|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||||
|
|
AUES Job No.: TCS00715/14 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
Tuen Mun - Chek Lap Kok Link Contract No. HY/2013/12 ¡V Northern Connection Toll Plaza and Associated Works |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
11th Quarterly
Environmental Monitoring & Audit Summary Report ¡V (May to July 2017) |
|
|
||
|
|
Prepared For |
|
|
||
|
|
CRBC
and Kaden Joint Venture |
|
|
||
Quality Index |
|||
Date |
Reference No. |
Prepared By |
Certified By |
30
October 2017 |
TCS00715/14/600/R0323v2 |
|
|
Ben Tam (Environmental Consultant) |
T.W. Tam (Environmental Team Leader) |
This report has been prepared by
Action-United Environmental Services & Consulting with all reasonable
skill, care and diligence within the terms of the Agreement with the client,
incorporating our General Terms and Conditions of Business and taking account
of the resources devoted to it by agreement with the client. We disclaim any
responsibility to the client and others in respect of any matters outside the
scope of the above. This report is confidential to the client and we accept
no responsibility of whatsoever nature to third parties to whom this report,
or any part thereof, is made known. Any such party relies upon the report at
their own risk. |
Executive
Summary
ES.01.
This is the 11th Quarterly EM&A Summary Report
for the ¡§Tuen Mun - Chek Lap Kok Link - Northern Connection Toll Plaza and Associated
Works¡¨ under
Environmental Permit No. EP-354/2009/D (hereinafter ¡¥¡¥the EP¡¦¡¦), covering the period from 1
May to 31 July 2017 (hereinafter ¡§Reporting Period¡¨).
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Activities
ES.02.
Environmental monitoring activities under the
EM&A programme in the Reporting Period are summarized
in the following table.
Environmental Aspect |
Environmental
Monitoring Parameters / Inspection |
Total Occasions |
Air Quality |
1-hour Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) |
450 |
24-hour TSP |
150 |
|
Cultural heritage inspection |
Grave G1 |
13 |
Landfill Gas Monitoring |
Oxygen; Methane & Carbon Dioxide |
75 days |
Landscape &Visual |
Landscape
&Visual Monitoring |
13 |
Joint Site Inspection / Audit |
IEC, ET, the Contractor and RE joint site Environmental Inspection and Auditing |
13 |
Breaches of Action/Limit levels
ES.03. In the
Reporting Period, 3 Action Level
exceedances of 1-hour TSP were recorded at ASR5, ASR6 & ASR10 on 29 July 2017 according to the measurement results by the ET of Contract
HY/2012/08, investigation report for the
exceedances is underway by the ET and it
will submit to all relevant parties.
The summary of breach of air quality performance is shown below.
Environmental
Aspect |
Monitoring Parameters |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Event & Action |
||
NOE Issued |
Investigation |
Corrective Actions |
||||
Air Quality |
1-hour TSP |
3 |
0 |
3 |
Exceedances were unlikely related to the Contract
work |
No corrective action was undertaken |
24-hour TSP |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Landfill Gas
Monitoring |
Oxygen |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Methane |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Carbon
Dioxide |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Environmental
Complaint
ES.04. In the
Reporting Period, no environmental complaint was
received.
Notification of Summons and
Successful Prosecutions
ES.05. No
environmental summons or successful prosecutions were recorded in the Reporting
Period.
Reporting Changes
ES.06. No
reporting changes were made in the Reporting Period.
Future key issues
ES.07. During wet season, muddy water or other water pollutants from
site surface runoff into the public areas will be key environment issue. Special attention should be paid on the
water quality mitigation measures to prevent surface runoff flow to public
area.
ES.08. Although in wet season, air quality mitigation measures such as watering
of site area for 12 times per day and covering of exposed slopes should be
fully implemented to reduce construction dust impact as recommended in the
EMIS.
ES.09. It was
reminded that good housekeeping practice should be maintained. Mosquito control measures should be
properly implemented to prevent mosquito breeding on site especially after
rain.
Table of Contents
2 Contract Organization and Construction
progress
2.3 Summary of Environmental Submissions
3 Summary of Impact monitoring
Requirements
3.6 Derivation of Action/Limit (A/L)
Levels
3.7 Other Environmental Aspects
4.2 Summary of Monitoring Results
4.3 Action and Limit (A/L) Levels
Exceedance
4.4 Air Quality Exceedance Investigation
7.2 Landscape and Visual Inspection
8 Landfill Gas Hazard Monitoring
8.2 Landfill Gas Monitoring Result
9.2 Records of Waste Quantities
11 Environmental Complaint and
Non-compliance
11.1 Environmental Complaint, Summons and
Prosecution
12 Implementation Status of Mitigation
Measures
13 Conclusions and Recommendations
List of tables
Table 2-1 Status of
Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Table 3-1 Air Quality
Monitoring Stations under the Contract
Table 3-2 Enhanced TSP
Monitoring Plan ¡V Construction Phase
Table 3-3 Action and Limit
Levels for Impact Air Quality Monitoring
Table 4-1 Summary of Air
Quality Monitoring Exceedance
Table 8-1 Summary of Landfill
Gas Monitoring Zone
Table 8-2 Summary of
Landfill Gas Measurement Results in Reporting Period
Table 9-1 Summary of
Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Table 9-2 Summary of
Quantities of C&D Wastes
Table 10-1 Site Observations for the Contract
for the Reporting Period
Table 10-2 Summary of Reminders/Observations
of Site Inspection
Table 11-1 Statistical Summary of
Environmental Exceedance
Table 11-2 Statistical Summary of
Environmental Complaints
Table 11-3 Statistical Summary of
Environmental Summons
Table 11-4 Statistical Summary of
Environmental Prosecution
Table 12-1 Environmental Mitigation
Measures
List of Annexes
Appendix
A Layout plan of the Project
Appendix
B Layout plan of the Contract
Appendix C Environmental Management Organization
Chart
Appendix D Construction Programme
Appendix E Monitoring Locations / Sensitive
Receivers for the Contract
Appendix F Event and Action Plan
Appendix G
Landfill Gas Monitoring Graphical Plots
Appendix H
Waste Flow Table
Appendix I
Implementation Schedule for Environmental Mitigation Measures
1.1.1. CRBC-Kaden
Joint Venture (hereafter ¡§CRBC-Kaden JV¡¨) is commissioned by the
Highways Department (HyD) as the Main Contractor of
the Contract No. HY/2013/12 ¡V Northern
Connection Toll Plaza and Tunnel Section ((hereafter ¡§the Contract¡¨) and this
Contract is part of the Tuen Mun
¡V Chek Lap Kok Link (TM-CLK
Link Project). The TM-CLK Link
Project is a designated project under Environmental Permit number EP-354/2009/D issued on 13 March 2015. The layout Plan of the Project and the Contract are showed in Appendix
A and B respectively.
1.1.2.
The construction works
of the Contract mainly include:-
a.
construction of an approximately 5.4 hectares
toll plaza and an associated footbridge;
b.
construction of associated carriageways
including approximately 0.74 kilometre land viaducts,
and an approximately 230 metres vehicular underpass
to connect the toll plaza and the roundabout at Lung Mun
Road/Lung Fu Road;
c.
site formation for the construction of the
toll plaza, including associated slope works and natural terrain hazard
mitigation measures;
d.
modification and realignment of the existing
Lung Mun Road and Lung Fu Road; and
e.
associated
waterworks, drainage, sewerage and landscaping works, etc..
1.1.3.
Action-United Environmental Services & Consulting has been commissioned as an Independent ET to implement the
relevant EM&A program in accordance
with the approved EM&A Manual, as well as the associated duties.
1.1.4.
This is the 11th Quarterly EM&A Summary
Report covering the period from 1 May to 31 July 2017.
1.2.1
The Quarterly Environmental Monitoring and
Audit (EM&A) Report is structured into the following sections:-
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Contract
Organization and Construction Progress
Section 3 Summary
of Impact Monitoring Requirements
Section 4 Air
Quality Monitoring
Section 5 Ecology
Monitoring
Section 6 Cultural
Heritage
Section 7 Landscape
and Visual
Section 8 Landfill
gas hazard Monitoring
Section 9 Waste
Management
Section 10 Site Inspections
Section 11 Environmental
Complaints and Non-Compliance
Section 12 Implementation
Status of Mitigation Measures
Section 13 Conclusions
and Recommendations
2.1.1
The Contract organization and contact details
of key personnel are shown in Appendix C.
2.2.1
In the Reporting Period, the major
construction activity conducted under the Contract is summarized in below. Moreover, the master construction
program and 2-month rolling programme is enclosed in Appendix
D.
May 2017
Instrumentation and Monitoring
Site Formation ¡V Earthwork on Slope D and E; surface drainage on Slope
C, D & E and Portion H;
Toll Plaza Decking and TD2;
Toll Plaza Footbridge;
Retaining Structure RW_A, RW_B and RW_F;
Toll Collector Subway & Associated Works;
Bridge G1, G2 and Bridge H1 by Form Traveller;
Sewer Culvert at FC1 and FC2;
Waterproofing and lining at Vehicular Underpass
Road and Drainage Works at +11mPD, +19mPD and Portion H
June 2017
Instrumentation and Monitoring
Site Formation ¡V Earthwork on Slope D and E; surface drainage on Slope
C, D & E and Portion H;
Toll Plaza Decking and TD2;
Toll Plaza Footbridge;
Retaining Structure RW_A, RW_B and RW_F;
Toll Collector Subway & Associated Works;
Bridge G1, G2 and Bridge H1 by Form Traveller;
Sewer Culvert at FC1 and FC2;
Waterproofing and lining at Vehicular Underpass
Road and Drainage Works at +11mPD, +19mPD and Portion H
July 2017
Instrumentation and Monitoring
Site Formation ¡V Earthwork on Slope D and E; surface drainage on Slope
C, D & E and Portion H;
Toll Plaza Decking and TD2;
Toll Plaza Footbridge;
Retaining Structure RW_A, RW_B and RW_F;
Toll Collector Subway & Associated Works;
Bridge G1, G2 and Bridge H1 by Form Traveller;
Sewer Culvert at FC1 and FC2;
Waterproofing and lining at Vehicular Underpass
Road and Drainage Works at +11mPD, +19mPD and Portion H
2.3.1
In according to the EP, the required
documents have submitted to EPD for retention which listed in below:
Monitoring Plan on Construction Dust (submission
refer to Contract HY/2012/08)
Landscape and Visual Plan (not yet endorsed by EPD)
Waste Management Plan (endorsed by EPD on 16 March 2015)
Baseline Monitoring Report (not yet endorsed
by EPD)
2.3.2
Summary of
the relevant permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental
protection for Contract No. HY/2013/12 are presented
in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Status
of Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
Type of Permit/
License |
Reference/ License No. |
Date of Issue |
Date of Expiry |
|
1 |
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation |
377719 |
06-08-2014 |
N/A |
2 |
Chemical Waste Producer Registration -
Waste Producers Number |
5117422C389301 |
03-09-2014 |
N/A |
3 |
Variation of Effluent Discharge License |
WT00023973-2016 |
14-03-16 |
30-09-2019 |
4 |
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account
for Disposal of Construction Waste |
7020460 |
01-08-2014 |
N/A |
5 |
CNP for Multiple Task |
GW-RW0619-16 |
05-11-2016 |
04-05-2017 |
6 |
Extend CNP for
Multiple Task |
GW-RW0230-17 |
08-05-2017 |
04-11-2017 |
7 |
CNP for MH5 |
GW-RW0650-16 |
18-11-2016 |
17-05-2017 |
8 |
Extend CNP for
MH5 |
GW-RW0242-17 |
22-05-2017 |
17-11-2017 |
9 |
CNP for Tunnel works |
GW-RW0653-16 |
23-11-2016 |
22-05-2017 |
10 |
Extent CNP for
Tunnel Works |
GW-RW0243-17 |
23-05-2017 |
22-11-2017 |
11 |
CNP for Falsework Erection |
GW-RW0205-17 |
25-04-2017 |
25-11-2017 |
12 |
CNP for Portion H Roundabout |
GW-RW0049-17 |
14-02-2017 |
18-08-2017 |
3.1.1
The major construction activities under the
Contract are land-based and no marine work will be involved. In accordance with the Project EM&A
Manual requirements, the environmental aspects under the Contract shall be included
air quality, ecological, cultural heritage, landscape and visual, landfill gas
and site inspection during construction period. In addition, audit of the contractor¡¦s
implementation of the construction noise and land-based water quality pollution
control measures are also required for the Contract.
3.1.2
A summary of construction phase EM&A
requirements are presented in the
sub-sections below.
3.2.1
The construction phase air quality monitoring
shall cover the following parameters:
•
1-hour TSP; and
•
24-hour TSP
3.3.1
The air quality
monitoring stations for impact monitoring are listed in Table 3-1
and illustrated in Appendix E.
Table
3-1 Air
Quality Monitoring Stations under the Contract
ID |
Location |
Air monitoring station
Description |
ASR1 |
Tuen Mun Fireboat Station |
EM&A Manual |
ASR5 |
Pillar Point Fire Station |
EM&A Manual |
AQMS1 |
Previous River Trade Golf |
Enhanced TSP Level under EP condition 2.4 |
ASR6 |
Butterfly Beach Laundry |
Enhanced TSP Level under EP condition 2.4 |
ASR10 |
Butterfly Beach Park |
Enhanced TSP Level under EP condition 2.4 |
3.4.1
As per Condition 2.4 of the EP of TM-CLKL, an
enhanced monitoring plan on TSP level at Tuen Mun (¡§the Enhanced TSP Monitoring Plan¡¨) is required to be
submitted to the DEP for approval at least 1 month before the commencement of
construction of the Project. Details
of the Enhanced TSP Monitoring Plan under Contract No. HY/2012/08 could be
found from the project website. The air quality monitoring work under this
Contract will follow the monitoring requirement of enhanced TSP monitoring
under the project.
3.4.2
The air quality monitoring requirements for
the Contract is summarized in Table 3-2.
Table
3-2 Enhanced
TSP Monitoring Plan ¡V Construction Phase
Condition |
Monitoring Parameter |
Monitoring Location |
Frequency |
Monitoring Requirement |
General |
1-hour TSP |
ASR1, ASR5, AQMS1, ASR6, ASR10 |
3 times per day every
six days |
Throughout the
Northern Connection, toll plaza and tunnel buildings construction works |
24-hour TSP |
ASR1, ASR5, AQMS1, ASR6, ASR10 |
Daily every six days |
||
Special |
1-hour TSP |
ASR1, ASR5, AQMS1, ASR6, ASR10 |
3 times per day every
three days |
Northern Connection During excavation
works for launching shaft, excavation work for Cut and Cover Tunnel and Cut
and Cover Tunnel Construction Toll Plaza During excavation,
slope works, construction of road and superstructures and wind erosion from
open sites and stockpiling areas Tunnel Buildings During excavation,
foundation works, construction of superstructures and wind erosion from open
sites and stockpiling areas |
24-hour TSP |
ASR1, ASR5, AQMS1, ASR6, ASR10 |
Daily every three days |
3.5.1
The 24-hour and 1-hour TSP levels shall be
measured by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in
the Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B.
3.5.2
The filter paper of 24-hour TSP measurement
shall be determined by HOKLAS accredited laboratory. A high volume sampler in
compliance with the following specifications shall be used for carrying out the
1-hr and 24-hr TSP monitoring:
(i)
0.6-1.7 m3/min (20-60
SCFM) adjustable flow range;
(ii)
equipped with a
timing/control device with +/- 5 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
(iii)
installed with
elapsed-time meter with +/- 2 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
(iv)
capable of providing a
minimum exposed area of 406 cm2 (63 in2);
(v)
flow control accuracy:
+/- 2.5% deviation over 24-hr sampling period;
(vi)
equipped with a shelter
to protect the filter and sampler;
(vii) incorporated with an electronic mass flow rate controller or other
equivalent devices;
(viii) equipped with a flow recorder for continuous monitoring;
(ix)
provided with a peaked
roof inlet;
(x)
equipped with a
manometer;
(xi)
able to hold and seal
the filter paper to the sampler housing in a horizontal position;
(xii) easy to change the filter; and
(xiii) capable of operating
continuously for 24-hr period.
3.5.3
Calibration of dust monitoring equipment
shall be conducted by the ET upon installation and in bi-monthly intervals
during construction phase. The
transfer standard shall be traceable to the internationally recognized primary
standard and be calibrated annually. The calibration data shall be properly
documented for future reference by concerned parties, such as the IEC. All the
data shall be converted into standard temperature and pressure condition.
3.5.4
The filter paper of 24-hour TSP measurement
shall be determined by HOKLAS accredited laboratory.
3.5.5
If the ET proposes to use a direct reading
dust meter to measure 1-hr TSP levels on an ad hoc basis, he shall submit
sufficient information to the IEC to prove that the instrument is capable of
achieving a comparable result as that the High Volume
Sampler (HVS) and may be used for the 1-hr sampling. The instrument should also be calibrated
regularly and the 1-hr sampling shall be checked periodically by the HVS to
check the validity and accuracy of the results measured by the direct reading
method.
3.5.6
According to the Project EM&A Manual,
wind data monitoring equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging
wind speed and wind direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location
shall be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind
data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
(i)
the wind sensors should
be installed on masts at an elevated level 10 m above ground so that they are
clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by the buildings;
(ii)
the wind data should be
captured by a data logger to be down-loaded for processing at least once a
month;
(iii)
the wind data monitoring
equipment should be re-calibrated at least once every six months; and
(iv)
wind direction should be
divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
3.6.1
The baseline monitoring results formed the
basis for determining the air quality criteria for the impact monitoring. The
ET shall compare the impact monitoring results with air quality criteria set up
for 24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP.
Based on results of the approved Baseline Monitoring Report of HyD Contract HY/2012/08, the Action and Limit Levels for
impact dust monitoring are shown in Tables 3-3.
Table 3-3 Action and Limit Levels for Impact Air
Quality Monitoring
Air Quality Monitoring Stations |
24-hour TSP (£gg/m3) |
1-hour TSP (£gg/m3) |
||
Action Level |
Limit Level |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
ASR1 |
213 |
260 |
331 |
500 |
ASR5 |
238 |
260 |
340 |
500 |
AQMS1 |
213 |
260 |
335 |
500 |
ASR6 |
238 |
260 |
338 |
500 |
ASR10 |
214 |
260 |
337 |
500 |
3.6.2
Should non-compliance of the environmental
quality criteria occurs, remedial actions will be triggered according to the
Event and Action Plan which presented in Appendix F.
Noise
3.7.1
The TM-CLKL EIA study stated that no existing
noise sensitive receiver (NSR) was identified within the Study Area at Tuen Mun. Therefore, no noise monitoring is
required for the construction phase of the Contract.
3.7.2
Regular site inspections and audits will be
carried out during the construction phase in order to confirm the construction
works under the Contract comply with the regulatory noise requirements.
Water Quality
3.7.3
No marine works will be undertaken under the Contract. Therefore, no water quality monitoring
is required for the construction phase of the Contract.
Ecology
3.7.4
No marine works will be undertaken under the Contract
and generated marine ecological impact, no dolphin monitoring is required for
the construction phase of the Contract.
3.7.5
During construction phase, the ET will
perform Pitcher Plants inspection at least once every week to report the growth
condition (only undertaken at Establishment period) and protection measures.
Landscape and Visual
3.7.6
Measures to mitigate landscape and visual
impact during construction should be checked and monitored by a Registered
Landscape Architect to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the
mitigation measures in accordance with the EM&A Manual.
Cultural Heritage
3.7.7
Grave G1 as a heritage resource is situated
near the proposed toll plaza in Tuen Mun. Site
inspections should be undertaken at least once per week throughout the
construction period to ensure compliance with the intended aims of recommended
mitigation measures.
3.7.8
During EIA study, landfill gas hazards are likely
to be generated from the Pillar Point Valley (PPV) Landfill. Landfill gas monitoring is recommended
during construction of the Contract to ensure the works area is free of
landfill gas before the worker entered the concerned area.
4.1.1
The air quality impact monitoring and enhanced
Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) level monitoring at five proposed locations
are currently carried out by the ET of Contract HY/2012/08. Sharing of impact air quality monitoring
data between HY/2012/08 and HY/2013/12 is agreed by all relevant parties. The Contract is not required to conduct
its own dust monitoring exercise until the Contract HY/2012/08 ends.
4.2.1
In the Reporting
Period, 1- hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring at the five proposed locations are continued
to perform by the ET of Contract HY/2012/08. Therefore, no air quality monitoring was
conducted by the ET of Contract HY/2013/12. Details information of air quality
monitoring results could be referred to the Monthly EM&A Reports of the
Contract HY /2012 /08 (May 2017, June 2017 and July 2017).
4.3.1
According to the air quality monitoring
result provided by Contract HY/2012/08, 3 Action Level exceedances of 1-hour
TSP were recorded at ASR5, ASR6 & ASR10 on 29 July 2017. Notification on Exceedances (NOEs) was issued on 10 August 2017
after receiving the monitoring result from the Contract HY/2012/08. The summary of air quality exceedance in
the Reporting Period is shown in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 Summary of Air Quality Monitoring Exceedance
Date of Exceedance |
Monitoring Station |
Air Quality Parameter |
Result |
Exceed |
29 July 2017 |
ASR5 |
1-hr TSP |
370 µg/m3 |
Action Level |
29 July 2017 |
ASR6 |
1-hr TSP |
401 µg/m3 |
Action Level |
29 July 2017 |
ASR10 |
1-hr TSP |
475 µg/m3 |
Action Level |
4.4.1
Investigation for the 1-hour TSP exceedance was undertaken upon
received the monitoring results by
the ET.
4.4.2
According to site
information provided by CRBC-Kaden JV, only housekeeping works and removal of
weeds was conducted on 29 July 2017.
To reduce dust impact arises from the contract, mitigation measures for
construction dust control by CRBC-Kaden JV were implemented and they are
included the following:-
water trucks were
arranged on haul road to keep road surface wet;
for un-accessible area,
water spraying by workers was provided;
to set speed control at
8 km/hr for all vehicles using the haul road; and
geotextile net provide to covering
part of the exposed slopes.
4.4.3
During regular site
inspection by ET on 25 July and 1 August 2017 observed that dust mitigation
measures were implemented and the site condition is acceptable.
4.4.4
Since only housekeeping
works and removal of weeds were undertaken by the Contractor on 29 July 2017, it was unlikely to create heavy construction dust impact. According to the wind direction and wind
speed data recording, south-westerly wind with speed 3.1 m/s blowing was recorded between 15:00 to 16:00. At that day, the highest measured
concentration level ASR10 was located at upstream of the construction site and
the monitoring stations ASR5 & ASR6 and monitoring also was undertaken at
similar time. Hence, the cause of
exceedance is considered due to the pollutant source located at upstream rather
than the construction site. Other
side, the contractor was also properly implemented the dust mitigation measure
under EMIS requirement.
4.4.5
Based on investigation
findings, the exceedance is unlikely related to the Contract work and no
corrective action was required accordingly. The investigation report was submitted
to all relevant parties on 28 August
2017 to close the exceedance incident.
5.1.1
According to the EM&A Manual
requirements, regularly
inspection for Pitcher Plants at least once every week to report it growth and protection
measure
situation shall be conducted during construction period.
5.2.1
Total 181 pitcher plants were transplanted to
final receptor site and the rest of the Pitcher Plant individuals (certified
dead by the specialist) were not transplanted and were treated as general
refuse. All the transplantation of pitcher plant from the nursery site to final
receptor site was completed on 10th September 2015.
5.2.2
In the Reporting Period, inspections for
implementation status of mitigation measures for the Pitcher Plants were
carried out by the ET on 4th, 9th, 16th, 23rd, 31st May 2017, 6th, 14th, 20th , 27th June 2017, 4th, 11th, 18th and 25th July 2017.
5.2.3
Establishment period for the pitcher plants
was completed at the end of September 2016, the join site completion of Establishment
period visit with AFCD was undertaken on 23 September 2016 and the final
pitcher plants report was submitted to AFCD on early December 2016. Therefore after 23 September
2016, only the integrity of the protection fence was checked to fulfill the EIA
requirement. During each inspection, the protection mitigation measures were
checking at the final receptor area to make sure no site activities was
undertaken inside the protection zone. Besides, no construction activities were
observed to be carried out at the surrounding of the final receptor area. The condition of chain link fence is
good and no repair or maintenance is required.
5.2.4
No matters the
completion of Establishment period, the Contractor should properly maintain the
fencing along the receptor area to avoid disturbance to the pitcher plants
under the EIA requirement.
6.1.1
According to the
EM&A Manual requirements, regular inspection for heritage resource, Grave
G1, shall be audited by the ET at least once every week to ensure recommended
mitigation measures implemented during construction period. The aim of the
survey is to prevent any possible damage to the grave and to ensure the
proposed mitigation measures are implemented. The broad scope of the audit will
involve supervision of the following:
Non-contact effects of
the engineering works, such as vibration from pneumatic drills which could cause
damage, such as foundation or wall cracks and loosening of tiles or fixtures;
and
Contact between the
historic structures and equipment and materials associated with the engineering
works.
6.1.2
Specifically, the
monitoring programme will entail the following tasks:
The extent of the agreed
works areas should be regularly checked during the construction phase to ensure
the buffer is being maintained; and
Ensure no stockpiling or
equipment storage is affecting the structure.
6.1.3
In the event of non-compliance the
responsibilities of the relevant parties is detailed in the Event/ Action Plan
in Appendix
F.
6.2.1
In the Reporting Period, site inspection for
the Grave G1 was undertaken on 4th, 9th, 16th, 23rd, 31st May 2017, 6th, 14th, 20th , 27th June 2017, 4th, 11th, 18th and 25th July 2017. During
these inspections, buffer zone was maintained between the working area and the
Grave. The nearby areas were clean,
and no construction materials or mechanical equipment were stored within or
close to the buffer zone. Moreover protective
measures (hoarding and scaffold with protective net above the grave) was
provided for constructing Toll Plaza Decking TD2 deck structure.
6.2.2
Accordingly, the Contractor has had fully
implemented cultural heritage mitigation measures in accordance with the
EM&A Manual requirements.
7.1.1
According to EM&A Manual requirements,
monitoring of Contractor¡¦s operations during construction period to report on
Contractor¡¦s compliance should be carried out on weekly basis. Measure to mitigate landscape and visual
impact during construction should be checked and monitored by a Registered
Landscape Architect to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the
mitigation measures. Moreover, the
progress of the engineering works shall be regularly reviewed on site to
identify the earliest practical opportunities for the landscape works to be
undertaken.
7.2.1
In the Reporting Period, site inspection for
landscape and visual mitigation measures was undertaken by the Registered
Landscape Architect on 5th, 12th, 19th , 26th May 2017, 2nd, 9th, 16th, 23rd , 30th
June 2017, 4th, 11th, 18th and 25th July 2017.
7.2.2
Most of the landscape works such as planting
was not yet commenced. The detailed
inspection checklists can be referred
to the Monthly EM&A Reports (May 2017, June 2017 and July 2017) of the contract.
8.1.1
During EIA study, landfill gas hazards are
likely to be generated from the Pillar Point Valley (PPV) Landfill. Hence,
regular landfill gas monitoring is recommended during construction of the
proposed toll plaza.
8.1.2
During construction, a Safety Officer should
be appointed to carry out the monitoring works. The monitoring frequency and
areas to be monitored should be set down prior to commencement of ground-works
either by the Safety Officer or an approved and appropriated qualified person.
The routine monitoring should be carried out in all excavations, manholes,
chambers, relocation of monitoring wells and any other confined spaces that may
have been created. All measurements in excavations should be made with the
extended monitoring tube located not more than 10 mm from the exposed ground
surface. Monitoring should be performed properly to make sure that the area is
free of landfill gas before any man enters in the area.
8.1.3
For excavations deeper than 1m, measurements
should be carried out:
at the ground surface
before excavation commences;
immediately before any
worker enters the excavation;
at the beginning of each
working day for the entire period the excavation remains open; and
periodically through the working day whilst workers are in the excavation.
8.1.4
For excavations between 300mm and 1m deep,
measurements should be carried out:
directly after the
excavation has been completed; and
periodically whilst the
excavation remains open
8.1.5
For excavations less than 300mm deep,
monitoring may be omitted, at the discretion of the Safety Officer or other
appropriately qualified person.
8.1.6
To ensure the accuracy of the monitoring
data, zeroing of the gas analyser shall be undertaken
at the start of each day¡¦s monitoring.
As part of the QA/QC, calibration of the gas analyser
shall be conducted at least once every two weeks according to the specification
of the manufacturer¡¦s operation manual.
8.1.7
The landfill consultation zone was divided
into 6 monitoring zones. The landfill gas monitoring zones are summarized in
Table 8-1 and the layout plan for the monitoring zone is illustrated in Appendix
E.
Table 8-1 Landfill
Gas Monitoring Zone
ID |
Location |
Excavation >300mm deep
undertaken in this reporting period |
TD1 |
TD1, Retaining Wall A, Grave
G1 and Subway |
Yes |
RW-B |
Retaining Wall B |
No |
RW-F |
Retaining Wall F |
No |
S&U |
Slope and Underpass |
No |
BW |
Bridge Works (G2, H1) |
No |
LMR |
Lung Mun Road |
Yes |
8.2.1
In the Reporting Period, landfill gas monitoring was conducted at the zone TD1 and LMR which have excavation works was undertaking. A BIOGAS
5000 gas analyser was used for the landfill gas
monitoring.
8.2.2
There were total 75 workings days monitoring
were carried by the Safety Officer or an approved and qualified persons in this
reporting period. Table 8-2 is summarized landfill gas measurement results. Moreover, graphical plot are attached in
Appendix
G.
Table 8-2 Summary of
Landfill Gas Measurement Results
in Reporting Period
Landfill Gas Parameter |
Action
Level |
Limit
Level |
Detectable at TD1 |
Detectable at LMR |
||
Min |
Max |
Min |
Max |
|||
Methane |
>10% LEL (>0.5%
v/v) |
>20% LEL (>1% v/v) |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.1% |
0.1% |
Oxygen |
<19% |
<18% |
21.0% |
21.1% |
21.0% |
21.1% |
Carbon Dioxide |
>0.5% |
>1.5% |
0.1% |
0.2% |
0.1% |
0.2% |
8.2.3
The measurement results shown that slightly
methane concentration was detected and all oxygen concentration was over 21.0%
and Carbon Dioxide was between 0.1 and 0.2 %. No corrective action was required
accordingly.
9.1.1
Waste management was carried out by an
on-site Environmental Officer or an Environmental Supervisor from time to time.
9.2.1
All types of waste arising from the
construction work are classified into the following:
l Construction
& Demolition (C&D) Material;
l Chemical
Waste;
l General
Refuse; and
l Excavated
Soil.
9.2.2
Whenever possible, materials were reused
on-site as far as practicable. The quantities
of waste for disposal in the Reporting Period are summarized in Tables
9-1 and 9-2 and the Waste Flow Table is presented in Appendix
H.
Table 9-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
Type of Waste |
Quantity |
Disposal Location |
||
May 17 |
Jun 17 |
Jul 17 |
||
Reused in this
Project (Inert) (in '000 m3) |
2.089 |
0.789 |
1.961 |
- |
Reused in other
Projects (Inert) (in '000 m3) |
7.793 |
4.388 |
3.482 |
• Lam Tei Quarry • Eco Park
K.wah Recycle Facilities • Lung Kwu Tan Tailor Recycled Aggregates • Laintang BCP • TM-CLKL
C2 |
Disposal as Public
Fill (Inert) (in '000 m3) |
0.341 |
0.789 |
1.120 |
Tuen Mum Area 38 |
Table 9-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
Type of Waste |
Quantity |
Disposal
Location |
||
May 17 |
Jun 17 |
Jul 17 |
||
Recycled Metal (in '000kg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Recycled
Paper / Cardboard Packaging (in '000kg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Recycled
Plastic (in '000kg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
Chemical
Wastes (in '000kg) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
- |
General
Refuses (in '000m3) |
0.195 |
0.177 |
0.220 |
WENT |
9.2.3
To control the site performance on waste
management, the Contractor shall ensure that all solid and liquid waste
management works are fully in compliance with the relevant license/permit
requirements, such as the effluent discharge license and the chemical waste
producer registration. The
Contractor is also reminded to implement the recommended environmental
mitigation measures according to the Environmental Monitoring and Audit Manual.
10.1.1
According to the approved EM&A Manual,
the environmental site inspection shall be formulation by ET Leader. Weekly environmental site inspections should
carry out to confirm the environmental performance.
10.1.2 During the
Reporting Period, 13 events of the joint site inspections were undertaken to
evaluate the site environmental performance. The summaries of the findings during
site inspection are presented in Tables 10-1 and 10-2.
Table 10-1 Site
Observations for the Contract for the Reporting Period
Date |
Findings /
Deficiencies |
Follow-Up Status |
4 May 2017 |
Ponding water cumulated
inside the pit was observed. The contractor should clean up the ponding water
to prevent mosquito breeding. (Retaining Wall B) |
Ponding
water cumulated inside the pit was removed. |
9 May 2017 |
NRMM label should
be displayed properly for NRMM using on-site. (Central Divider) |
NRMM label
was displayed properly. |
16 May 2017 |
Ponding water cumulated inside the construction
material should be removed to prevent mosquito breeding. (G2 Bridge) |
Ponding water cumulated inside the construction
material was removed. |
23 May 2017 |
Free standing oil drum without drip tray was observed.
Drip tray should be provided for all chemical storage on-site. (East Portal) |
Free standing oil drum without drip tray was removed. |
Housekeeping
should be improved. C&D waste cumulated on site should be cleaned more
frequency. (TD1) |
C&D waste observed in last inspection was cleared. |
|
31 May 2017 |
Broken
tarpaulin covered on the explosed slope should be replaced to prevent surface
run-off contaminate during rainstorm. (Slope near stream B) |
Broken
tarpaulin covered on the explosed slope was
replaced. |
Housekeeping
should be improved. C&D waste cumulated on site should be cleaned more
frequency. (TD1) |
Not required for reminder. |
|
6 June 2017 |
The
contractor was reminded to clear scattered wastes at work area near proposed
fire station. (Works area near fire station) |
Not required for reminder. |
14 June 2017 |
Sand bag
should be provided to prevent muddy surface run-off flow into the cascade. Broken
sand bags inside the cascade should be removed. (Cascade E) |
Sand bags
was provided to prevent muddy surface run-off flow into the cascade and
broken sand bags inside the cascade was removed. |
Ponding
water cumulated inside the pit after rainstorm should be removed to prevent
mosquito breeding. (TD2) |
Not required for reminder. |
|
20 June 2017 |
C&D materials should not be stored near to the
existing tree. (Portion H) |
C&D materials near the existing tree was removed. |
EP should be displayed at
all site entrance. (Works area near fire station) |
EP was
displayed properly at the site entrance. |
|
27 June 2017 |
Ponding water cumulated on site after rainstorm should
be removed to prevent mosquito breeding. (General) |
Not
required for reminder. |
4 July 2017 |
Dust emitted from drilling works was observed.
Proper dust mitigation measures should be provided to reduce dust generation.
(Slope E) |
Water spraying was provided to minimize dust
generation. |
NRMM label should be displayed properly before
NRMM is operating. |
Not required for reminder. |
|
11 July 2017 |
Backhoe without display NRMM label using on site
was observed. NRMM label should be displayed properly for all NRMM using
on-site. (Lung Mun Road near Butterfly Beach) |
The power of the backhoe was below 19kW, therefore no NRMM label was required. |
Site surface run-off discharge into the stream
was observed. All surface run-off should be diverted
to proper de-silting facilities and discharge into assigned discharge point.
(Works area at Mong Fat Street Roundabout) |
Sub-marine pump was removed and the site run-off
was diverted to the de-silting facilities prior discharge. |
|
Drip tray should be provided for all chemical
containers storage on-site. (General) |
Not required for reminder. |
|
Soil and debris cumulated inside the manhole
should be removed. Earth bund and proper cover should be provided for the
existing manhole to prevent muddy water or soil flowing into manhole during
rainstorm. (Works area at Mong Fat Street
Roundabout) |
Not required for reminder. |
|
18 July 2017 |
Drip tray should be provided for all chemical
storage on-site. (Bridge G2) |
Chemical containers without drip tray were
removed. |
Stagnant water cumulated on-site after the
rainstorm should be cleared to prevent mosquito breeding. (General) |
Not required for reminder. |
|
25 July 2017 |
Dust mitigation measures should be provided for
drilling works to reduce dust generation.(Slope D) |
Water spraying was provided for drilling works. |
Proper maintenance should be provided for the
tarpaulin covered on the slope. Broken tarpaulin should be replaced. (Stream
B) |
Broken
tarpaulin was replaced. |
|
Protection zone for the existing grave should be
maintained properly under EP requirement. No construction materials or works
should be stored or undertaken within the protection zone. (Grave G1) |
Not
required for reminder. |
Table 10-2 Summary
of Reminders/Observations of Site Inspection
Reporting Period |
Date of site inspection |
Nos. of findings / reminders |
|
May 2017 |
4th, 9th, 16th,
23rd and 31st May 2017 |
7 |
Completed |
June 2017 |
6th, 14th, 20th
and 27th June 2017 |
6 |
Completed |
July 2017 |
4th, 11th, 18th
and 25th July 2017 |
11 |
Completed |
10.1.3 In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded,
however, 24 observations/
reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor
deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general rectified
within the specified deadlines. The
environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered satisfactory.
Inspection Checklist for Vulnerable to Contaminated Water Discharge
10.1.4
Following
to the complaint about discharge of milky water to Bufferfly Beach on 2
September 2015. The Contractor
proposed to carry out daily inspection of wastewater treatment facilities,
concerned discharge points, drainage inlets and outlets during typhoon or wet
season.
10.1.5
In
addition, specific inspections would also be conducted before and after adverse
weather to ensure necessary remedial works would be carried out timely. Should
incidental contaminated water discharge be found at the inlet of the associated
drainage system, a specific inspection of the relevant drainage pipes would be
conducted for traces of deposit, and follow up actions would be taken when
necessary.
10.1.6
The
daily inspection for vulnerable to contaminated water discharge
was conducted by the Contractor from 12 April 2017 during the wet season, the associated inspection checklists of the reporting
peroid were presented in the Monthly EM&A Report ¡V May
2017, June 2017 and July 2017.
11.1.1 In the
Reporting Period, no environmental complaint, summons and prosecution under the
EM&A Programme was lodged. Moreover, no exceedance
of the environmental performance (Action / Limit Levels) was recorded for
monitoring programme.-
11.1.2 The
statistical summary table of environmental exceedance, complaint, summons and
prosecution is presented in Tables 11-1, 11-2, 11-3 and 11-4.
Table 11-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Exceedance
Reporting Period |
Environmental Aspect / Parameter |
Environmental Performance |
Event
Exceedance |
||
Reporting
Period |
Previous
Periods |
Cumulative |
|||
23
October 2014 ¡V 30 April 2017 |
Air Quality - 1-hr TSP |
Action Level |
3 |
4 |
7 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
||
1 May 2017 ¡V 31 July 2017 |
Air Quality - 24-hr
TSP |
Action Level |
0 |
4 |
4 |
Limit Level |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Table 11-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
Reporting Period |
Environmental
Complaint Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
23
October 2014 ¡V 30 April 2017 |
7 |
7 |
Water (6), Air (1) |
1 May 2017 ¡V 31 July 2017 |
0 |
7 |
Water (6), Air (1) |
Table 11-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
Reporting Period |
Environmental Summons
Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
23
October 2014 ¡V 30 April 2017 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
1 May 2017 ¡V 31 July 2017 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
Table 11-4 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
Reporting Period |
Environmental Prosecution
Statistics |
||
Frequency |
Cumulative |
Complaint Nature |
|
23
October 2014 ¡V 30 April 2017 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
1 May 2017 ¡V 31 July 2017 |
0 |
0 |
NA |
12.1.1
The environmental mitigation measures that
recommended in the Environmental Mitigation and Enhancement Measures
Implementation Schedule (EMIS) for in the Project EM&A Manual covered the
issues of air quality, cultural heritage, ecology, landfill gas hazard, landscape & visual,
noise, water and waste. The
updated EMIS for the Contract is shown in Appendix I.
12.1.2
The Contractor shall implement the required
environmental mitigation measures according to the EM&A Manual as subject
to the site condition. The environmental mitigation measures implemented by the
Contract in this Reporting Period are summarized in Table 12-1 and Appendix
I.
Table 12-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
Issues |
Environmental Mitigation Measures |
Air Quality |
¡P Maintain damp / wet surface
on access road ¡P Keep slow speed in the sites ¡P All vehicles must use wheel
washing facility before off site ¡P Sprayed water during rock
breaking works ¡P During transportation by truck, materials loaded lower
than the side and tail boards, and covered before transport ¡P Compacted all soil stockpiles ¡P Part of the exposed slopes covered geotextile net |
Cultural Heritage |
¡P Set a buffer zone between the working area
and the Grave ¡P All construction materials and equipment store far from
the Grave ¡P Inspection the Grave to ensure provision mitigation
measures effective |
Ecology |
¡P
Wire fencing provided
for temporary protect Pitcher Plants ¡P
Undertake weekly
inspection of Pitcher Plants |
Landfill Gas Hazard |
¡P
Landfill Gas
measurement undertake during trench excavation |
Water Quality |
¡P Temporary drainage system
provide for surface runoff prevent discharge to public area ¡P Wastewater to be treated by
sedimentation tank before discharge. |
Noise |
¡P No
operation of powered mechanical equipment is allowed during restricted hours
from 19:00 to 07:00 on the following day and whole day during Sunday and
public holiday without a valid construction noise permit (CNP). ¡P Keep good maintenance of
plants ¡P The noisy plants or works
provide mobile noise barriers ¡P Shut down the plants when
not in used |
Waste and Chemical
Management |
¡P On-site sorting prior to
disposal ¡P Follow requirements and
procedures of the ¡§Trip-ticket System¡¨ ¡P
Predict required quantity of concrete accurately ¡P Collect the unused fresh concrete at designated
locations in the sites for subsequent disposal |
General |
¡P The site was generally kept
tidy and clean. |
13.1.1 This is 11th Quarterly EM&A report presenting the monitoring
results and inspection findings for the Reporting Period from 1 May to 31 July 2017.
13.1.2 No
exceedances of 24-hour TSP monitoring were recorded in the Reporting Period.
However, there were three
exceedances of 1-hour TSP measurements trigger in Action Level at ASR5, ASR6 & ASR10 on 29 July 2017. NOE was issued to notify all relevant
parties. Investigation report for the exceedances is underway by the ET and it
will submit to all relevant parties.
13.1.3 In this
Reporting Period, no noise complaint was
received by RE, the Contractor, ENPO or HyD. No Action Level exceedances were triggered and no NOE or the associated corrective actions were therefore issued.
13.1.4 Site
inspection for landscape and visual was conducted on weekly basis by the
Landscape Architect to ensure the compliance of the intended aims of the
mitigation measures. Most of the
landscape works such as planting was not yet commenced.
13.1.5 Establishment period for the pitcher plants was completed at the end of
September 2016, the join site completion of Establishment period visit with
AFCD was undertaken on 23 September 2016 and the final pitcher plants report
was submitted to AFCD on early December 2016. Therefore
after 23 September 2016, only the integrity of the protection fence was checked
to fulfil the EIA requirement. During each inspection, the protection
mitigation measures were checking at the final receptor area to make sure no
site activities was undertaken inside the protection zone. Besides, no
construction activities were observed to be carried out at the surrounding of
the final receptor area. The
condition of chain link fence is good and no repair or maintenance is required.
13.1.6 Landfill
gas monitoring was conducted at the TD1 and Lung Mun
Road works area by the Safety Officer.
The monitoring results shown no exceedances were triggered.
13.1.7 In the
Reporting Period, no environmental complaint was received.
13.1.8 No notifications of summons, or successful prosecution
were received by the Contractor during the Reporting Period.
13.1.9 During the
Reporting Period, 13 events of the joint site inspections were undertaken to
evaluate the site environmental performance. No non-compliance
of environmental impacts were observed, indicating the
implemented mitigation measures for air quality, construction noise and water
quality were effective. Minor
deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were rectified within the
specified deadlines. The
environmental performance of the Project was considered satisfactory.
13.1.10For
cultural heritage, the buffer zone between the working area and the Grave was
observed and no construction material or equipment was stored nearby.
13.1.11No
notifications of summons, or successful prosecution were received by the
Contractor during the Reporting Period.
13.2.1 Air quality mitigation measures such as watering of site area for 12
times per day and covering of exposed slopes should be continued to fully implement
reduce construction dust impact as recommended in the EMIS.
13.2.2 During rainy season, the Contractor should particular attention on the
potential water quality impact and water quality mitigation measures should be fully implemented to avoid muddy runoff
overflow from the site.
13.2.3 Good
practice for daily housekeeping is kindly reminded. Moreover, clean-up of waste skips and wastewater treatment system should be
increased frequency to ensure these facilities are functioned effectively.
13.2.4 The Contractor
has had responsibility prevent mosquito breeding on site; stagnant water shall
be removed as soon as possible after rain.