|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AUES Job No.: TCS00715/14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuen Mun - Chek
Lap Kok Link
Contract No. HY/2013/12 –
Northern Connection Toll Plaza and Associated Works
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9th Quarterly Environmental
Monitoring & Audit Summary Report –
(November 2016
to January 2017)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepared
For
|
|
|
|
|
|
CRBC
and Kaden Joint Venture
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quality Index
|
|
Date
|
Reference No.
|
Prepared By
|
Certified By
|
|
27 February 2017
|
TCS00715/14/600/R0273v2
|
|
|
|
Ben
Tam
(Environmental Consultant)
|
T.W. Tam
(Environmental Team Leader)
|
|
This
report has been prepared by Action-United Environmental Services &
Consulting with all reasonable skill, care and diligence within the terms of
the Agreement with the client, incorporating our General Terms and Conditions
of Business and taking account of the resources devoted to it by agreement
with the client. We disclaim any responsibility to the client and others in
respect of any matters outside the scope of the above. This report is
confidential to the client and we accept no responsibility of whatsoever
nature to third parties to whom this report, or any part thereof, is made
known. Any such party relies upon the report at their own risk.
|
1.1.1. CRBC-Kaden
Joint Venture (hereafter “CRBC-Kaden JV”) is commissioned by the
Highways Department (HyD) as the Main Contractor of
the Contract No. HY/2013/12 – Northern
Connection Toll Plaza and Tunnel Section ((hereafter “the Contract”) and this
Contract is part of the Tuen Mun
– Chek Lap Kok Link (TM-CLK
Link Project). The TM-CLK Link
Project is a designated project under Environmental Permit number EP-354/2009/D issued on 13 March 2015. The layout Plan of the Project and the Contract are showed in Appendix A and B respectively.
1.1.2.
The construction works
of the Contract mainly include:-
a.
construction of an approximately 5.4 hectares
toll plaza and an associated footbridge;
b.
construction of associated carriageways
including approximately 0.74 kilometre land viaducts,
and an approximately 230 metres vehicular underpass
to connect the toll plaza and the roundabout at Lung Mun
Road/Lung Fu Road;
c.
site formation for the construction of the
toll plaza, including associated slope works and natural terrain hazard
mitigation measures;
d.
modification and realignment of the existing
Lung Mun Road and Lung Fu Road; and
e.
associated
waterworks, drainage, sewerage and landscaping works, etc..
1.1.3.
Action-United Environmental Services & Consulting has been commissioned as an Independent ET to implement the
relevant EM&A program in accordance
with the approved EM&A Manual, as well as the associated duties.
1.1.4.
This is the 9th Quarterly EM&A Summary Report
covering the period from 1 November 2016 to 31 January 2017.
1.2.1
The Monthly Environmental Monitoring and
Audit (EM&A) Report is structured into the following sections:-
Section 1 Introduction
Section 2 Contract
Organization and Construction Progress
Section 3 Summary
of Impact Monitoring Requirements
Section 4 Air
Quality Monitoring
Section 5 Ecology
Monitoring
Section 6 Cultural
Heritage
Section 7 Landscape
and Visual
Section 8 Landfill
gas hazard Monitoring
Section 9 Waste
Management
Section 10 Site Inspections
Section 11 Environmental
Complaints and Non-Compliance
Section 12 Implementation
Status of Mitigation Measures
Section 13 Conclusions
and Recommendations
2.1.1
The Contract organization and contact details
of key personnel are shown in Appendix C.
2.2.1
In the Reporting Period, the major
construction activity conducted under the Contract is summarized in below. Moreover, the master construction
program and 2-month rolling programme is enclosed in Appendix D.
November 2016
Ÿ
Instrumentation and Monitoring
Ÿ
Site Formation – Earthwork on Slope D and E;
surface drainage on Slope C, D & E and Portion H;
Ÿ
Toll Plaza Decking and TD2;
Ÿ
Toll Plaza Footbridge;
Ÿ
Retaining Structure RW_A, RW_B and RW_F;
Ÿ
Toll Collector Subway & Associated Works;
Ÿ
Bridge G1, G2 and Bridge H1 by Form Traveller;
Ÿ
Sewer Culvert at FC1 and FC2;
Ÿ
Waterproofing and lining at Vehicular Underpass
Ÿ
Road and Drainage Works at +11mPD, +19mPD and
Portion H
December 2016
Ÿ
Instrumentation and Monitoring
Ÿ
Site Formation – Earthwork on Slope D and E;
surface drainage on Slope C, D & E and Portion H;
Ÿ
Toll Plaza Decking and TD2;
Ÿ
Toll Plaza Footbridge;
Ÿ
Retaining Structure RW_A, RW_B and RW_F;
Ÿ
Toll Collector Subway & Associated Works;
Ÿ
Bridge G1, G2 and Bridge H1 by Form Traveller;
Ÿ
Sewer Culvert at FC1 and FC2;
Ÿ
Waterproofing and lining at Vehicular Underpass
Ÿ
Road and Drainage Works at +11mPD, +19mPD and
Portion H
January 2017
Ÿ
Instrumentation and Monitoring
Ÿ
Site Formation – Earthwork on Slope D and E;
surface drainage on Slope C, D & E and Portion H;
Ÿ
Toll Plaza Decking and TD2;
Ÿ
Toll Plaza Footbridge;
Ÿ
Retaining Structure RW_A, RW_B and RW_F;
Ÿ
Toll Collector Subway & Associated Works;
Ÿ
Bridge G1, G2 and Bridge H1 by Form Traveller;
Ÿ
Sewer Culvert at FC1 and FC2;
Ÿ
Waterproofing and lining at Vehicular Underpass
Ÿ
Road and Drainage Works at +11mPD, +19mPD and
Portion H
2.3 Summary of Environmental Submissions
2.3.1
In according to the EP, the required documents
have submitted to EPD for retention which listed in below:
Ÿ
Monitoring Plan on Construction Dust
(submission refer to Contract HY/2012/08)
Ÿ
Landscape and Visual Plan (not yet endorsed by EPD)
Ÿ
Waste Management Plan (endorsed by EPD on 16 March 2015)
Ÿ
Baseline Monitoring Report (not yet endorsed
by EPD)
2.3.2
Summary of
the relevant permits, licenses, and/or notifications on environmental
protection for Contract No. HY/2013/12 are presented
in Table 2-1.
Table 2-1 Status of
Environmental Licenses and Permits of the Contracts
|
No.
|
Type of Permit/
License
|
Submission Date
|
Reference/
License No.
|
Date of Issue
|
Date of Expiry
|
|
1
|
Air pollution Control (Construction Dust)
Regulation
|
06-08-2014
|
377719
|
06-08-2014
|
N/A
|
|
2
|
Chemical Waste Producer Registration -
Waste Producers Number
|
06-08-2014
|
5117422C389301
|
03-09-2014
|
N/A
|
|
3
|
Variation of Effluent Discharge License
|
22-08-15
|
WT00023973-2016
|
14-03-16
|
30-09-2019
|
|
4
|
Waste Disposal Regulation - Billing Account
for Disposal of Construction Waste
|
21-07-2014
|
7020460
|
01-08-2014
|
N/A
|
|
5
|
CNP for Multiple Task
|
21-04-2016
|
GW-RW0520-16
|
05-05-2016
|
04-11-2016
|
|
6
|
Extend CNP for Multiple Task
|
18-10-2016
|
GW-RW0619-16
|
05-11-2016
|
04-05-2017
|
|
7
|
CNP for MH5
|
25-04-2016
|
GW-RW0563-16
|
18-05-2016
|
17-11-2016
|
|
8
|
Extend CNP for MH5
|
1-11-2016
|
GW-RW0650-16
|
18-11-2016
|
17-05-2017
|
|
9
|
CNP for Tunnel works
|
25-04-2016
|
GW-RW0582-16
|
23-05-2016
|
22-11-2016
|
|
10
|
Extent CNP for Tunnel Works
|
3-11-2016
|
GW-RW0653-16
|
23-11-2016
|
22-05-2017
|
|
11
|
CNP for Flasework Erection
|
27-07-2016
|
GW-RW0472-16
|
22-08-2016
|
21-12-2016
|
|
12
|
Extend CNP for Flasework Erection
|
01-12-2016
|
GW-RW0724-16
|
28-12-2016
|
16-03-2017
|
|
13
|
CNP for Portion H
Roundabout
|
21-11-2016
|
GW-RW0704-16
|
06-12-2016
|
21-02-2017
|
3.1.1
The major construction activities under the
Contract are land-based and no marine work will be involved. In accordance with the Project EM&A
Manual requirements, the environmental aspects under the Contract shall be included
air quality, ecological, cultural heritage, landscape and visual, landfill gas and
site inspection during construction period. In addition, audit of the contractor’s
implementation of the construction noise and land-based water quality pollution
control measures are also required for the Contract.
3.1.2
A summary of construction phase EM&A
requirements are presented in the
sub-sections below.
3.2.1
The construction phase air quality monitoring
shall cover the following parameters:
•
1-hour TSP; and
•
24-hour TSP
3.3.1
The air quality
monitoring stations for impact monitoring are listed in Table 3-1
and illustrated in Appendix E.
Table
3-1 Air
Quality Monitoring Stations under the Contract
|
ID
|
Location
|
Air monitoring station
Description
|
|
ASR1
|
Tuen Mun Fireboat Station
|
EM&A Manual
|
|
ASR5
|
Pillar Point Fire Station
|
EM&A Manual
|
|
AQMS1
|
Previous River Trade Golf
|
Enhanced TSP Level under EP condition 2.4
|
|
ASR6
|
Butterfly Beach Laundry
|
Enhanced TSP Level under EP condition 2.4
|
|
ASR10
|
Butterfly Beach Park
|
Enhanced TSP Level under EP condition 2.4
|
3.4.1
As per Condition 2.4 of the EP of TM-CLKL, an
enhanced monitoring plan on TSP level at Tuen Mun (“the Enhanced TSP Monitoring Plan”) is required to be
submitted to the DEP for approval at least 1 month before the commencement of
construction of the Project. Details
of the Enhanced TSP Monitoring Plan under Contract No. HY/2012/08 could be
found from the project website. The air quality monitoring work under this
Contract will follow the monitoring requirement of enhanced TSP monitoring
under the project.
3.4.2
The air quality monitoring requirements for
the Contract is summarized in Table 3-2.
Table
3-2 Enhanced
TSP Monitoring Plan – Construction Phase
|
Condition
|
Monitoring Parameter
|
Monitoring Location
|
Frequency
|
Monitoring Requirement
|
|
General
|
1-hour TSP
|
ASR1, ASR5, AQMS1, ASR6, ASR10
|
3 times per day every
six days
|
Throughout the
Northern Connection, toll plaza and tunnel buildings construction works
|
|
24-hour TSP
|
ASR1, ASR5, AQMS1, ASR6, ASR10
|
Daily every six days
|
|
Special
|
1-hour TSP
|
ASR1, ASR5, AQMS1, ASR6, ASR10
|
3 times per day every
three days
|
Northern Connection
During excavation
works for launching shaft, excavation work for Cut and Cover Tunnel and Cut
and Cover Tunnel Construction
Toll Plaza
During excavation,
slope works, construction of road and superstructures and wind erosion from
open sites and stockpiling areas
Tunnel Buildings
During excavation,
foundation works, construction of superstructures and wind erosion from open
sites and stockpiling areas
|
|
24-hour TSP
|
ASR1, ASR5, AQMS1, ASR6, ASR10
|
Daily every three days
|
3.5.1
The 24-hour and 1-hour TSP levels shall be
measured by following the standard high volume sampling method as set out in
the Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Chapter 1 (Part 50), Appendix B.
3.5.2
The filter paper of 24-hour TSP measurement
shall be determined by HOKLAS accredited laboratory. A high volume sampler in
compliance with the following specifications shall be used for carrying out the
1-hr and 24-hr TSP monitoring:
(i)
0.6-1.7 m3/min (20-60
SCFM) adjustable flow range;
(ii)
equipped with a
timing/control device with +/- 5 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
(iii)
installed with
elapsed-time meter with +/- 2 minutes accuracy for 24 hours operation;
(iv)
capable of providing a
minimum exposed area of 406 cm2 (63 in2);
(v)
flow control accuracy:
+/- 2.5% deviation over 24-hr sampling period;
(vi)
equipped with a shelter
to protect the filter and sampler;
(vii) incorporated with an electronic mass flow rate controller or other
equivalent devices;
(viii) equipped with a flow recorder for continuous monitoring;
(ix)
provided with a peaked roof
inlet;
(x)
equipped with a
manometer;
(xi)
able to hold and seal
the filter paper to the sampler housing in a horizontal position;
(xii) easy to change the filter; and
(xiii) capable of operating
continuously for 24-hr period.
3.5.3
Calibration of dust monitoring equipment
shall be conducted by the ET upon installation and in bi-monthly intervals
during construction phase. The
transfer standard shall be traceable to the internationally recognized primary
standard and be calibrated annually. The calibration data shall be properly
documented for future reference by concerned parties, such as the IEC. All the
data shall be converted into standard temperature and pressure condition.
3.5.4
The filter paper of 24-hour TSP measurement
shall be determined by HOKLAS accredited laboratory.
3.5.5
If the ET proposes to use a direct reading
dust meter to measure 1-hr TSP levels on an ad hoc basis, he shall submit
sufficient information to the IEC to prove that the instrument is capable of achieving
a comparable result as that the High Volume Sampler (HVS) and may be used for
the 1-hr sampling. The instrument
should also be calibrated regularly and the 1-hr sampling shall be checked
periodically by the HVS to check the validity and accuracy of the results
measured by the direct reading method.
3.5.6
According to the Project EM&A Manual,
wind data monitoring equipment shall also be provided and set up for logging
wind speed and wind direction near the dust monitoring locations. The equipment installation location
shall be proposed by the ET and agreed with the IEC. For installation and operation of wind
data monitoring equipment, the following points shall be observed:
(i)
the wind sensors should
be installed on masts at an elevated level 10 m above ground so that they are
clear of obstructions or turbulence caused by the buildings;
(ii)
the wind data should be
captured by a data logger to be down-loaded for processing at least once a
month;
(iii)
the wind data monitoring
equipment should be re-calibrated at least once every six months; and
(iv)
wind direction should be
divided into 16 sectors of 22.5 degrees each.
3.6.1
The baseline monitoring results formed the
basis for determining the air quality criteria for the impact monitoring. The
ET shall compare the impact monitoring results with air quality criteria set up
for 24-hour TSP and 1-hour TSP.
Based on results of the approved Baseline Monitoring Report of HyD Contract HY/2012/08, the Action and Limit Levels for
impact dust monitoring are shown in Tables 3-3.
Table 3-3 Action and Limit Levels for Impact Air
Quality Monitoring
|
Air Quality Monitoring Stations
|
24-hour TSP (μg/m3)
|
1-hour TSP (μg/m3)
|
|
Action Level
|
Limit Level
|
Action Level
|
Limit Level
|
|
ASR1
|
213
|
260
|
331
|
500
|
|
ASR5
|
238
|
260
|
340
|
500
|
|
AQMS1
|
213
|
260
|
335
|
500
|
|
ASR6
|
238
|
260
|
338
|
500
|
|
ASR10
|
214
|
260
|
337
|
500
|
3.6.2
Should non-compliance of the environmental
quality criteria occurs, remedial actions will be triggered according to the
Event and Action Plan which presented in Appendix F.
Noise
3.7.1
The TM-CLKL EIA study stated that no existing
noise sensitive receiver (NSR) was identified within the Study Area at Tuen Mun. Therefore, no noise monitoring is
required for the construction phase of the Contract.
3.7.2
Regular site inspections and audits will be
carried out during the construction phase in order to confirm the construction
works under the Contract comply with the regulatory noise requirements.
Water Quality
3.7.3
No marine works will be undertaken under the Contract. Therefore, no water quality monitoring
is required for the construction phase of the Contract.
Ecology
3.7.4
No marine works will be undertaken under the Contract
and generated marine ecological impact, no dolphin monitoring is required for
the construction phase of the Contract.
3.7.5
During construction phase, the ET will
perform Pitcher Plants inspection at least once every week to report the growth
condition (only undertaken at Establish
period) and protection measures.
Landscape and Visual
3.7.6
Measures to mitigate landscape and visual
impact during construction should be checked and monitored by a Registered
Landscape Architect to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the
mitigation measures in accordance with the EM&A Manual.
Cultural Heritage
3.7.7
Grave G1 as a heritage resource is situated
near the proposed toll plaza in Tuen Mun. Site
inspections should be undertaken at least once per week throughout the
construction period to ensure compliance with the intended aims of recommended
mitigation measures.
Landfill Gas
3.7.8
During EIA study, landfill gas hazards are likely
to be generated from the Pillar Point Valley (PPV) Landfill. Landfill gas monitoring is recommended
during construction of the Contract to ensure the works area is free of
landfill gas before the worker entered the concerned area.
4.1.1
The air quality impact monitoring and enhanced
Total Suspended Particulates (TSP) level monitoring at five proposed locations
are currently carried out by the ET of Contract HY/2012/08. Sharing of impact air quality monitoring
data between HY/2012/08 and HY/2013/12 is agreed by all relevant parties. The Contract is not required to conduct
its own dust monitoring exercise until the Contract HY/2012/08 ends.
4.2.1
In the Reporting Period, 1- hour and
24-hour TSP monitoring at the five proposed locations are continued to perform by
the ET of Contract HY/2012/08. Therefore,
no air quality monitoring was conducted by the ET of Contract HY/2013/12. Details information of air quality
monitoring results could be referred to the Monthly EM&A Reports of the
Contract HY /2012 /08 (November 2016, December 2016 and January 2017).
4.3.1
According to the air quality monitoring
result provided by Contract HY/2012/08, no exceedances in 1-hour and 24-hour
TSP were recorded in the Reporting Period.
No Notification on Exceedances (NOEs) was issued by the ET of Contract
HY/2012/08. The summary of air
quality exceedance in the Reporting Period is shown in Table 4-1.
Table 4-1 Summary of Air Quality Monitoring Exceedance
|
Date of Exceedance
|
Monitoring Station
|
Air Quality Parameter
|
Result
|
Exceed
|
|
NA
|
NA
|
NA
|
--
|
--
|
4.4.1
No investigation for
exceedance is required for the Reporting Period.
5.1.1
According to the EM&A Manual
requirements, regularly
inspection for Pitcher Plants at least once every week to report it growth and protection
measure
situation shall be conducted during construction period.
5.2.1
Total 181 pitcher plants were transplanted to
finial receptor site and the rest of the Pitcher Plant individuals (certified
dead by the specialist) were not transplanted and were treated as general
refuse. All the transplantation of pitcher plant from the nursery site to final
receptor site was completed on 10th September 2015.
5.2.2
In the Reporting Period, inspections for
implementation status of mitigation measures for the Pitcher Plants were
carried out by the ET on 1st, 8th,
15th, 22nd, 29th November 2016, 6th, 13th, 20th, 28th December 2016, 3rd, 10th, 17th and 24th January 2017.
5.2.3
Establish
period for the pitcher plants was completed at the end of September 2016, the
join site completion of establish period visit with AFCD was undertaken on 23
September 2016 and the final pitcher plants report was submitted to AFCD on early December
2016. Therefore after 23 September 2016, only the integrity of the protection
fence was checked to fulfill the EIA requirement. During each inspection, the protection
mitigation measures were
checking at the final receptor area to make sure no site activities was
undertaken inside the protection zone. Besides, no construction activities were observed to be carried
out at the surrounding of the final receptor area. The condition of chain link fence is
good and no repair or maintenance is required.
5.2.4
No matters the completion of establish period, the
Contractor should properly maintain the fencing along the receptor area to
avoid disturbance to the pitcher plants under the EIA requirement.
6.1.1
According to the EM&A Manual requirements,
regular inspection for heritage resource, Grave G1, shall be audited by the ET
at least once every week to ensure recommended mitigation measures implemented
during construction period. The aim of the survey is to prevent any possible
damage to the grave and to ensure the proposed mitigation measures are
implemented. The broad scope of the
audit will involve supervision of the following:
Ÿ
Non-contact effects of
the engineering works, such as vibration from pneumatic drills which could cause
damage, such as foundation or wall cracks and loosening of tiles or fixtures;
and
Ÿ
Contact between the
historic structures and equipment and materials associated with the engineering
works.
6.1.2
Specifically, the monitoring programme will entail the following tasks:
Ÿ
The extent of the agreed
works areas should be regularly checked during the construction phase to ensure
the buffer is being maintained; and
Ÿ
Ensure no stockpiling or
equipment storage is affecting the structure.
6.1.3
In the event of non-compliance the
responsibilities of the relevant parties is detailed in the Event/ Action Plan
in Appendix F.
6.2.1
In the Reporting Period, site inspection for
the Grave G1 was undertaken on 1st, 8th,
15th, 22nd, 29th November 2016, 6th, 13th, 20th, 28th December 2016, 3rd, 10th, 17th and 24th January 2017. During
these inspections, buffer zone was maintained between the working area and the
Grave. The nearby areas were clean,
and no construction materials or mechanical equipment were stored within or
close to the buffer zone.
6.2.2
Accordingly, the Contractor has had fully
implemented cultural heritage mitigation measures in accordance with the
EM&A Manual requirements.
7
Landscpae and Visual
7.1.1
According to EM&A Manual requirements,
monitoring of Contractor’s operations during construction period to report on
Contractor’s compliance should be carried out on weekly basis. Measure to mitigate landscape and visual
impact during construction should be checked and monitored by a Registered
Landscape Architect to ensure compliance with the intended aims of the
mitigation measures. Moreover, the
progress of the engineering works shall be regularly reviewed on site to
identify the earliest practical opportunities for the landscape works to be
undertaken.
7.2.1
In the Reporting Period, site inspection for
landscape and visual mitigation measures was undertaken by the Registered
Landscape Architect on 4th, 11th,
18nd, 25th November 2016, 2nd, 9th, 16th,
23th, 30th December 2016, 6th, 13th, 20th and 27th January 2017.
7.2.2
Most of the landscape works such as planting
was not yet commenced. The detailed
inspection checklists can be referred to the Monthly EM&A Reports (November 2016, December 2016 and January
2017) of
the contract.
8.1 General
8.1.1
During EIA study, landfill gas hazards are likely
to be generated from the Pillar Point Valley (PPV) Landfill. Hence, regular
landfill gas monitoring is recommended during construction of the proposed toll
plaza.
8.1.2
During construction, a Safety Officer should
be appointed to carry out the monitoring works. The monitoring frequency and
areas to be monitored should be set down prior to commencement of ground-works
either by the Safety Officer or an approved and appropriated qualified person.
The routine monitoring should be carried out in all excavations, manholes,
chambers, relocation of monitoring wells and any other confined spaces that may
have been created. All measurements in excavations should be made with the
extended monitoring tube located not more than 10 mm from the exposed ground
surface. Monitoring should be performed properly to make sure that the area is
free of landfill gas before any man enters in the area.
8.1.3
For excavations deeper than 1m, measurements
should be carried out:
Ÿ
at the ground surface
before excavation commences;
Ÿ
immediately before any
worker enters the excavation;
Ÿ
at the beginning of each
working day for the entire period the excavation remains open; and
Ÿ
periodically through the working day whilst workers are in the excavation.
8.1.4
For excavations between 300mm and 1m deep,
measurements should be carried out:
Ÿ
directly after the
excavation has been completed; and
Ÿ
periodically whilst the
excavation remains open
8.1.5
For excavations less than 300mm deep,
monitoring may be omitted, at the discretion of the Safety Officer or other
appropriately qualified person.
8.1.6
To ensure the accuracy of the monitoring
data, zeroing of the gas analyser shall be undertaken
at the start of each day’s monitoring.
As part of the QA/QC, calibration of the gas analyser
shall be conducted at least once every two weeks according to the specification
of the manufacturer’s operation manual.
8.1.7
The landfill consultation zone was divided
into 6 monitoring zones. The landfill gas monitoring zones are summarized in Table
8-1 and the layout plan for the monitoring zone is illustrated in Appendix E.
Table 8-1 Landfill
Gas Monitoring Zone
|
ID
|
Location
|
Excavation >300mm deep
undertaken in this reporting period
|
|
TD1
|
TD1, Retaining Wall A and Subway
|
Yes
|
|
RW-B
|
Retaining Wall B
|
No
|
|
RW-F
|
Retaining Wall F
|
No
|
|
S&U
|
Slope and Underpass
|
No
|
|
BW
|
Bridge Works
|
No
|
|
LMR
|
Lung Mun Road
|
Yes
|
8.2.1
In the Reporting Period, landfill gas monitoring was conducted at the zone TD1 and LMR which have excavation works was undertaking. A BIOGAS
5000 gas analyser was used for the landfill gas
monitoring.
8.2.2
There were total 73 workings days monitoring
were carried by the Safety Officer or an approved and qualified persons in this
reporting period. Table 8-2 is summarized landfill gas measurement results. Moreover, graphical plot are attached in
Appendix G.
Table 8-2 Summary of
Landfill Gas Measurement Results
in Reporting Period
|
Landfill Gas Parameter
|
Action
Level
|
Limit
Level
|
Detectable at TD1
|
Detectable at LMR
|
|
Min
|
Max
|
Min
|
Max
|
|
Methane
|
>10% LEL (>0.5%
v/v)
|
>20% LEL (>1% v/v)
|
0.1%
|
0.1%
|
0.1%
|
0.1%
|
|
Oxygen
|
<19%
|
<18%
|
21.0%
|
21.1%
|
21.0%
|
21.1%
|
|
Carbon Dioxide
|
>0.5%
|
>1.5%
|
0.1%
|
0.2%
|
0.1%
|
0.2%
|
8.2.3
The measurement results shown that slightly
methane concentration was detected and all oxygen concentration was over 21.0%
and Carbon Dioxide was between 0.1 and 0.2 %. No corrective action was required
accordingly.
9.1 General
Waste Management
9.1.1
Waste management was carried out by an on-site
Environmental Officer or an Environmental Supervisor from time to time.
9.2.1
All types of waste arising from the
construction work are classified into the following:
l Construction
& Demolition (C&D) Material;
l Chemical
Waste;
l General
Refuse; and
l Excavated
Soil.
9.2.2
Whenever possible, materials were reused
on-site as far as practicable. The
quantities of waste for disposal in the Reporting Period are summarized in Tables
9-1 and 9-2 and the Waste Flow Table is presented in Appendix H.
Table 9-1 Summary
of Quantities of Inert C&D Materials
|
Type of Waste
|
Quantity
|
Disposal
Location
|
|
Nov 16
|
Dec 16
|
Jan 17
|
|
Reused in this
Project (Inert) (in '000 m3)
|
4.890
|
7.858
|
4.543
|
-
|
|
Reused in other
Projects (Inert) (in '000 m3)
|
15.424
|
9.131
|
7.512
|
• Lam Tei Quarry
• Eco Park
K.wah Recycle Facilities
• Lung Kwu Tan Tailor Recycled Aggregates
• Laintang BCP
• TM-CLKL
C2
|
|
Disposal as Public
Fill (Inert) (in '000 m3)
|
1.207
|
0.762
|
1.062
|
Tuen Mum Area 38
|
Table 9-2 Summary
of Quantities of C&D Wastes
|
Type of Waste
|
Quantity
|
Disposal Location
|
|
Nov 16
|
Dec 16
|
Jan 17
|
|
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
|
Recycled
Paper / Cardboard Packaging (in '000kg)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
|
Recycled
Plastic (in '000kg)
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
|
Chemical
Wastes (in '000kg)
|
0.030
|
0
|
0
|
-
|
|
General
Refuses (in '000m3)
|
0.175
|
0.119
|
0.217
|
WENT
|
9.2.3
To control the site performance on waste management, the
Contractor shall ensure that all solid and liquid waste management works are
fully in compliance with the relevant license/permit requirements, such as the
effluent discharge license and the chemical waste producer registration. The Contractor is also reminded to
implement the recommended environmental mitigation measures according to the Environmental Monitoring and Audit
Manual.
10.1 requirements
10.1.1
According to the approved EM&A Manual,
the environmental site inspection shall be formulation by ET Leader. Weekly environmental site inspections should
carry out to confirm the environmental performance.
10.1.2
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken to evaluate the site
environmental performance. The
summaries of the findings during site inspection are presented in Tables
10-1 and 10-2.
Table
10-1 Site Observations for the Contract for
the Reporting Period
|
Date
|
Findings /
Deficiencies
|
Follow-Up Status
|
|
1 November 2016
|
Ÿ Several empty oil buckets were observed on the working area,the
Contractor should clean them up in accordance with the WMP requirement.
|
Ÿ Empty oil buckets were disposed.
|
|
Ÿ Free standing chemical bottle was observed on site without drip tray.
The Contractor is required to remove it from site or provide drip tray.
|
Ÿ Free standing chemical container without drip tray was removed.
|
|
Ÿ The Contractor is reminded to improve housekeeping and also recommended
to provide garbage bins on site to maintain site cleanliness.
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
Ÿ Regular waste disposal of C&D waste is reminded.
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
Ÿ Dust mitigation measures is reminded to be enhanced as the dry season
has come.
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
8 November 2016
|
Ÿ Oil drum without drip tray was observed. Drip tray should be provided
for all chemical containers storage on site. (Workshop area near retaining
wall B)
|
Ÿ Drip tray was provided for the oil drum.
|
|
Ÿ During dry season, dust control mitigation measures frequency should be
increased to reduce dust impact.
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
15 November 2016
|
Ÿ During dry
season, dust mitigation measures frequency for haul road or dusty activities
should be increased to reduce dust generation. (Slope area & haul road)
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
22 November 2016
|
Ÿ Heavy dust emitted from soil nail works was observed. Proper dust
control measure should be provided to reduce dust impact. (Slope E)
|
Ÿ No dust emitted from soil nail works was observed and water spraying was
provided for the drilling works when operation.
|
|
Ÿ Cement grouting works without shelter was observed. Three sides plus top
shelter should be provided. (Slope E)
|
Ÿ Shelter was provided for the cement grouting works.
|
|
29 November 2016
|
Ÿ Nil
|
Ÿ NA
|
|
6 December 2016
|
Ÿ
Exposed slope near the
stream should be covered to prevent contaminate surface run-off. (Stream B)
|
Ÿ
Tarpaulin sheets was
covered at the slope near the stream.
|
|
13 December 2016
|
Ÿ
NRMM label are missing for
the plants was observed. NRMM label should be displayed properly for NRMM
using on site. (Lung Mun Road Roundabout road surfacing works)
|
Ÿ
Plants without NRMM label
were moved from site.
|
|
Ÿ Empty chemical bucket cumulated on site should be disposed
frequency. (MH7)
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
20 December 2016
|
Ÿ
Tree protection zone broken
was observed. Proper maintenance for the tree protection zone should be
provided. (Slope 16)
|
Ÿ
Broken tree protection zone
was repaired.
|
|
28 December 2016
|
Ÿ
Stagnant water cumulated
inside the drip tray should be removed to maintain the capacity of the drip
tray. (Near Retaining Wall B)
|
Ÿ
Stagnant water cumulated
inside the drip tray was cleared.
|
|
3 January 2017
|
Ÿ Chemical containers without
drip tray storage on site was observed. Drip tray should be provided for all chemical storage on
site. (MH 7)
|
Ÿ Drip tray was provided for storage chemical on
site.
|
|
Ÿ During dry season, water spraying frequency
should be increased to minimize dust generation. (Haul Road)
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
10 January 2017
|
Ÿ Dusty haul road was observed. Proper dust
mitigations measures should be provided to reduce dust generation during dry
season. (Retaining Wall B)
|
Ÿ Water spraying and cleaning of dusty material was
observed to reduce dust impact.
|
|
Ÿ Stockpile of empty chemical buckets cumulated on
site was observed. The contractor was reminded to clean more frequency.
(Retaining Wall B)
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
17 January 2017
|
Ÿ Chemical containers without
drip tray was
observed. Drip tray should be provided for all chemical storage on site. (Toll
Collector Subway)
|
Ÿ Chemical container without drip tray was removed.
|
|
Ÿ Water spraying should be provided for breaking
and drilling activities to reduce dust generation. (Platform 19)
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
Ÿ Dark smoke emitted from the excavator was
observed, proper maintenance should be provided. (Cascade D)
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
|
24 January 2017
|
Ÿ Explosed surface near the stream should be covered to
prevent contaminate surface runoff. (Stream B)
|
Ÿ Not required for reminder.
|
Table 10-2 Summary of Reminders/Observations
of Site Inspection
|
Reporting Period
|
Date of site inspection
|
Nos. of findings / reminders
|
Follow-Up Status
|
|
November 2016
|
1st, 8th, 15th,
22nd and 29th November 2016
|
10
|
Completed
|
|
December
2016
|
6th, 13th, 20th
and 28th December 2016
|
5
|
Completed
|
|
January 2017
|
3rd, 10th, 17th
and 24th January 2017
|
8
|
Completed
|
10.1.3
In the
Reporting Period, no non-compliance was recorded,
however, 23
observations/ reminders were recorded during the site inspections. Minor deficiencies found in the weekly site inspection were in general
rectified within the specified deadlines.
The environmental performance of the Project was therefore considered
satisfactory.
Inspection Checklist for Vulnerable to Contaminated Water Discharge
10.1.4
Following to the complaint about
discharge of milky water to Bufferfly Beach on 2 September 2015. The Contractor proposed to carry out
daily inspection of wastewater treatment facilities, concerned discharge
points, drainage inlets and outlets during typhoon or wet season.
10.1.5
In addition, specific inspections
would also be conducted before and after adverse weather to ensure necessary
remedial works would be carried out timely. Should incidental contaminated
water discharge be found at the inlet of the associated drainage system, a
specific inspection of the relevant drainage pipes would be conducted for
traces of deposit, and follow up actions would be taken when necessary.
10.1.6
The daily inpsection for vulnerable
to contaminated water discharge was temporarily suspended from 30 November 2016 during the
dry season and will be resumed at wet season or after the rainstorm warnings. As
requested by the EPD, the associated inspection checklists of the reporting
peroid were presented in the Monthly EM&A Report – November 2016.
11.1
Environmental Complaint, Summons and Prosecution
11.1.1 In the Reporting Period, no
environmental complaint, summons and prosecution under the EM&A Programme was lodged.
Moreover, no exceedance of the environmental performance (Action / Limit
Levels) was recorded for monitoring programme.-
11.1.2 During the
complaint investigation work, the Contractor was co-operated with the ET in
providing all the necessary information and assistance for completion of the
investigation. Investigation report
(IR) for the complaint has been conducted by the ET and agreed by the IEC. It was concluded that the complaint was
not related to the works under the Contract.
11.1.3 The
statistical summary table of environmental exceedance, complaint, summons and
prosecution is presented in Tables 11-1, 11-2, 11-3 and 11-4.
Table 11-1 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Exceedance
|
Reporting Period
|
Environmental Aspect / Parameter
|
Environmental Performance
|
Event
Exceedance
|
|
Reporting
Period
|
Previous
Periods
|
Cumulative
|
|
1 February
2016 –
31 January 2017
|
Air Quality - 1-hr TSP
|
Action Level
|
0
|
4
|
4
|
|
Limit Level
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Air Quality - 24-hr
TSP
|
Action Level
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Limit Level
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Table 11-2 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Complaints
|
Reporting Period
|
Environmental Complaint Statistics
|
|
Frequency
|
Cumulative
|
Complaint Nature
|
|
23 October 2014 –
31 October 2016
|
1
|
7
|
Water (6), Air
(1)
|
|
1 November 2016 –
31 January 2017
|
0
|
7
|
Water (6), Air
(1)
|
Table
11-3 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Summons
|
Reporting Period
|
Environmental Summons Statistics
|
|
Frequency
|
Cumulative
|
Complaint Nature
|
|
23 October 2014 –
31 October 2016
|
0
|
0
|
NA
|
|
1 November 2016 –
31 January 2017
|
0
|
0
|
NA
|
Table
11-4 Statistical
Summary of Environmental Prosecution
|
Reporting Period
|
Environmental Prosecution Statistics
|
|
Frequency
|
Cumulative
|
Complaint Nature
|
|
23 October 2014 –
31 October 2016
|
0
|
0
|
NA
|
|
1 November 2016 –
31 January 2017
|
0
|
0
|
NA
|
12.1 General
Requirements
12.1.1
The environmental mitigation measures that
recommended in the Environmental Mitigation and Enhancement Measures
Implementation Schedule (EMIS) for in the Project EM&A Manual covered the
issues of air quality, cultural heritage, ecology, landfill gas hazard, landscape & visual,
noise, water and waste. The
updated EMIS for the Contract is shown in Appendix I.
12.1.2
The Contractor shall implement the required
environmental mitigation measures according to the EM&A Manual as subject
to the site condition. The environmental mitigation measures implemented by the
Contract in this Reporting Period are summarized in Table 12-1 and Appendix I.
Table 12-1 Environmental
Mitigation Measures
|
Issues
|
Environmental Mitigation Measures
|
|
Air Quality
|
· Maintain damp / wet surface
on access road
· Keep slow speed in the sites
· All vehicles must use wheel
washing facility before off site
· Sprayed water during rock
breaking works
· During transportation by truck, materials loaded lower
than the side and tail boards, and covered before transport
· Compacted all soil stockpiles
· Part of the exposed slopes covered geotextile net
|
|
Cultural Heritage
|
· Set a buffer zone between the working area
and the Grave
· All construction materials and equipment store far from
the Grave
· Inspection the Grave to ensure provision mitigation
measures effective
|
|
Ecology
|
·
Wire fencing provided
for temporary protect Pitcher Plants
·
Undertake weekly
inspection of Pitcher Plants
|
|
Landfill Gas Hazard
|
·
Landfill Gas
measurement undertake during trench excavation
|
|
Water Quality
|
· Temporary drainage system
provide for surface runoff prevent discharge to public area
· Wastewater to be treated by
sedimentation tank before discharge.
|
|
Noise
|
· Restrain operation time of
plants from 07:00 to 19:00 on any working day except for Public Holiday and
Sunday.
· Keep good maintenance of
plants
· The noisy plants or works
provide mobile noise barriers
· Shut down the plants when
not in used
|
|
Waste and Chemical
Management
|
· On-site sorting prior to
disposal
· Follow requirements and
procedures of the “Trip-ticket System”
·
Predict required quantity of concrete accurately
· Collect the unused fresh concrete at designated
locations in the sites for subsequent disposal
|
|
General
|
· The site was generally kept
tidy and clean.
|
13.1 Conclusions
13.1.1 This is 9th Quarterly EM&A
report presenting the monitoring results and inspection findings for the
Reporting Period from 1 November to 31 January 2017.
13.1.2 No air
quality monitoring including 1-hour and 24-hour TSP exceedance was recorded in
the Reporting Period.
13.1.3 In this
Reporting Period, no noise complaint was
received by RE, the Contractor, ENPO or HyD. No Action Level exceedances were triggered and no NOE or the associated corrective actions were therefore issued.
13.1.4 Site
inspection for landscape and visual was conducted on weekly basis by the
Landscape Architect to ensure the compliance of the intended aims of the
mitigation measures. Most of the
landscape works such as planting was not yet commenced.
13.1.5 Establish period for
the pitcher plants was completed at the end of September 2016, the join site
completion of establish period visit with AFCD was undertaken on 23 September
2016 and the final pitcher plants report was submitted to AFCD on early December 2016. Therefore after 23 September 2016, only the
integrity of the protection fence was checked to fulfil the EIA requirement. During
each inspection, the protection mitigation
measures were checking at the final receptor area to make sure no site
activities was undertaken inside the protection zone. Besides, no construction activities were observed to
be carried out at the surrounding of the final receptor area. The condition of chain link fence is
good and no repair or maintenance is required.
13.1.6 Landfill
gas monitoring was conducted at
the TD1 and Lung Mun Road works area by the Safety Officer. The monitoring results shown no exceedances
were triggered.
13.1.7 In the Reporting Period, no environmental
complaint was received.
13.1.8
No notifications of summons, or
successful prosecution were received by the Contractor during the Reporting
Period.
13.1.9
During
the Reporting Period, 13
events of the joint site inspections were undertaken to evaluate the site
environmental performance. No non-compliance of environmental
impacts were observed, indicating the implemented
mitigation measures for air quality, construction noise and water quality were
effective. Minor deficiencies found
in the weekly site inspection were rectified within the specified
deadlines. The environmental
performance of the Project was considered satisfactory.
13.1.10For cultural
heritage, the buffer zone between the working area and the Grave was observed and
no construction material or equipment was stored nearby.
13.1.11No
notifications of summons, or successful prosecution were received by the
Contractor during the Reporting Period.
13.2.1 During dry
season, air quality mitigation measures such as watering of site area for 12
times per day and covering of exposed slopes should be fully implemented to
reduce construction dust impact as recommended in the EMIS.
13.2.2 Moreover,
muddy water or other water pollutants from site surface runoff into the public
areas will be key environment issue.
Special attention should be paid on the water quality mitigation
measures to prevent surface runoff flow to public area.
13.2.3 Good
practice for daily housekeeping is reminded. Clean-up of waste skips and
wastewater treatment system should be increased to ensure these facilities are
functioned effectively.
13.2.4 Stagnant
water should be removed as soon as possible after rain to prevent mosquito
breeding on site.
