by HyD as the Supervising Officer. For implementation of the environmental
monitoring and audit (EM&A) programme under the
Contract, ERM-Hong Kong, Limited (ERM) has been appointed as the Environmental
Team (ET) in accordance with Environmental
Permit No. EP-354/2009/A. ENVIRON Hong Kong Ltd. was employed by HyD as the Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) and
Environmental Project Office (ENPO).
Subsequent applications for variation of environmental
permits (VEP), EP-354/2009/B and EP-354/2009/C, were granted on 28
January 2014 and 10 December 2014, respectively.
The
construction phase of the Project commenced on 1 November 2013 and will
tentatively be completed by the end of 2018. The impact monitoring of the EM&A programme, including air quality, water quality, marine
ecological monitoring and environmental site inspections, were commenced on 1
November 2013.
This
is the Fifteenth Monthly EM&A report presenting the EM&A works carried
out during the period from 1 to 31 January 2015 for the Contract No. HY/2012/08 Northern
Connection Sub-sea Tunnel Section (the ¡§Project¡¨) in
accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual of the TM-CLK
Link Project. As informed by the
Contractor, major activities in the reporting period included:
Marine-based
Works
¡P
Rock Bund Deposition for Marine Sheetpile
Remedial Works at Works Area ¡V Portion N-A.
Land-based
Works
¡P
Diaphragm Wall Construction at Works Area ¡V Portion
N-C;
¡P
TBM Platform Construction at Works Area ¡V Portion N-A;
¡P
Formwork and Metal Scaffolding works at North
Launching Shaft at Works Area ¡V Portion N-A and,
¡P
Set up of Slurry Treatment Plant at Works Area ¡V
Portion N-C.
A summary of
monitoring and audit activities conducted in the reporting period is listed
below:
24-hour TSP
Monitoring 11
sessions
1-hour TSP
Monitoring 11
sessions
Impact Water
Quality Monitoring 13
sessions
Impact Dolphin
Monitoring 2
sessions
Joint
Environmental Site Inspection 4
sessions
Implementation of Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone
There was no dredging or marine sheet piling
works in open waters during this reporting period. Rock bund deposition for marine sheet
pile remedial works commenced on 5 January 2015 during day time. Thus, the day-time monitoring of Dolphin
Exclusion Zone (DEZ) by dolphin observers was in effect throughout the period
of remedial works, in which no sighting of the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin Sousa chinensis
(i.e. Chinese White Dolphin) was recorded during the exclusion zone monitoring
in the reporting month.
Summary of
Breaches of Action/Limit Levels
Breaches of Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality
No Action
Level or Limit Level of air quality exceedances were recorded in the water
quality monitoring of this reporting month.
Breaches of Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality
No Action
Level or Limit Level of water quality exceedances were recorded in the water
quality monitoring of this reporting month.
Environmental
Complaints, Non-compliance & Summons
No
non-compliance with EIA recommendations, EP conditions and other requirements associated with
the construction of this Contract was recorded in this reporting period.
No
environmental complaint was received in this reporting period.
No
environmental summons was received in this reporting period.
Reporting
Change
There was no
reporting change required in the reporting period.
Upcoming Works for the Next Reporting Month
Works to be
undertaken in the next monitoring period of February 2015 include the
following:
Land-based
Works
¡P
Diaphragm Wall Construction at Works Area ¡V Portion
N-C;
¡P
TBM Platform Construction at Works Area ¡V Portion N-A;
¡P
Formwork and Metal Scaffolding works at North
Launching Shaft at Works Area ¡V Portion N-A and,
¡P
Set up of Slurry Treatment Plant at Works Area ¡V
Portion N-C.
Marine-based
Works
¡P
Rock bund deposition for marine sheet pile remedial
works at Marine Works Area ¡V Portion N-A.
Future Key
Issues
Potential
environmental impacts arising from the above upcoming construction activities
in the next reporting month of February 2015 are expected to be mainly associated
with dust, marine water quality, marine ecology and waste management.
According to
the findings of the Northwest New Territories (NWNT) Traffic and Infrastructure
Review conducted by the Transport Department, Tuen Mun Road, Ting Kau Bridge, Lantau
Link and North Lantau Highway would be operating beyond capacity after
2016. This forecast has been based
on the estimated increase in cross boundary traffic, developments in the
Northwest New Territories (NWNT), and possible developments in North Lantau,
including the Airport developments, the Lantau Logistics Park (LLP) and the
Hong Kong ¡V Zhuhai ¡V Macao Bridge (HZMB).
In order to cope with the anticipated traffic demand, two new road sections
between NWNT and North Lantau ¡V Tuen Mun ¡V Chek Lap Kok Link (TM-CLKL) and Tuen Mun Western Bypass (TMWB) are proposed.
An
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of TM-CLKL (the Project) was prepared in
accordance with the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-175/2007) and
the Technical Memorandum of the
Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM). The
EIA Report was submitted under the Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance
(EIAO) in August 2009. Subsequent
to the approval of the EIA Report (EIAO Register Number AEIAR-146/2009), an
Environmental Permit (EP-354/2009) for TM-CLKL was granted by the Director of
Environmental Protection (DEP) on 4 November 2009, and EP variation (VEP)
(EP-354/2009A) was issued on 8 December 2010. Subsequent applications for variation of
environmental permits (VEPs), EP-354/2009/B
and EP-354/2009/C, were granted on 28 January 2014 and 10 December 2014,
respectively.
Under
Contract No. HY/2012/08,
Dragages ¡V Bouygues Joint Venture (DBJV) is
commissioned by the Highways Department (HyD) to
undertake the design and construction of the Northern Connection Sub-sea Tunnel
Section of TM-CLKL while AECOM Asia Company Limited was appointed by HyD as the Supervising Officer. For implementation of the environmental
monitoring and audit (EM&A) programme under the
Contract, ERM-Hong Kong, Limited (ERM) has been appointed as the Environmental
Team (ET). ENVIRON Hong Kong
Ltd. was employed by HyD as the Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) and Environmental Project Office (ENPO).
Layout of the
Contract components is presented in Figure 1.1.
The
organization structure of the Contract is shown in Appendix A. The key personnel contact names and
contact details are summarized in Table
1.1 below.
Table 1.1 Contact
Information of Key Personnel
Party |
Position |
Name |
Telephone |
Fax |
Highways
Department |
Engr
16/HZMB |
Kenneth Lee |
2762
4996 |
3188
6614 |
SOR (AECOM Asia
Company Limited) |
Chief
Resident Engineer |
Edwin
Ching Andrew
Westmoreland |
2293
6388 2293
6360 |
2293
6300 2293
6300 |
ENPO / IEC (ENVIRON
Hong Kong Ltd.) |
ENPO Leader |
Y.H. Hui |
3465 2888 |
3465 2899 |
IEC |
Dr. F.C.
Tsang |
3465 2828 |
3465 2899 |
|
Contractor (Dragages ¡V
Bouygues Joint Venture) |
Environmental
Manager |
C.F. Kwong |
2293
7322 |
2670
2798 |
Environmental
Officer 24-hour
complaint hotline |
Bryan Lee Rachel Lam |
2293
7323 2293
7342 |
2670
2798 |
|
ET (ERM-HK) |
ET Leader |
Jovy Tam |
2271 3113 |
2723 5660 |
Table 1.2 Summary
of Construction Activities Undertaken during the Reporting Period
Construction Activities Undertaken |
Marine-based Works |
¡P
Rock Bund Deposition for Marine Sheetpile
Remedial Works at Works Area ¡V Portion N-A. |
Land-based Works |
¡P
Diaphragm Wall Construction at Works Area ¡V Portion
N-C; ¡P
TBM Platform Construction at Works Area ¡V Portion
N-A; ¡P
Formwork and Metal Scaffolding works at North
Launching Shaft at Works Area ¡V Portion N-A; ¡P
Set up of Slurry Treatment Plant at Works Area ¡V
Portion N-C. |
Figure 1.2 Locations
of Construction Activities ¡VJanuary 2015
|
The EM&A programme required environmental monitoring for air
quality, water quality and marine ecology as well as environmental site
inspections for air quality, noise, water quality, waste management, marine
ecology and landscape and visual impacts.
The EM&A requirements and related findings for each component are
summarized in the following sections
In accordance
with the Updated EM&A Manual and the Enhanced TSP Monitoring Plan, impact
1-hour TSP monitoring was conducted three (3) times every six (6) days and
impact 24-hour TSP monitoring was carried out once every six (6) days when the
highest dust impact was expected.
1-hr and 24-hr TSP monitoring frequency was increased to three times per
day every three days and daily every three days, respectively, as excavation
works for launching shaft commenced on 24 October 2014.
High volume
samplers (HVSs) were used to carry out the 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring on
1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28 and 31 January 2015 at the five (5) air
quality monitoring stations in accordance with the requirements stipulated in
the Updated EM&A Manual (Figure 2.1; Table 2.1). Wind meter was installed at the rooftop
of ASR5 for logging wind speed and wind direction. Details of the equipment deployed are
provided in Table 2.2. Copies of the calibration certificates
for the equipment are presented in Appendix E.
Table 2.1 Locations
of Impact Air Quality Monitoring Stations and Monitoring Dates in this
Reporting Period
Monitoring
Station |
Monitoring
Dates |
Location |
Description |
Parameters & Frequency |
ASR1 |
1,
4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, 28 and 31 January 2015 |
Tuen Mun Fireboat Station |
Office |
TSP monitoring
1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (1-hour
TSP, µg/m3), 3 times in every 6 days
24-hour Total Suspended Particulates
(24-hour TSP, µg/m3), daily for 24-hour in every 6 days Enhanced TSP monitoring (commenced on 24 October 2014)
1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (1-hour
TSP, µg/m3), 3 times in every 3 days
24-hour Total Suspended Particulates
(24-hour TSP, µg/m3), daily for 24-hour in every 3 days |
ASR5 |
|
Pillar
Point Fire Station |
Office |
|
AQMS1 |
|
Previous
River Trade Golf |
Bare
ground |
|
ASR6 |
|
Butterfly
Beach Laundry |
Office |
|
ASR10 |
|
Butterfly
Beach Park |
Recreational
uses |
Table 2.2 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Brand and Model |
High Volume Sampler |
Tisch Environmental Mass Flow Controlled Total Suspended Particulate (TSP) High
Volume Sampler (Model No. TE-5170) |
Wind Meter |
Davis (Model: Weather Wizard III (S/N: WE90911A30) |
Wind Anemometer for calibration |
Lutron (Model No. AM-4201) |
The Action and
Limit Levels of the air quality monitoring is provided in Appendix D. The Event and Action plan is presented
in Appendix K.
The schedule
for air quality monitoring in January 2015 is provided in Appendix F.
The monitoring
results for 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP are summarized in Tables 2.3 and 2.4,
respectively. Detailed impact air
quality monitoring results and graphical presentations are presented in Appendix G.
Table 2.3 Summary
of 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results in this Reporting Period
Station |
Average (µg/m3) |
Range (µg/m3) |
Action Level (µg/m3) |
Limit Level (µg/m3) |
ASR1 |
193 |
53
¡V 307 |
331 |
500 |
ASR5 |
200 |
99
¡V 314 |
340 |
500 |
AQMS1 |
165 |
56
¡V 243 |
335 |
500 |
ASR6 |
159 |
53
¡V 276 |
338 |
500 |
ASR10 |
109 |
63
¡V 251 |
337 |
500 |
Table 2.4 Summary
of 24-hour TSP Monitoring Results in this Reporting Period
Station |
Average (µg/m3) |
Range (µg/m3) |
Action Level (µg/m3) |
Limit Level (µg/m3) |
ASR1 |
107 |
64
¡V 151 |
213 |
260 |
ASR5 |
105 |
76
¡V 148 |
238 |
260 |
AQMS1 |
94 |
58
¡V 118 |
213 |
260 |
ASR6 |
86 |
61
¡V 108 |
238 |
260 |
ASR10 |
75 |
52
¡V 101 |
214 |
260 |
The weather
condition during the monitoring period varied from sunny to cloudy. The major dust sources in the reporting
period include construction activities under the Contract as well as nearby
traffic emissions.
A total of
eleven monitoring events were undertaken in which no Action or Limit Level
exceedances of 1-hr TSP were recorded in this reporting month. No Action or Limit Level
exceedances for 24-hr TSP were record.
Meteorological information collected at the ASR5,
including wind speed and wind direction, is provided in Appendix H.[JY1]
In accordance
with the Updated EM&A Manual, impact water quality monitoring was carried out
three days per week during the construction period at nine (9) water quality
monitoring stations (Figure 2.2; Table 2.5).
Table 2.5 Locations
of Water Quality Monitoring Stations and the Corresponding Monitoring
Requirements
Station ID |
Type |
Coordinates |
*Parameters, unit |
Depth |
Frequency |
|
|
|
Easting |
Northing |
|
|
|
IS12 |
Impact
Station |
813218 |
823681 |
Temperature(¢XC)
pH(pH unit)
Turbidity (NTU)
Water depth (m)
Salinity (ppt)
DO (mg/L and % of saturation) ¡P
SS (mg/L) |
3 water depths: 1m below sea surface, mid-depth and 1m above sea bed. If the water
depth is less than 3m, mid-depth sampling only. If water depth less than 6m, mid-depth
may be omitted. |
Impact monitoring: 3 days per week, at mid-flood
and mid-ebb tides during the construction period of the Contract. |
IS13 |
Impact Station |
813667 |
824325 |
|||
IS14 |
Impact Station |
812592 |
824172 |
|||
IS15 |
Impact Station |
813356 |
825008 |
|||
CS4 |
Control /
Far Field Station |
810025 |
824004 |
|||
CS6 |
Control /
Far Field Station |
817028 |
823992 |
|||
SR8 |
Sensitive
receiver (Gazettal beaches in Tuen Mun) |
816306 |
825715 |
|||
SR9 |
Sensitive
receiver |
813601 |
825858 |
|||
SR10A |
Sensitive
receiver |
823741 |
823495 |
|||
*Notes: In addition to the parameters presented monitoring location/position, time,
water depth, sampling depth, tidal stages, weather conditions and any special
phenomena or works underway nearby were also recorded. |
Table 2.6 summarizes the equipment used in the impact water
quality monitoring programme. Copies
of the calibration certificates are attached in Appendix E.
Table 2.6 Water
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Water Sampler |
Kahlsico Water-Bottle Model 135DW 150 |
Dissolved Oxygen Meter |
YSI Pro 2030 |
pH Meter |
HANNA HI 8314 |
Turbidity Meter |
HACH 2100Q |
Monitoring Position Equipment |
¡§Magellan¡¨ Handheld GPS Model explorist GC |
DGPS Koden KGP913MK2 (1) |
The Action and Limit levels of water quality impact
monitoring are shown in Appendix D. The Event and Action plan is presented
in Appendix K.
The schedule for
water quality monitoring in January 2015 is provided in Appendix F.
During this
reporting period, only minor marine works included rock bund deposition for
marine sheetpile remedial works was carried out at
Portion N-A. It is useful to note
that heavy marine traffic (not associated with the Project) was commonly
observed nearby the Project site and its vicinity.
Impact water
quality monitoring was conducted at all designated monitoring stations in the
reporting month. Results and
graphical presentations of impact water quality monitoring are presented in Appendix I.
In this
reporting period, a total of thirteen monitoring events were undertaken in
which no Action Level or Limit Levels of exceedances for impact water quality
monitoring was recorded.
Impact dolphin
monitoring is required to be conducted by a qualified dolphin specialist team
to evaluate whether there have been any effects on the dolphins. In order to fulfil the EM&A requirements
and make good use of available resources, the on-going impact line transect
dolphin monitoring data collected by HyD¡¦s Contract No. HY/2011/03 Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge. Hong
Kong Link Road - Section between Scenic Hill and Hong Kong Boundary Crossing
Facilities on the monthly basis is adopted to avoid duplicates of survey
effort.
Table 2.7 summarises the equipment
used for the impact dolphin monitoring.
Table 2.7 Dolphin
Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Global Positioning
System (GPS) |
Garmin 18X-PC Geo One Phottix |
Camera |
Nikon D90 300m 2.8D fixed focus Nikon D90 20-300m zoom lens |
Laser Binocular |
Infinitor LRF 1000 |
Marine Binocular |
Bushell 7 x 50 marine binocular with compass and
reticules |
Vessel for Monitoring |
65 foot single
engine motor vessel with viewing platform 4.5m above water level |
Dolphin monitoring
should cover all transect lines in Northeast Lantau (NEL) and the Northwest
Lantau (NWL) survey areas twice per month throughout the entire construction
period. The monitoring data should
be compatible with, and should be made available for, long-term studies of
small cetacean ecology in Hong Kong.
In order to provide a suitable long-term dataset for comparison,
identical methodology and line transects employed in baseline dolphin
monitoring was followed in the impact dolphin monitoring.
The impact
dolphin monitoring was carried out in the NEL and NWL along the line transect
as depicted in Figure 2.3. The co-ordinates of all transect lines
are shown in Table 2.8 below.
Table 2.8 Impact
Dolphin Monitoring Line Transect Co-ordinates
Line No. |
Easting |
Northing |
Line No. |
Easting |
Northing |
||
1 |
Start Point |
804671 |
814577 |
13 |
Start Point |
816506 |
819480 |
1 |
End Point |
804671 |
831404 |
13 |
End Point |
816506 |
824859 |
2 |
Start Point |
805475 |
815457 |
14 |
Start Point |
817537 |
820220 |
2 |
End Point |
805477 |
826654 |
14 |
End Point |
817537 |
824613 |
3 |
Start Point |
806464 |
819435 |
15 |
Start Point |
818568 |
820735 |
3 |
End Point |
806464 |
822911 |
15 |
End Point |
818568 |
824433 |
4 |
Start Point |
807518 |
819771 |
16 |
Start Point |
819532 |
821420 |
4 |
End Point |
807518 |
829230 |
16 |
End Point |
819532 |
824209 |
5 |
Start Point |
808504 |
820220 |
17 |
Start Point |
820451 |
822125 |
5 |
End Point |
808504 |
828602 |
17 |
End Point |
820451 |
823671 |
6 |
Start Point |
809490 |
820466 |
18 |
Start Point |
821504 |
822371 |
6 |
End Point |
809490 |
825352 |
18 |
End Point |
821504 |
823761 |
7 |
Start Point |
810499 |
820690 |
19 |
Start Point |
822513 |
823268 |
7 |
End Point |
810499 |
824613 |
19 |
End Point |
822513 |
824321 |
8 |
Start Point |
811508 |
820847 |
20 |
Start Point |
823477 |
823402 |
8 |
End Point |
811508 |
824254 |
20 |
End Point |
823477 |
824613 |
9 |
Start Point |
812516 |
820892 |
21 |
Start Point |
805476 |
827081 |
9 |
End Point |
812516 |
824254 |
21 |
End Point |
805476 |
830562 |
10 |
Start Point |
813525 |
820872 |
22 |
Start Point |
806464 |
824033 |
10 |
End Point |
813525 |
824657 |
22 |
End Point |
806464 |
829598 |
11 |
Start Point |
814556 |
818449 |
23 |
Start Point |
814559 |
821739 |
11 |
End Point |
814556 |
820992 |
23 |
End Point |
814559 |
824768 |
12 |
Start Point |
815542 |
818807 |
|
|
|
|
12 |
End Point |
815542 |
824882 |
|
|
|
|
The Action and
Limit levels of impact dolphin monitoring are shown in Appendix D. The Event and Action plan is presented
in Appendix K.
Dolphin monitoring
was carried out on 8, 15, 27 and 29 January 2015. The dolphin monitoring schedule for the
reporting month is shown in Appendix F.
A total of
294.39 km of survey effort was collected, with 98.7% of the total survey effort
being conducted under favourable weather conditions (ie Beaufort Sea State 3 or below with good visibility) in
January 2015. Amongst the two
areas, 116.20 km and 178.19 km of survey effort were collected from NEL and NWL
survey areas, respectively. The total
survey effort conducted on primary and secondary lines were 214.00 km and 80.39
km, respectively. The survey
efforts are summarized in Appendix J.
A total of 11 groups of 46 Chinese
White Dolphin sightings were recorded
during the two sets
of surveys in January 2015. All
sighting were made in NWL during the two sets of surveys in January 2015, while
no dolphin was sighted in NEL.
Eight of the eleven sightings were made on primary lines during
on-effort search, and none of the dolphin groups was associated with operating
fishing vessel.
None of the sightings was made in the vicinity of
the TM-CLKL Northern Connection Sub-sea Tunnel Section. The distribution of dolphin sightings
during the reporting month is shown in Figure 2.4.
Encounter
rates of Chinese White Dolphins are deduced from the survey effort and
on-effort sighting data made under favourable
conditions (Beaufort 3 or below with good visibility) in January 2015 with the
results present in Tables 2.9 and 2.10.
Table 2.9 Individual
Survey Event Encounter Rates
|
Encounter rate (STG) (no. of on-effort dolphin sightings per 100 km of survey effort) |
Encounter rate (ANI)
(no. of dolphins from all on-effort sightings per
100 km of survey effort) |
|
Primary Lines Only |
Primary Lines Only |
||
NEL |
Set 1: January 8th/15th |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Set 2: January 27th/29th |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
NWL |
Set 1: January 8th/15th |
4.3 |
21.6 |
Set 2: January 27th/29th |
7.5 |
37.6 |
Note:
Dolphin Encounter Rates
are deduced from the Two Sets of Surveys (Two Surveys in Each Set) in January
2015 in Northeast (NEL) and Northwest Lantau (NWL)
Table 2.10 Monthly
Average Encounter Rates
|
Encounter rate (STG)
(no. of on-effort dolphin sightings per
100 km of survey effort) |
Encounter rate (ANI)
(no. of dolphins from all on-effort sightings per 100 km of survey
effort) |
||
Primary Lines Only |
Both Primary and Secondary Lines |
Primary Lines Only |
Both Primary and Secondary Lines |
|
Northeast Lantau |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Northwest Lantau |
5.9 |
6.3 |
29.4 |
26.4 |
Note: Overall dolphin encounter rates (sightings per 100
km of survey effort) from all four surveys are conducted in January 2015 on
primary lines only as well as both primary lines and secondary lines in
Northeast and Northwest Lantau.
The average
group size of Chinese White Dolphins in January 2015 was 4.18 individuals per
group. Five of the eleven dolphin
groups were composed of 5-8 animals.
Due to monthly
variation in dolphin occurrence within the survey area, it would be more appropriate
to draw conclusion on whether any unacceptable impacts on dolphins have been
detected related to the construction activities of this Project in the
quarterly EM&A reports, where comparison on distribution, group size and
encounter rates of dolphins between the quarterly impact monitoring period and
baseline monitoring period will be made.
There was no dredging or marine sheet piling
works in open waters during this reporting period. Rock bund deposition for marine sheetpile remedial works commenced on 5 January 2015
during day time. Thus, the day-time
monitoring of Dolphin Exclusion Zone (DEZ) by dolphin observers was in effect
throughout the period of marine sheetpile remedial
works, in which no sighting of the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin Sousa chinensis
(i.e. Chinese White Dolphin) was recorded during the exclusion zone monitoring
in the reporting month.
Site
inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the implementation of
proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures under the
Contract. In the reporting month,
four (4) site inspections were carried out on 7, 14, 21 and 28 January 2015.
Key observations
and recommendations during the site inspections in this reporting period are
summarized in Table 2.11.
Table 2.11 Specific
Observations and Recommendations during the Weekly Site Inspection in this
Reporting Month
Inspection Date |
Observations |
Recommendations/ Remarks |
7 January
2015 |
Works
Area - Portion N-A Oil
drum without drip tray was observed. Chemical
container should be removed and place in chemical storage area. Works
Area - Portion N-C Oil
drum without drip tray was observed. |
Works
Area - Portion N-A The
Contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for the oil drum. The
Contractor was reminded to place the chemical container in chemical storage
area. Works
Area - Portion N-C The
Contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for the oil drum. |
14
January 2015 |
Works Area - Portion N-A
Excess muddy water was observed.
General refuse was observed on the ground.
Chemical containers should be removed and place in chemical storage
area. |
Works Area - Portion N-A
The Contractor was reminded to clear the excess muddy water.
The Contractor was reminded to clear the general refuse on the ground.
The Contractor was reminded to remove the chemical containers. |
21 January
2015 |
Works
Area - Portion N-A Cement
bags should be covered. Works
Area - Portion N-B Oil
drum without chemical labels was observed. Chemical
containers were observed on the ground. Works
Area - Portion N-C Excess
muddy water was observed. |
Works
Area - Portion N-A The
Contractor was reminded to fully cover the cement bags. Works
Area - Portion N-B The
Contractor was reminded to provide chemical labels for the oil drum. The
Contractor was reminded to remove the chemical containers. Works
Area - Portion N-C The
Contractor was reminded to clear the excess muddy water. |
28
January 2015 |
Works Area
- Portion N-A Water spraying
should be applied more frequently during windy condition. Works Area
- Portion N-B Excess
muddy water was observed. |
Works Area
- Portion N-A The
Contractor was reminded to apply water spraying more frequently during windy
condition. Works Area
- Portion N-B The
Contractor was reminded to clear the excess muddy water. |
The Contractor
has rectified all of the observations as identified during environmental site
inspections in the reporting month.
The Contractor
had submitted application form for registration as chemical waste producer
under the Contract. Sufficient
numbers of receptacles were available for general refuse collection and
sorting.
Wastes
generated during this reporting period include mainly construction wastes
(inert and non-inert). Reference
has been made to the waste flow table prepared by the Contractor (Appendix M).
The quantities of different types of wastes are summarized in Table 2.12.
Table 2.12 Quantities
of Different Waste Generated in the Reporting Month
Month/Year |
Inert Construction Waste (a)
(tonnes) |
Imported Fill (tonnes) |
Inert Construction Waste
Re-used (tonnes) |
Non-inert Construction Waste (b)
(tonnes) |
Recyclable Materials (c) (kg) |
Chemical Wastes (kg) |
Marine Sediment (m3) |
|
Category L |
Category M (Mp
& Mf) |
|||||||
January 2015 |
30,877 |
0 |
0 |
80 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Notes: |
||||||||
(a) Inert
construction wastes include hard rock and large broken concrete, and
materials disposed as public fill. (b) Non-inert
construction wastes include general refuse disposed at landfill. (c) Recyclable
materials include metals, paper, cardboard, plastics, timber and others. |
The Contractor
was advised to properly maintain on site C&D materials and waste
collection, sorting and recording system, dispose of C&D materials and
wastes at designated ground and maximize reuse/ recycle of C&D materials
and wastes. The Contractor was also
reminded to properly maintain the site tidiness and dispose of the wastes
accumulated on site regularly and properly.
For chemical
waste containers, the Contractor was reminded to treat properly and store
temporarily in designated chemical waste storage area on site in accordance
with the Code of Practice on the Packaging, Labelling and Storage of Chemical
Wastes.
The status of
environmental licensing and permit is summarized in Table 2.13 below.
Table 2.13 Summary
of Environmental Licensing and Permit Status
License/
Permit |
License
or Permit No. |
Date
of Issue |
Date
of Expiry |
License/
Permit Holder |
Remarks |
Environmental Permit |
EP-354/2009/C |
28 January 2014 |
Throughout the Contract |
HyD |
Application for VEP on 10 December 2014 to replace EP-354/2009/B |
Construction Dust Notification |
363510 |
19 August 2013 |
Throughout the Contract |
DBJV |
- |
Chemical Waste Registration |
5213-422-D2516-01 |
10 September 2013 |
Throughout the Contract |
DBJV |
- |
Construction Waste Disposal Account |
7018108 |
19 August 2013 |
Throughout the Contract |
DBJV |
Waste disposal in Contract No. HY/2012/08 |
Waste Water Discharge License |
WT00017707-2013 |
18 November 2013 |
30 November 2018 |
DBJV |
For site WA18 |
Waste Water Discharge License |
WT00019248-2014 |
5 June 2014 |
30 June 2019 |
DBJV |
For site Portion N6 and Reclamation Area E |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0847-14 |
11 May 2014 |
10 May 2015 |
DBJV |
For site WA23 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0706-14 |
29 September 2014 |
28 March 2015 |
DBJV |
For Portion N6 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0550-14 |
25 July 2014 |
24 January 2015 |
DBJV |
For Dredging and Reclamation Works |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0970-14 |
17 December 2014 |
14 May 2015 |
DBJV |
For Dredging and Reclamation Works |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0674-14 |
18 September 2014 |
17 March 2015 |
DBJV |
For GI Works at Southern Landfall |
Marine Dumping Permit |
EP/MD/15-142 |
7 November 2014 |
31 January 2015 |
DBJV |
For Type 1 (Open Sea Disposal) |
Notes: |
|||||
HyD = Highways
Department DBJV = Dragages ¡V Bouygues
Joint Venture VEP = Variation of Environmental
Permit |
In response to
the site audit findings, the Contractors carried out all corrective actions.
A summary of the
Implementation Schedule of Environmental Mitigation Measures (EMIS) is
presented in Appendix C. The necessary mitigation measures
relevant to this Contract were implemented properly.
No Action
Level or Limit Level exceedances were recorded in the air quality monitoring of
this reporting month.
No Action
Level or Limit Level exceedances were recorded in the water quality monitoring
of this reporting month.
Cumulative
statistics are provided in Appendix L.
The
Environmental Complaint Handling Procedure is provided in Figure 2.5.
No
environmental complaint was received in the reporting period.
No
notification of summons and prosecution were received in the reporting period.
Statistics on
complaints, notifications of summons and successful prosecutions are summarized
in Appendix L.
As informed by
the Contractor, the major works for the Project in February 2015 are summarized
in Table 3.1.
Table
3.1 Construction
Works to Be Undertaken in the Coming Month
Works to be undertaken |
||
Land-based Works |
||
¡P
Diaphragm Wall Construction at Works Area ¡V Portion
N-C; ¡P
TBM Platform Construction at Works Area ¡V Portion
N-A; ¡P
Formwork and Metal Scaffolding works at North
Launching Shaft at Works Area ¡V Portion N-A and, ¡P
Set up of Slurry Treatment Plant at Works Area ¡V Portion
N-C.
|
Potential
environmental impacts arising from the above upcoming construction activities
in the next reporting month of February 2015 are mainly associated with dust,
marine water quality, marine ecology and waste management issues.
The tentative schedule
for environmental monitoring in February 2015 is provided in Appendix F.
This Fifteenth
Monthly EM&A Report presents the findings of the EM&A activities
undertaken during the period from 1 to 31 January 2015, in accordance with the
Updated EM&A Manual and the requirements of EP-354/2009/C.
Air quality
(including 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP), water quality and dolphin monitoring
were carried out in this reporting month. No Action Level or Limit Level exceedances
were recorded in the water quality monitoring of this reporting month. No Action
Level or Limit Level exceedances were recorded in the air quality monitoring of
this reporting month.
A total of
eleven (11) groups
of forty-six (46) Chinese White Dolphin sightings
were recorded during the two sets
of surveys in January 2015. All
sighting were made in NWL during the two sets of surveys in January 2015, while
no dolphin was sighted in NEL.
Eight of the eleven sightings were made on primary lines during
on-effort search, and none of the dolphin groups was associated with operating
fishing vessel. No unacceptable impact from the
construction activities of the TM-CLKL Northern Connection Sub-sea Tunnel
Section on Chinese White Dolphins was noticeable from general observations
during the dolphin monitoring in this reporting month.
Environmental
site inspection was carried out four (4) times in January 2015. Recommendations on remedial actions
recommended for the deficiencies identified during the site audits were
properly implemented by the Contractor.
No
non-compliance event was recorded during the reporting period.
No
environmental complaint was received during the reporting period.
No summons/
prosecution was received during the reporting period.
The ET will
keep track on the construction works to confirm compliance of environmental
requirements and the proper implementation of all necessary mitigation
measures.
[JY1]Wind data on 22 Jan 2015 is missing