TABLE OF
CONTENTS
Page |
|||
1 |
1-2 |
||
1.1 |
Basic
Project Information |
1 |
|
1.2 |
Project
Organization |
2 |
|
1.3 |
Construction Programme |
2 |
|
1.4 |
Construction Works
Undertaken During the Reporting Period |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3-6 |
||
2.1 |
Summary of EM&A Requirements |
3-4 |
|
2.2 |
Monitoring Requirements |
4 |
|
2.3 |
Action and Limit Levels |
4-6 |
|
2.4 |
Event
Action plans |
6 |
|
2.5 |
Mitigation Measures |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
7-12 |
||
3.1 |
Air
Quality Monitoring Result |
7 |
|
3.2 |
Noise Monitoring Results |
7 |
|
3.3 |
Water
Quality Monitoring
Results |
7-8 |
|
3.4 |
Dolphin Monitoring |
8-9 |
|
3.5 |
Implementation Status of Environmental
Mitigation Measures |
9 |
|
3.6 |
Advice on the Solid and Liquid
Waste Management Status |
9-11 |
|
3.7 |
Environmental
Licenses and Permits |
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
Summary of Exceedance,
Complaint, notification of summons and sucessful prosecution |
12-13 |
|
4.1 |
Summary of Exceedance of the Environmental
Quality Performance Limit |
12 |
|
4.2 |
Summary
of Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution |
12-13 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
14-15 |
||
5.1 |
Comments |
14 |
|
5.2 |
Recommendations |
14 |
|
5.3
|
Conclusions |
14-15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Figure
1 |
Air
Quality and Noise Monitoring
Stations for HKBCF |
|
|
Figure
2 |
Water Quality Monitoring Stations(construction phases) |
|
|
Figure
3 |
Dolphin Monitoring Transect Line and Layout Map |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table |
|
Table 1.1 |
Contact
Information of Key Personnel |
Table 2.1 |
Air
Quality and Noise Monitoring Locations |
Table 2.2 |
Water
Quality Monitoring Stations (construction phases) |
Table 2.3 |
Action
and Limit Levels for 1-hour TSP |
Table 2.4 |
Action
and Limit Levels for 24-hour TSP |
Table 2.5 |
Action
and Limit Levels for Construction Noise |
Table 2.6 |
Action
and Limit Levels for Water Quality |
Table 2.7 |
Action
and Limit Levels for Chinese White Dolphin Monitoring ¡V Approach to Define
Action |
|
Level ( |
Table 2.8 |
Derived
Value of Action Level ( |
Table 3.1 |
Summary
of marine sediment disposed to dumping site via Contract No. HY/2013/03 |
APPENDIX |
|
Location
of Works Areas |
|
Project
Organization for Environmental Works |
|
Construction
Programme |
|
Event
and Action Plan |
|
Implementation
Schedule for Environmental Mitigation Measures (EMIS) |
|
Site Audit Findings and Corrective Actions |
|
Waste Flow
Table |
|
Environmental
Licenses and Permits |
|
Statistics on
Environmental Complaints, Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecutions |
|
Investigation
Reports on Action Level or Limit Level Non-compliance |
|
Complaint Investigation
Report |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Quarterly Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report is prepared for Contract HY/2013/02
Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge Hong Kong Boundary Crossing Facilities (HKBCF) ¡V
Infrastructure Works Stage I (Western Portion) (hereafter referred to as ¡§the
Contract¡¨) for the Highways Department of Hong Kong Special Administrative
Region (HKSAR). The Contract was awarded to China Harbour Engineering Co., Ltd.
(hereafter referred to as ¡§the Contractor¡¨) and ETS-Testconsult Limited was
appointed as the Environmental Team (ET) by the Contractor.
The Contract is part of
ETS-Testconsult Limited has been appointed by the
Contractor to implement the Environmental Monitoring & Audit (EM&A)
programme for the Contract in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual for
HKBCF (Version 1.0) and provide environmental team services to the Contract.
This is the Eighth Quarterly Environmental
Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Report for the Contract which summaries
findings of the EM&A works conducted during the reporting
period from 01 September 2016 to 30 November
2016.
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
The EM&A programme was
undertaken in accordance with the Updated EM&A Manual for HKBCF (Version
1.0). It should be noted that the air quality and noise monitoring works for
the Contract are covered by Contract No. HY/2010/02 ¡§Hong Kong-Zhuhai-
The dates of environmental site
inspections during the reporting period are listed below:
Environmental Site Inspection
Date |
||
September 2016 |
October 2016 |
November 2016 |
01, 08, 15, 22 and 29 |
06, 13, 20 and 27 |
03, 10, 17 and 24 |
Breaches of Action and
Limit Levels
Summary
of Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at
AMS6 shall be referred to the monthly EM&A report prepared by Contract No.
HY/2011/03.
There was no
Action and Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr
TSP level and 24-hr TSP level recorded at station AMS7 by the
Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2010/02 during the reporting period.
There was no
Action and Limit Level exceedance for
noise recorded at station NMS2 and station NMS3B by the
Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2010/02 during the reporting period.
For water quality monitoring, there
were eighteen exceedances recorded during the reporting period. In September
2016, two Action Level exceedances of SS on impact water quality monitoring at station SR5 and SR7 during mid-flood tide were recorded on 19 September 2016. In October
2016, three Action Level exceedances of SS at station IS(Mf)11, SR6 and SR7 on 03 October 2016, one Action Level exceedance of SS at station
SR6 on 17 October 2016 and one Action Level exceedance of SS at station SR6 during mid-flood tide on 19 October 2016 were recorded during
mid-flood tide. In November 2016, one
Action Level
exceedance of SS at station SR4(N) on 14 November 2016, two Action Level
exceedances of SS at
station IS10 and SR5 and one Limit Level exceedance of SS at
station at SR6 on 16 November 2016, five Action Level exceedances of SS at
station IS(Mf)11, IS10, SR5, SR6 and SR7 on 18 November 2016 and two Action Level exceedances of SS at station SR
Impact dolphin monitoring results at all transects are reported in the
EM&A Report prepared for Contract No. HY/2010/02.
Implementation of Environmental
Measures
Site
inspections were carried out on a weekly basis to monitor the implementation of
proper environmental pollution control and mitigation measures for the Project.
Potential environmental impacts due to the construction activities were
monitored and reviewed.
Complaint Log
There
was a complaint received by EPD from public on 09 November 2016 and forwarded
by EPD to the ENPO on 09 November 2016.Then the ENPO forwarded the complaint by
email to the R.E. (AECOM), the Contractor (China Harbour) and the ET
(ETS-Testconsult Ltd.) of Contract No. HY/2013/02 at 14:52 on 10 November 2016.
The complainant complained that an engineering works vessel named ¡§ªø²±
The
above mentioned complaint follow-up inspection was performed by the ET of
Contract No. HY/2013/02 on 10 November 2016.The
complaint investigation report (Log No. 005) was issued by the ET of Contract
No. HY/2013/02 and verified by the IEC/ENPO on 15 November 2016.
According to the investigation, there was no any
marine works carried out on 07 November 2016 by Contract No. HY/2013/02. The complaint was found non-related to
Contract No. HY/2013/02. The complaint investigation report (Log No. 005) was provided in Appendix K.
Notifications of Summons and
Successful Prosecutions
There
were no notification of summon or prosecution received during the reporting period.
Reporting
Change
There was no reporting change during
the reporting period.
1.1 Basic Project
Information
1.2 Project Organization
Table 1.1 Contact Information
of Key Personnel
Party |
Position |
Name of Key Staff |
Tel. No. |
Fax No. |
Engineer or Engineer¡¦s
Representative (AECOM Asia
Co. Ltd.) |
Resident
Engineer |
Mr. Fred Yeung |
6330
8293 |
3152
5116 |
Mr. Dominic Mow |
6274
0909 |
3152
5116 |
||
Environmental Project Office
/ Independent Environmental Checker (Ramboll Environ Hong Kong Limited) |
Environmental
Project Office Leader |
Mr. Y. H. Hui |
3465
2888 |
3465
2899 |
Independent
Environmental Checker |
Mr.
Raymond Dai |
3465
2888 |
3465
2899 |
|
Environmental
Site Supervisor |
Mr.
Ray Yan |
5181
8165 |
3465
2899 |
|
Contractor
(China Harbour Engineering Co., Ltd.) |
Environmental
Officer |
Mr.
Richard Ng |
5977
0593 |
3915
0300 |
Assistant
Environmental Officer |
Mr.
Paper Chan |
6486
8967 |
3915
0300 |
|
Environmental
Supervisor |
Mr.
Endy Tse |
5512
2662 |
3915
0300 |
|
Environmental Team (ETS-Testconsult
Ltd.) |
Environmental Team Leader |
Mr. C. L. Lau |
2946 7791 |
2695 3944 |
1.3 Construction
Programme
1.4 Construction
Works Undertaken During the Reporting Period
l
Bored piles works in Portion C
& F;
l
Pier / Abutment in Portion A, C & F;
l
Pile Cap in Portion C
& F ;
l
Pre-bored H-pile for sign
gantries in Portion D;
l
Storm drain and water main construction ;
l
Footing construction of
directional signs and duct laying in Portion I & CLP area;
l
Marine
delivery of precast segment & Construction of bridge deck in Portion D, A & E;
&
l
Marine sediment excavation activities from the land-based works and corresponding disposal at the designated disposal sites.
2.1 Summary of EM&A Requirements
The ET of the Contract or another ET of the HZMB project is required to
conduct dolphin monitoring at 23 transects as part of EM&A programme if
these transects are no longer covered under Contract No. HY/2010/02. The dolphin monitoring should adopt line-transect
vessel survey method. The survey follows pre-set and fixed transect lines in the
two areas defined by AFCD as: Northeast Lantau survey area; and
Table 2.1 Air Quality and
Noise Monitoring Locations
Environmental Monitoring |
Identification No. |
Location Description |
|
Air
Quality |
AMS6(1) |
Dragonair / CNAC
(Group) Building |
|
AMS7(1) (2) |
Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel |
||
Noise |
NMS2(3) |
|
|
NMS3B(3)(4) |
Site Boundary of Site Office Area at
Works Area WA2 |
||
Remarks: |
|
||
(1) The ET of this Contract should
conduct impact air quality monitoring at the AMS listed in the table as part
of EM&A programme according to latest notification from ENPO when the
monitoring station(s) is/are no longer covered by another ET of the HZMB
project. |
|
||
(2) The
air quality monitoring location AMS |
|
||
(3) ET of this Contract should
conduct impact noise monitoring at the NMS listed in the table as part of
EM&A programme according to latest notification from ENPO when the
monitoring station(s) is/are no longer covered by another ET of the HZMB
project. |
|
||
(4) The Action and Limit Levels
for schools will be applied for this alternative monitoring location. |
|
||
Table 2.2 Water Quality
Monitoring Stations (construction phases)
Station |
Description |
East |
North |
|
IS7 |
Impact Station (Close
to HKBCF construction site) |
812244 |
818777 |
|
IS10 |
Impact Station (Close
to HKBCF construction site) |
812577 |
820670 |
|
IS(Mf)11 |
Impact Station (Close
to HKBCF construction site) |
813562 |
820716 |
|
SR3 |
Sensitive receivers
(San Tau SSSI) |
810525 |
816456 |
|
SR4(N) |
Sensitive receivers
(Tai Ho) |
814705 |
817859 |
|
SR5 |
Sensitive receivers
(Artificial Reef in NE Airport) |
811489 |
820455 |
|
SR6 |
Sensitive receivers
(Sha Chau and |
805837 |
821818 |
|
SR7 |
Sensitive receivers
(Tai Mo Do) |
814293 |
821431 |
|
SR |
Sensitive receivers (Ma
Wan FCZ)1 |
823741 |
823495 |
|
SR10B(N)[1] |
Sensitive receivers (Ma
Wan FCZ)2 |
823683 |
823187 |
|
CS(Mf)3 |
Control Station |
809989 |
821117 |
|
CS(Mf)5 |
Control Station |
817990 |
821129 |
|
CS4 |
Control Station |
810025 |
824004 |
|
CS6 |
Control Station |
817028 |
823992 |
|
CSA[2] |
Control Station |
818103 |
823064 |
|
Note: |
|
|||
[1]: Additional monitoring station for Ma Wan
FCZ. |
|
|||
[2]: Additional control monitoring station for Ma
Wan FCZ |
|
|||
Remarks: |
|
|||
The ET of this
Contract should conduct impact water quality monitoring at the WQMS listed in
the table as part of EM&A programme according to latest notification from
ENPO when the monitoring station(s) is/are no longer covered by another ET of
the HZMB project. The ET of the
Contract shall communicate and share the monitoring data to the ET(s) of
other works contracts if the water quality monitoring station(s) is/are as
part of EM&A programme. |
|
|||
2.2
Monitoring Requirements
2.3 Action and Limit Levels
Table 2.3 Action and Limit
Levels for 1-hour TSP
Monitoring
Station |
Action Level,mg/m3 |
Limit Level,mg/m3 |
AMS6 ¡V Dragnair / SNAC (Group) Building
(HKIA) |
360 |
500 |
AMS7 ¡V Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel |
370 |
500 |
Table 2.4 Action and Limit
Levels for 24-hour TSP
Monitoring
Station |
Action
Level, mg/m3 |
Limit
Level,mg/m3 |
AMS6 ¡V
Dragnair / SNAC (Group) Building (HKIA) |
173 |
260 |
AMS7 ¡V Hong Kong SkyCity Marriott Hotel |
183 |
260 |
Table 2.5 Action and Limit
Levels for Construction Noise
Parameter |
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
07:00 ¡V
19:00 hours on normal weekdays |
When one
documented complaint is received |
75 dB(A)* |
|
Notes: |
|
||
If works are to be carried out during restricted hours, the conditions stipulated in the construction noise permit issued by the Noise Control Authority have to be followed. * Reduce to 70 dB(A)
for schools and 65 dB(A) during school examination period. |
|
||
2.3.5
The Action and Limit Levels for Water Quality are provided in Table 2.6
Table 2.6 Action and Limit
Levels for Water Quality
Parameters |
Action |
Limit |
|
DO in mg/L (Surface, Middle & Bottom) |
Surface and Middle 5.0 Bottom 4.7 |
Surface and Middle 4.2 (except 5 mg/L for FCZ) Bottom 3.6 |
|
SS in mg/L (depth-averaged) at all monitoring stations and control
stations |
23.5 and 120% of upstream control station's SS at the same tide of the
same day* |
34.4 and 130% of upstream control station's SS at the same tide of the
same day and 10mg/L for WSD Seawater intakes* |
|
Turbidity in NTU (depth-averaged) |
27.5 and 120% of upstream control station's turbidity at the same tide
of the same day* |
47.0 and 130% of upstream control station's turbidity at the same tide
of the same day* |
|
*Remarks: |
Reference is made to EPD approval of adjustment
of water quality assessment criteria |
||
|
issued and
became effective on 18 February 2013. |
||
Notes: |
1.
"depth-averaged"
is calculated by taking the arithmetic means of reading of all three depths. |
||
|
2.
For DO,
non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when monitoring result is lower
than the limits. |
||
|
3.
For
turbidity, SS, non-compliance of the water quality limits occurs when
monitoring result is higher than the limits. |
||
|
4.
All the
figures given in the table are used for reference only and the EPD may amend
the figures whenever it is considered as necessary. |
||
|
5.
The
1%-ile of baseline data for dissolved oxygen (surface and middle) and dissolved
oxygen (bottom) are 4.2mg/L and 3.6mg/L respectively. |
||
2.3.6
If
exceedance(s) at these station(s) is/are recorded by the ET of the Contract or
referred by the other ET under the HZMB project to the Contract, the ET of the
Contract will carry out an investigation and findings will be reported in the
quarterly EM&A Report.
2.3.7
The Action and Limit Levels for Chinese White Dolphin Monitoring are provided in Table 2.7 & Table 2.8
Table 2.7 Action and Limit
Levels for Chinese White Dolphin Monitoring ¡V Approach to Define Action Level (
|
|
|
NEL |
NWL |
|
Action Level |
(STG < 70% of baseline) & (ANI < 70% of baseline) |
(STG < 70% of baseline) & (ANI < 70% of baseline) |
Limit Level |
[(STG < 40% of baseline) & (ANI < 40% of baseline)] AND [ (STG < 40% of baseline) & (ANI < 40% of baseline)] |
For North Lantau Social Cluster, action level will be trigger if either
NEL or NWL fall below the criteria; limit level will be triggered if both NEL
and NWL fall below the criteria.
Table 2.8 Derived Value of
Action Level (
|
|
|
NEL |
NWL |
|
Action Level |
(STG < 4.2) & (ANI < 15.5 ) |
(STG < 6.9) & (ANI < 31.3) |
Limit Level |
[(STG < 2.4) & (ANI < 8.9)] AND [(STG
< 3.9) & (ANI < 17.9)] |
The ET
of this Contract should conduct impact dolphin monitoring as part of EM&A
programme according to latest notification from ENPO when the monitoring transect(s) is/are no longer covered by
another ET of the HZMB project.
2.4 Event
Action Plans
2.5 Mitigation Measures
3 Environmental Monitoring and Audit
3.1 Air
Quality Monitoring Results
3.2 Noise Monitoring Results
3.3 Water
Quality Monitoring Result
There were two Action Level exceedances of SS on impact water quality monitoring at station SR5 and SR7 during mid-flood tide recorded on 19 September 2016. After investigation, there was concluded that the exceedances
were not relevant to this Contract since there was no marine works carried out
by this Contract during September
2016.
There were three Action Level
exceedances of SS at station IS(Mf)11, SR6 and SR7 during mid-flood tide recorded on 03 October 2016, one Action Level exceedances of SS at station SR6 during mid-flood tide recorded on 17 October 2016 and one Action Level
exceedances of SS at station SR6 during mid-flood tide recorded on 19 October 2016. After
investigation, there were concluded
that the exceedances were not relevant to this Contract since there was no
marine works carried out by this Contract during October 2016. The Investigation Reports No. 004, 005 and 006 (including
the causes of exceedance, action taken and recommendation for mitigation) for
Action or Limit Level Non-compliance were provided in Appendix J.
There was one Action Level
exceedance of SS at station SR4(N) during mid-flood tide recorded on 14 November 2016, two Action Level exceedances of SS at station IS10 and SR5 and one Limit Level
exceedance of SS at station at SR6 during mid-flood tide recorded on 16 November 2016, five Action Level
exceedances of SS at station IS(Mf)11, IS10, SR5,
SR6 and SR7 during mid-flood tide recorded on 18 November 2016 and two Action Level
exceedances of SS at station SR
3.3.5
There
was no exceedance recorded on other monitoring date at the
monitoring stations showed in Table 2.2
by the Environmental Team of Contract No. HY/2010/02 during the reporting period.
3.3.6
Although the exceedance was not relevant to
this Contract, the Contractor was reminded to ensure all construction
activities that generate wastewater with high concentrations of suspended solid
(SS) should be collected to sedimentation tanks or package treatment systems
for proper treatment prior to disposal. The Contractor was also reminded to
ensure that all silt removal facilities, channels and manholes shall be
maintained and any deposited silt and grit shall be removed regularly.
3.4
Dolphin monitoring
Result
3.4.1
Impact dolphin monitoring
results at all transects were reported in the EM&A Report prepared for
Contract No. HY/2010/02. One limit level exceedance was recorded in the
monitoring period (September 2016 ¡V November 2016).
3.4.2
During this reporting
period, no marine works was conducted by Contract No. HY/2013/02. After checked
the Contractor¡¦s
3.4.3
The exceedance is still under investigation by Contract No.
HY/2010/02. The Investigation Report (including the causes of exceedance,
action taken and recommendation for mitigation) for Action or Limit Level
Non-compliance will be prepared by the ET of Contract No. HY/2010/02 and
detailed in the quarterly EM&A Report prepared for
Contract No. HY/2010/02. The implementation of Regular Marine Travel Route Plan (RMTRP) for the
above mentioned dry cargo barges of marine
transportation undertaken by Contract No. HY/2013/02 during the reporting
period were checked by the ET. The Regular Marine Travel Route Plan were prepared and given to the
Caption to use in order
to minimize the chance of vessel collision and the routes would not go through
the dolphin hotspot in
3.5
Implementation of Environmental Measures
3.6 Advice on
the Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status
3.6.2
Table 3.1 Summary of
marine sediment disposed to dumping site via Contract No. HY/2013/03
Month/Year |
Quantity
disposed (m3) |
January 2016 |
1272 |
February 2016 |
2816 |
March 2016 |
600 |
April 2016 |
5218 |
May 2016 |
0 |
June 2016 |
1200 |
July 2016 |
728 |
August 2016 |
1784 |
September 2016 |
2328 |
October 2016 |
1096 |
November 2016 |
0 |
Total = |
16952 |
3.7 Environmental
Licenses and Permits
4 Summary
of exceedance, complaint, notification of summons and successful prosecution
4.1 Summary
of Exceedance of the Environmental Quality Performance Limit
4.1.4
For water
quality monitoring, there were eighteen exceedances recorded during the
reporting period. In September 2016, two Action Level exceedances of SS on
impact water quality monitoring at station SR5 and SR7 during mid-flood tide were recorded on 19 September 2016. In October 2016, three Action Level exceedances of SS at
station IS(Mf)11, SR6 and SR7 on 03 October 2016, one Action Level exceedance of SS at station SR6 on 17 October 2016 and one Action Level exceedance of SS at station SR6 during mid-flood tide on 19 October 2016 were recorded during mid-flood tide. In November 2016, one Action Level exceedance of SS at station SR4(N) on 14 November 2016, two Action Level exceedances of SS at
station IS10 and SR5 and one Limit Level
exceedance of SS at station at
SR6 on 16 November 2016, five Action Level
exceedances of SS at station IS(Mf)11, IS10,
SR5, SR6 and SR7 on 18 November 2016 and two Action Level
exceedances of SS at station SR
4.1.5
Impact
dolphin monitoring results at all transects are reported in the EM&A Report
prepared for Contract No. HY/2010/02.
4.2
Summary of Complaints,
Notification of Summons and Successful Prosecution
4.2.1
There was a complaint received by
EPD from public on 09 November 2016 and forwarded by EPD to the ENPO on 09
November 2016.Then the ENPO forwarded the complaint by email to the R.E.
(AECOM), the Contractor (China Harbour) and the ET (ETS-Testconsult Ltd.) of
Contract No. HY/2013/02 at 14:52 on 10 November 2016. The complainant
complained that an engineering works vessel named ¡§ªø²±
The
above mentioned complaint follow-up inspection was performed by the ET of Contract
No. HY/2013/02 on 10 November 2016.The
complaint investigation report (Log No. 005) was issued by the ET of Contract
No. HY/2013/02 and verified by the IEC/ENPO on 15 November 2016.
4.2.2
According to the investigation,
there was no any marine works carried out on 07 November 2016 by Contract
No. HY/2013/02. The
complaint was found non-related to Contract No. HY/2013/02. The complaint
investigation report (Log No. 005) was
provided in Appendix
K.
4.2.3
Although this complaint was
non-related to Contract No. HY/2013/02, the Contractor of Contract No.
HY/2013/02 was reminded to provide appropriate water pollution mitigation
measures for the marine working vessels during any marine works, such as remind
all Captains of the vessels to avoid arranging vessels to travel in the area
during low tide or discharge waste water to the sea etc.
4.2.4
There were no notifications of
summons or prosecutions received during the reporting period.
4.2.5
Statistics
on environmental complaints,
notifications of summons and successful prosecutions are summarized in Appendix I.
5 Comments,
recommendations and conclusion
5.1 Comments
n
The Contractor was reminded to dispose the general refuse
properly;
n
The Contractor was reminded to store the C&D waste/material
properly;
n
The Contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for the
chemical containers;
n
The Contractor was reminded to clear stagnant water pool;
n
The Contractor was reminded to provide appropriate
NRMM label for the machines;
n
The Contractor was reminded to enhance the water spraying;
n
The Contractor was reminded to provide impervious sheet to
cover the stock of cement.
n
The Contractor was reminded
to prevent oil spill from the generators.
n
The Contractor was reminded
to provide appropriate label for temporary storage area.
5.2 Recommendations
5.3
Conclusions
5.3.2
Summary of Action and
Limit Level exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP level at AMS6 shall be
referred to the monthly EM&A report prepared by Contract No. HY/2011/03.
5.3.3
There was no
Action and Limit Level
exceedance of 1-hr TSP level and 24-hr TSP
level recorded at station AMS7 by the Environmental Team of Contract
No. HY/2010/02 during the reporting period.
5.3.4
There was no
Action and Limit Level
exceedance of noise recorded at
station NMS2 and station NMS3B by the Environmental Team of Contract No.
HY/2010/02 during the reporting period.
5.3.5
There were
eighteen exceedances recorded during the reporting period. In September 2016,
two Action Level exceedances of SS on impact water quality monitoring at station SR5 and SR7 during mid-flood tide were recorded
on 19 September 2016. In October 2016, three
Action Level exceedances of SS at station IS(Mf)11, SR6 and SR7 on 03 October 2016, one Action Level
exceedance of SS at station SR6 on 17 October 2016 and one Action Level exceedance of SS at station SR6 during mid-flood tide on 19 October 2016 were recorded during mid-flood tide. In November 2016, one Action Level exceedance of SS at station SR4(N) on 14 November 2016, two Action Level exceedances of SS at
station IS10 and SR5 and one Limit Level
exceedance of SS at station at
SR6 on 16 November 2016, five Action Level
exceedances of SS at station IS(Mf)11, IS10,
SR5, SR6 and SR7 on 18 November 2016 and two Action Level
exceedances of SS at station SR
5.3.6
Impact
dolphin monitoring results at all transects are reported in the EM&A Report
prepared for Contract No. HY/2010/02.
5.3.7
Environmental
site inspections were carried out on 01, 08, 15, 22 and 29 September 2016, 06, 13, 20 and 27 October
2016 and 03, 10, 17 and 24 November 2016.
Recommendations on remedial actions were given to the Contractors for the
deficiencies identified during the site inspections.
5.3.8
There was one complaint received in relation to the environmental
impact during the reporting period. The complaint was found non-related
to Contract No. HY/2013/02. The complaint investigation reports (Log No. 005) was provided in Appendix K.
5.3.9
There was no notification of summons and successful prosecution was
received during the reporting period.