table of
Contents
Executive
Summary
1.1 Background
1.2 Scope of Report
1.3 Organization Structure
1.4 Summary of Construction Works
2.1 Air quality
2.2 Water Quality Monitoring
2.3 Dolphin Monitoring
2.4 EM&A Site Inspection
2.5 Waste Management Status
2.6 Environmental Licenses and
Permits
2.7 Implementation Status of
Environmental Mitigation Measures
2.8 Summary of Exceedances of the
Environmental Quality Performance Limit
2.9 Summary of Complaints,
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions
3.1 Construction Activities for
the Coming Month
3.2 Key Issues for the Coming
Month
3.3 Monitoring Schedule for the
Coming Month
4 Conclusions
and recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
Under Contract No. HY/2012/08,
Dragages – Bouygues Joint Venture (DBJV) is
commissioned by the Highways Department (HyD) to
undertake the design and construction of the Northern Connection Sub-sea Tunnel
Section of the Tuen Mun – Chek Lap Kok Link Project (TM-CLK
Link Project) while AECOM Asia Company Limited was appointed by HyD as the Supervising Officer. For implementation of the environmental
monitoring and audit (EM&A) programme under the
Contract, ERM-Hong Kong, Limited (ERM) has been appointed as the Environmental
Team (ET) in accordance with Environmental
Permit No. EP-354/2009/A. Ramboll Environ
Hong Kong Ltd. was employed by HyD as the Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) and Environmental Project Office (ENPO). Subsequent applications for
variation of environmental permits (VEP), EP-354/2009/B, EP-354/2009/C and EP-354/2009/D, were granted on 28 January 2014, 10 December 2014
and 13 March 2015, respectively.
The construction phase of the Project commenced on 1
November 2013 and will tentatively be completed by the end of 2018. The impact monitoring of the EM&A programme, including air quality, water quality, marine
ecological monitoring and environmental site inspections, were commenced on 1
November 2013.
This is the Twenty-third Monthly EM&A report
presenting the EM&A works carried out during the period from 1 to 30
September 2015 for the Contract No.
HY/2012/08 Northern
Connection Sub-sea Tunnel Section (the “Project”) in
accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual of the TM-CLK
Link Project. As informed by the
Contractor, major activities in the reporting period included:
Land-based Works
·
Surcharge Removal at Works Area – Portion N-C;
·
Box Culvert Extension at Works Area – Portion N-A;
·
Construction of capping beam and base slab for
Ventilation Shaft at Works Area – Portion N-C;
·
Installation of Tower Crane at Works Area – Portion
N-C;
·
TBM Tunnel Works at Works Area – Portion N-B; and
·
Modification and Maintenance Works for Slurry
Treatment Plant at Works Area – Portion N-C.
A summary of monitoring and audit activities conducted
in the reporting period is listed below:
24-hour TSP Monitoring 10
sessions
1-hour TSP Monitoring 10
sessions
Impact Dolphin Monitoring 2 sessions
Joint Environmental Site Inspection 5 sessions
Implementation
of Marine Mammal Exclusion Zone
There was no dredging, reclamation
or marine sheet piling works in open waters during this reporting period.
Thus, Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) and the day-time monitoring of Dolphin
Exclusion Zone (DEZ) by dolphin observers were not in effect during the reporting
period.
Summary of Breaches of Action/Limit Levels
Breaches of
Action and Limit Levels for Air Quality
No Action Level or Limit Level of air quality
exceedances were recorded in the air quality monitoring of this reporting
month.
Environmental Complaints, Non-compliance & Summons
No
non-compliance with EIA recommendations, EP conditions and other requirements
associated with the construction of this Contract was recorded in this
reporting period.
No
environmental complaint was received in this reporting period.
No
environmental summons was received in this reporting period.
Reporting
Change
There was no reporting change required in the
reporting period.
Upcoming Works for the Next Reporting Month
Works to be undertaken in the next monitoring period
of October 2015 include the following:
Land-based Works
· Box
Culvert Extension at Works Area – Portion N-A;
· Installation
of Tower Crane at Works Area – Portion N-C;
· Base
Slab Construction for Ventilation Shaft at Works Area – Portion N-C;
· TBM
Tunnel Works at Works Area – Portion N-B; and
· Modification
and Maintenance Works for Slurry Treatment Plant at Works Area – Portion N-C.
Future Key Issues
Potential environmental impacts arising from the above
upcoming construction activities in the next reporting month of October 2015
are expected to be mainly associated with dust, marine ecology and waste
management.
According to the findings of the Northwest New
Territories (NWNT) Traffic and Infrastructure Review conducted by the Transport
Department, Tuen Mun Road,
Ting Kau Bridge, Lantau Link and North Lantau Highway
would be operating beyond capacity after 2016.
This forecast has been based on the estimated increase in cross boundary
traffic, developments in the Northwest New Territories (NWNT), and possible
developments in North Lantau, including the Airport developments, the Lantau
Logistics Park (LLP) and the Hong Kong – Zhuhai – Macao Bridge (HZMB). In order to cope with the anticipated traffic
demand, two new road sections between NWNT and North Lantau – Tuen Mun – Chek
Lap Kok Link (TM-CLKL) and Tuen
Mun Western Bypass (TMWB) are proposed.
An Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of TM-CLKL
(the Project) was prepared in accordance with the EIA Study Brief (No. ESB-175/2007) and the Technical
Memorandum of the Environmental Impact Assessment Process (EIAO-TM). The EIA Report was submitted under the
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO) in August 2009. Subsequent to the approval of the EIA Report
(EIAO Register Number AEIAR-146/2009), an Environmental Permit (EP-354/2009)
for TM-CLKL was granted by the Director of Environmental Protection (DEP) on 4
November 2009, and EP variation (VEP) (EP-354/2009A) was issued on 8 December
2010. Subsequent applications for
variation of environmental permits (VEPs), EP-354/2009/B,
EP-354/2009/C and EP-354/2009/D,
were granted on 28 January 2014, 10 December 2014 and 13 March 2015,
respectively.
Under Contract No. HY/2012/08,
Dragages – Bouygues Joint Venture (DBJV) is
commissioned by the Highways Department (HyD) to
undertake the design and construction of the Northern Connection Sub-sea Tunnel
Section of TM-CLKL while AECOM Asia Company Limited was appointed by HyD as the Supervising Officer. For implementation of the environmental
monitoring and audit (EM&A) programme under the
Contract, ERM-Hong Kong, Limited (ERM) has been appointed as the Environmental
Team (ET). Ramboll Environ
Hong Kong Ltd. was employed by HyD as the Independent
Environmental Checker (IEC) and Environmental Project Office (ENPO).
Layout of the Contract components is
presented in Figure 1.1.
The organization structure of the Contract is shown in
Appendix A. The
key personnel contact names and contact details are summarized in Table 1.1 below.
Table 1.1 Contact Information of Key Personnel
Party |
Position |
Name |
Telephone |
Fax |
Highways
Department |
Engr
16/HZMB |
Kenneth Lee |
2762 4996 |
3188 6614 |
SOR (AECOM Asia
Company Limited) |
Chief
Resident Engineer |
Edwin Ching Andrew
Westmoreland |
2293 6388 2293 6360 |
2293 6300 2293 6300 |
ENPO / IEC (Ramboll Environ Hong Kong Ltd.) |
ENPO Leader |
Y.H. Hui |
3547 2133 |
3465 2899 |
IEC |
Dr. F.C.
Tsang |
3547 2134 |
3465 2899 |
|
Contractor (Dragages – Bouygues Joint Venture) |
Environmental
Manager |
C.F. Kwong |
2293 7322 |
2293 7499 |
Environmental
Officer 24-hour
complaint hotline |
Bryan Lee Rachel Lam |
2293 7323 2293 7330 |
2293 7499 |
|
ET (ERM-HK) |
ET Leader |
Jovy Tam |
2271 3113 |
2723 5660 |
Table
1.2 Summary of Construction Activities Undertaken during the
Reporting Period
Construction Activities Undertaken |
Land-based Works |
·
Surcharge Removal at Works Area – Portion N-C; ·
Box Culvert Extension at Works Area – Portion N-A; ·
Construction of capping beam and base slab for
Ventilation Shaft at Works Area – Portion N-C; ·
Installation of Tower Crane at Works Area – Portion
N-C; ·
TBM Tunnel Works at Works Area – Portion N-B; and ·
Modification and Maintenance Works for Slurry
Treatment Plant at Works Area – Portion N-C. |
Figure 1.2 Locations of Construction Activities – September 2015
|
The EM&A programme required
environmental monitoring for air quality, water quality and marine ecology as
well as environmental site inspections for air quality, noise, water quality,
waste management, marine ecology and landscape and visual impacts. The EM&A requirements and related
findings for each component are summarized in the following sections
In accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual and the
Enhanced TSP Monitoring Plan, impact 1-hour TSP monitoring was conducted three
(3) times every six (6) days and impact 24-hour TSP monitoring was carried out
once every six (6) days when the highest dust impact was expected. 1-hr and 24-hr TSP monitoring frequency was
increased to three times per day every three days and daily every three days,
respectively, as excavation works for launching shaft commenced on 24 October
2014.
High volume samplers (HVSs) were used to carry out the
1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring on 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26 and 29
September 2015 at the five (5) air quality monitoring stations in accordance
with the requirements stipulated in the Updated EM&A Manual (Figure 2.1; Table 2.1). Wind meter was installed at the rooftop of
ASR5 for logging wind speed and wind direction.
Details of the equipment deployed are provided in Table 2.2. Copies of the
calibration certificates for the equipment are presented in Appendix E.
Table 2.1 Locations of Impact Air Quality
Monitoring Stations and Monitoring Dates in this Reporting Period
Monitoring Station |
Monitoring Dates |
Location |
Description |
Parameters
& Frequency |
ASR1 |
2,
5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26 and 29 September 2015 |
Tuen Mun Fireboat Station |
Office |
TSP monitoring
1-hour Total Suspended
Particulates (1-hour TSP, µg/m3), 3 times in every 6 days
24-hour Total
Suspended Particulates (24-hour TSP, µg/m3), daily for 24-hour in
every 6 days Enhanced TSP monitoring (commenced on 24 October 2014)
1-hour Total Suspended
Particulates (1-hour TSP, µg/m3), 3 times in every 3 days
24-hour Total
Suspended Particulates (24-hour TSP, µg/m3), daily for 24-hour in
every 3 days |
ASR5 |
|
Pillar
Point Fire Station |
Office |
|
AQMS1 |
|
Previous
River Trade Golf |
Bare
ground |
|
ASR6 |
|
Butterfly
Beach Laundry |
Office |
|
ASR10 |
|
Butterfly
Beach Park |
Recreational
uses |
Table 2.2 Air
Quality Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Brand and Model |
High Volume Sampler |
Tisch Environmental Mass Flow Controlled Total Suspended
Particulate (TSP) High Volume Sampler (Model No. TE-5170) |
Wind Meter |
Davis (Model: Weather Wizard III (S/N: WE90911A30) |
Wind Anemometer for calibration |
Lutron (Model No. AM-4201) |
The Action and Limit Levels of the air quality
monitoring is provided in Appendix D. The Event and Action plan is presented in Appendix J.
The schedule for air quality monitoring in September
2015 is provided in Appendix F.
The monitoring results for 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP
are summarized in Tables 2.3 and 2.4, respectively. Detailed impact air quality monitoring
results and graphical presentations are presented in Appendix G.
Table 2.3 Summary of 1-hour TSP Monitoring Results in this Reporting
Period
Station |
Average (µg/m3) |
Range (µg/m3) |
Action Level (µg/m3) |
Limit Level (µg/m3) |
ASR1 |
109 |
56
– 283 |
331 |
500 |
ASR5 |
116 |
52
– 293 |
340 |
500 |
AQMS1 |
98 |
49
– 167 |
335 |
500 |
ASR6 |
103 |
59
– 238 |
338 |
500 |
ASR10 |
70 |
42
– 110 |
337 |
500 |
Table 2.4 Summary of 24-hour TSP Monitoring Results in this Reporting
Period
Station |
Average (µg/m3) |
Range (µg/m3) |
Action Level (µg/m3) |
Limit Level (µg/m3) |
ASR1 |
76 |
49
– 137 |
213 |
260 |
ASR5 |
78 |
45
– 124 |
238 |
260 |
AQMS1 |
68 |
48
– 87 |
213 |
260 |
ASR6 |
68 |
54
– 93 |
238 |
260 |
ASR10 |
58 |
45
– 84 |
214 |
260 |
The weather condition during the monitoring period
varied from sunny to cloudy. The major dust
sources in the reporting period include construction activities under the
Contract as well as nearby traffic emissions.
A total of ten monitoring events were undertaken in
which no Action or Limit Level exceedances of 1-hr TSP were recorded in this reporting
month. No Action or Limit Level
exceedances for 24-hr TSP were record.
Meteorological information collected at the ASR5,
including wind speed and wind direction, is provided in Appendix H.
As informed by the Contractor, Phase I Reclamation
works for the Northern Landfall was substantially completed in December 2014, a
proposal letter was sent to EPD on 21 May 2015 to seek approval for the
temporary suspension of Water Quality Monitoring. Subsequently, a letter from EPD on 5 June
2015 stated that they have no strong objection to the temporary suspension of
the water quality monitoring. Water
Quality Monitoring was suspended from 6 June 2015 effectively and will resume
when Phase II Reclamation commences in the fourth quarter of 2016 tentatively.
Impact dolphin monitoring is required to be conducted
by a qualified dolphin specialist team to evaluate whether there have been any
effects on the dolphins. In order to
fulfil the EM&A requirements and make good use of available resources, the
on-going impact line transect dolphin monitoring data collected by HyD’s Contract No. HY/2011/03 Hong
Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge. Hong Kong Link Road - Section between Scenic
Hill and Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities on the monthly basis is
adopted to avoid duplicates of survey effort.
Table 2.5 summarises the equipment used for the impact dolphin
monitoring.
Table 2.5 Dolphin Monitoring Equipment
Equipment |
Model |
Global Positioning
System (GPS) |
Garmin 18X-PC Geo One Phottix |
Camera |
Nikon D90 300m 2.8D fixed focus Nikon D90 20-300m zoom lens |
Laser Binocular |
Infinitor LRF 1000 |
Marine Binocular |
Bushell 7 x 50 marine binocular with compass and reticules |
Vessel for Monitoring |
65 foot single engine motor vessel with viewing platform 4.5m above
water level |
Dolphin monitoring should cover all transect lines in
Northeast Lantau (NEL) and the Northwest Lantau (NWL) survey areas twice per
month throughout the entire construction period. The monitoring data should be compatible
with, and should be made available for, long-term studies of small cetacean
ecology in Hong Kong. In order to
provide a suitable long-term dataset for comparison, identical methodology and
line transects employed in baseline dolphin monitoring was followed in the
impact dolphin monitoring.
The impact dolphin monitoring was carried out in the
NEL and NWL along the line transect as depicted in Figure 2.2. The co-ordinates of all transect lines are
shown in Table 2.6 below.
Table 2.6 Impact Dolphin Monitoring Line Transect Co-ordinates
The Action and Limit levels of impact dolphin
monitoring are shown in Appendix D. The Event and Action plan is presented in Appendix J.
Dolphin monitoring was carried out on 2, 11, 17 and 29
of September 2015. The dolphin
monitoring schedule for the reporting month is shown in Appendix F.
A total of 303.46 km of survey effort was collected,
with 99.0% of the total survey effort being conducted under favourable
weather conditions (ie Beaufort Sea State 3 or below
with good visibility) in September 2015.
Amongst the two areas, 115.34 km and 188.12 km of survey effort were
collected from NEL and NWL survey areas, respectively. The total survey effort conducted on primary
and secondary lines were 221.51 km and 81.95 km, respectively. The survey efforts are summarized in Appendix I.
A total of 7 groups of fifty-four Chinese White Dolphin
sightings were recorded during the two sets of surveys
in September 2015. All seven sightings
were made in NWL during the survey in September 2015. All seven sightings were made on primary
lines during on-effort search. One of
the dolphin groups was associated with an operating purse-seiner near Lung Kwu Chau.
None of the sightings was made in the
vicinity of the TM-CLKL Northern Connection Sub-sea Tunnel Section. The distribution of dolphin sightings during
the reporting month is shown in Figure 2.3.
Encounter rates of Chinese White Dolphins are deduced
from the survey effort and on-effort sighting data made under favourable conditions (Beaufort 3 or below with good
visibility) in September 2015 with the results present in Tables 2.7 and 2.8.
Table 2.7 Individual Survey Event Encounter Rates
|
Encounter rate (STG) (no. of on-effort dolphin sightings per 100 km of
survey effort) |
Encounter rate (ANI) (no. of dolphins from all on-effort sightings per
100 km of survey effort) |
|
Primary Lines Only |
Primary Lines Only |
||
NEL |
Set 1: September 2nd/11th |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Set 2: September 17th/29th |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
NWL |
Set 1: September 2nd/11th |
5.5 |
52.0 |
Set 2: September 17th/29th |
4.0 |
21.4 |
Note: Dolphin Encounter Rates
are deduced from the Two Sets of Surveys (Two Surveys in Each Set) in September
2015 in Northeast (NEL) and Northwest Lantau (NWL)
Table 2.8 Monthly Average Encounter Rates
|
Encounter rate (STG) (no. of on-effort dolphin sightings per 100
km of survey effort) |
Encounter rate (ANI) (no. of dolphins from all on-effort
sightings per 100 km of survey effort) |
||
Primary
Lines Only |
Both Primary and Secondary Lines |
Primary
Lines Only |
Both Primary and Secondary Lines |
|
Northeast Lantau |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Northwest Lantau |
4.7 |
3.7 |
36.5 |
28.7 |
Note:
Overall dolphin encounter rates (sightings per 100 km of survey effort) from
all four surveys are conducted in September 2015 on primary lines only as well
as both primary lines and secondary lines in Northeast and Northwest Lantau.
Due to monthly variation in dolphin occurrence within
the survey area, it would be more appropriate to draw conclusion on whether any
unacceptable impacts on dolphins have been detected in relation to the
construction activities of this Project in the quarterly EM&A reports,
where comparison on distribution, group size and encounter rates of dolphins
between the quarterly impact monitoring period and baseline monitoring period
will be made.
There was no dredging, reclamation
or marine sheet piling works in open waters during this reporting period.
Thus, Passive Acoustic Monitoring (PAM) and the day-time monitoring of Dolphin
Exclusion Zone (DEZ) by dolphin observers were not in effect during the
reporting period.
Site inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to
monitor the implementation of proper environmental pollution control and
mitigation measures under the Contract.
In the reporting month, five (5) site inspections were carried out on 2,
9, 16, 23 and 30 September 2015.
Key observations and recommendations during the site
inspections in this reporting period are summarized in Table 2.9.
Table 2.9 Specific Observations and Recommendations during the Weekly
Site Inspection in this Reporting Month
Inspection Date |
Observations |
Recommendations/ Remarks |
2 September
2015 |
Works
Area - Portion N-A Excess
muddy water should be cleared and bunds should be provided to avoid runoff. Noise
cover should be provided during ground breaking works and water spraying
should be applied during hydraulic breaking operation. Chemical
labels should be provided for the chemical container. Works
Area – Portion N-B Excess
muddy materials should be cleared. Works
Area – Portion N-C Chemical
containers should be stored in chemical storage area. Excess
muddy materials should be cleared. Excess
muddy water should be cleared to avoid runoff. Silt
curtain should be applied around the barge. |
Works
Area - Portion N-A The
Contractor was reminded to clear the excess muddy water and provide bunds to
avoid runoff. The
Contractor was reminded to provide noise cover during ground breaking works
and apply water spraying during hydraulic breaking operation. The
Contractor was reminded to provide chemical labels for the chemical
container. Works
Area – Portion N-B The
Contractor was reminded to clear the excess muddy materials. Works
Area – Portion N-C The
Contractor was reminded to store the chemical containers in chemical storage
area. The
Contractor was reminded to clear the excess muddy materials. The
Contractor was reminded to clear the excess muddy water to avoid runoff. The
Contractor was reminded to apply silt curtain around the barge. |
9
September 2015 |
Works
Area - Portion N-A Drip
tray should be maintained in good capacity. |
Works
Area - Portion N-A The
Contractor was reminded to clear the water inside the drip tray. |
16 September
2015 |
Works
Area - Portion N-B Water
spraying or cover should be provided to the idle stockpile in windy
condition. Works
Area – Portion N-C Site
drainage system should be maintained to prevent the washout of materials
during rainstorm. Water
leakage was observed on the pipe. |
Works
Area - Portion N-B The
Contractor was reminded to provide water spraying or partially cover on the
idle part of the stockpile. Works
Area – Portion N-C The
Contractor was reminded to clear the materials in the channels and maintain
site drainage. The
Contractor was reminded to fix the water leakage and review the location of
the water discharge point. |
23
September 2015 |
Works
Area - Portion N-B Water
inside the drip tray should be cleared. Works
Area – Portion N-A Chemical
labels should be provided to the oil drum and the oil drum should be placed
in drip tray. |
Works
Area - Portion N-B The
Contractor was reminded to clear the water inside the drip tray. Works
Area – Portion N-A The
Contractor was reminded to provide chemical labels to the oil drum and place
in drip tray. |
30
September 2015 |
Works
Area - Portion N-C Idle
stockpile should be covered. Works
Area – Portion N-B Water
spraying should be applied to cover areas where dust is likely to be created. |
Works
Area - Portion N-C The
Contractor was reminded to cover the idle stockpile. Works
Area – Portion N-B The
Contractor was reminded to provide water spraying to areas where dust is
likely to be created. |
The Contractor has rectified all of the observations
as identified during environmental site inspections in the reporting
month.
The Contractor had submitted application form for
registration as chemical waste producer under the Contract. Sufficient numbers of receptacles were
available for general refuse collection and sorting.
Wastes generated during this reporting period include
mainly construction wastes (inert and non-inert) and recyclable materials. Reference has been made to the waste flow
table prepared by the Contractor (Appendix L). The quantities of different types of wastes
are summarized in Table 2.10.
Table 2.10 Quantities of Different
Waste Generated in the Reporting Month
Month/Year |
Inert Construction Waste (a)
(tonnes) |
Imported Fill (tonnes) |
Inert Construction Waste
Re-used (tonnes) |
Non-inert Construction Waste (b)
(tonnes) |
Recyclable Materials (c) (kg) |
Chemical Wastes (kg) |
Marine Sediment (m3) |
|
Category L |
Category M (Mp
& Mf) |
|||||||
September
2015 |
9,555 |
0 |
0 |
195 |
300 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Notes: |
||||||||
(a) Inert
construction wastes include hard rock and large broken concrete, and materials
disposed as public fill. (b) Non-inert
construction wastes include general refuse disposed at landfill. (c) Recyclable
materials include metals, paper, cardboard, plastics, timber and others. |
The Contractor was advised to properly maintain on
site C&D materials and waste collection, sorting and recording system,
dispose of C&D materials and wastes at designated ground and maximize
reuse/ recycle of C&D materials and wastes.
The Contractor was also reminded to properly maintain the site tidiness
and dispose of the wastes accumulated on site regularly and properly.
For chemical waste containers, the Contractor was
reminded to treat properly and store temporarily in designated chemical waste
storage area on site in accordance with the Code of Practice on the Packaging,
Labelling and Storage of Chemical Wastes.
The status of environmental licensing and permit is
summarized in Table 2.11 below.
Table 2.11 Summary of Environmental Licensing and Permit Status
License/ Permit |
License or Permit No. |
Date of Issue |
Date of Expiry |
License/ Permit Holder |
Remarks |
Environmental
Permit |
EP-354/2009/D |
13
March 2015 |
Throughout
the Contract |
HyD |
Application for VEP on 3 March 2015 to supersede
EP-354/2009/C |
Construction
Dust Notification |
363510 |
19
August 2013 |
Throughout
the Contract |
DBJV |
- |
Chemical
Waste Registration |
5213-422-D2516-01 |
10
September 2013 |
Throughout
the Contract |
DBJV |
- |
Construction
Waste Disposal Account |
7018108 |
28
August 2013 |
Throughout
the Contract |
DBJV |
Waste disposal in Contract No. HY/2012/08 |
Waste
Water Discharge License |
WT00017707-2013 |
18
November 2013 |
30
November 2018 |
DBJV |
For site WA18 |
Waste
Water Discharge License |
WT00019248-2014 |
5
June 2014 |
30
June 2019 |
DBJV |
For site Portion N6 and Reclamation Area E |
Construction
Noise Permit |
GW-RW0350-15 |
14
July 2015 |
13
December 2015 |
DBJV |
For
site WA23 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0140-15 |
29 March 2015 |
28 September 2015 |
DBJV |
For Portion N6 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0474-15 |
29 September 2015 |
28 March 2016 |
DBJV |
For Portion N6 |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0311-15 |
20 July 2015 |
19 October 2015 |
DBJV |
For Dredging and Reclamation Works |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW0150-15 |
1 April 2015 |
30 September 2015 |
DBJV |
For GI Works at Southern Landfall |
Construction Noise Permit |
GW-RW1007-15 |
16 September 2015 |
13 March 2016 |
DBJV |
For GI Works at Southern Landfall |
Notes: |
|||||
HyD
= Highways Department DBJV
= Dragages – Bouygues Joint Venture VEP
= Variation of Environmental Permit |
In response to the site audit findings, the
Contractors carried out all corrective actions.
A summary of the Implementation Schedule of
Environmental Mitigation Measures (EMIS) is presented in Appendix C. The necessary mitigation measures relevant to
this Contract were implemented properly.
No Action Level or Limit Level exceedances were
recorded in the air quality monitoring of this reporting month.
Cumulative statistics are provided in Appendix K.
The Environmental Complaint Handling Procedure is
provided in Figure 2.4.
No environmental complaint was received in the reporting
period.
No notification of summons and prosecution were
received in the reporting period.
Statistics on complaints, notifications of summons and
successful prosecutions are summarized in Appendix K.
As informed by the Contractor, the major works for the
Project in October 2015 are summarized in Table
3.1.
Table 3.1 Construction Works to Be Undertaken in the Coming Month
Potential environmental impacts arising from the above
upcoming construction activities in the next reporting month of October 2015
are mainly associated with dust, marine ecology and waste management
issues.
The tentative schedule for environmental monitoring in
October 2015 is provided in Appendix F.
This Twenty-third Monthly EM&A Report presents
the findings of the EM&A activities undertaken during the period from 1 to
30 September 2015, in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual and the
requirements of EP-354/2009/D.
Air quality (including 1-hour TSP and 24-hour TSP) and
dolphin monitoring were carried out in this reporting month. No Action Level or Limit Level
exceedances were recorded in the air quality monitoring of this reporting
month.
A total of seven (7) groups of fifty-four (54)
Chinese White Dolphin sightings were recorded
during the two sets of surveys in September 2015. All seven sightings were made in NWL during
the two sets of surveys in September 2015.
All seven sightings were made on primary lines during on-effort
search. One of the dolphin groups was
associated with an operating purse-seiner near Lung Kwu
Chau. No unacceptable impact from the
construction activities of the TM-CLKL Northern Connection Sub-sea Tunnel
Section on Chinese White Dolphins was noticeable from general observations
during the dolphin monitoring in this reporting month.
Environmental site inspection was carried out five (5)
times in September 2015. Recommendations
on remedial actions recommended for the deficiencies identified during the site
audits were properly implemented by the Contractor.
No non-compliance event was recorded during the
reporting period.
No environmental complaint was received during the
reporting period.
No summons/ prosecution was
received during the reporting period.
The ET will keep track on the construction works to
confirm compliance of environmental requirements and the proper implementation
of all necessary mitigation measures.